Weblog

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

  • just rambling my mind's itches

    i have so much going on in my brain both positive and negative that i wanted to express them in writing. i am sorry if this sounds like complaining or ungratefulness. some of you may already know my story but not everyone does. and i can't seem to let go of it.

     

    i have an older house like i have always wanted.

    nature is much more noticable and appreciated here than where i used to live.

    my dh works  close enough to come home for lunch every day.

    he works close enough to ride a bike so we don't spend on gas!

    my sons can go with him if they want.

    the homeschooling laws in texas are fantastic.

    i need hsing books but can't afford them!  the library is no help like it was in florida. i am too depressed to come up with good unschooling ideas.

    i have been able to get food stamps easily and i need them desperately. i hate that i need them.

    we have a walmart and everyone knows if you have a walmart you can survive.

    the only store we have is walmart! if you drive 30 minutes you get some other stores but it is NOTHING like where i used to live. i miss  my hometown.

    our library is so small! and so out of date.  i am used to having everyone check out 50 books per person, here we are allowed 6. and that includes movies. but that's ok- the latest book was printed  in 1982!!!!!  no lie!!! we just don't get new books!!  i have requested 30 interlibrary loans since we got here andhave not received one!!!!! i ask and ask why and the answer is always "i don't know"   i love my librarian but not my library.  no walmart doesn't carry much in the way of books- i even  asked why at christmas and was told  there isn't much call for them!!!  how can that be?

    we don't have tv so i don't even have that!  we live too far out to get tv reception and we can't afford cable. i hate the ungodly tv but i would like some stimulation!!!

    there are no kids my 22 yr old dd's age- they are all married with kids and she's not. she is immensly lonely.

    i can't get driver's liscences for my dd and my ds.  we need to live here 3 yrs before my son can get one ( i know- WHAT?!)  and my dd needs 3 types of id and we have only 2 and they won't give her one til she gets married, goes to prison or becomes a pilot.  please don't say that's not true- i have been round and round with the authorities and know this to be true.

    i am trying to stay on keel but i am not. pregnancy hormones don't help. i am miserably unhappy - we are all- and i can't seem to get it together.  there are days i don't get dressed-! i am slipping and have no one to help me.  please don't suggest church- i have been down that route and am so sick of the politics!! i am less of a christian when i attend church. tho am not much of one now- i feel like God dumped us here- not that He led us here.

    i tell myself to give myself a break but it ain't easy. i tell myself that i have suffered a lot of trauma in a very short time and to give myself a break. i have had my home hit by a tornado nearly destroying the whole thing, lost my home of fifteen years to foreclosure, my car to repo, my rental home to eviction, my dad is suffering from cancer and needs a heart operation also, i have lost my neighbors and friends i saw daily, and now i literally see no one but my family, i have lost the ability to read as i explained above and reading is my lifeblood. i have suffered a miscarriage and then got pregnant again, 

    all of this in 6 months.

     i am sorry if this sounds like complaining but it is my blog and i needed to articulate my feelings.

     how do you be your own titus 2 woman when you are so depressed and lonely and bored and sad and grief stricken that you can barely get out of bed in the morning?   serious answers only please, no "you need to pray" or "be glad you don't have cancer" or "smile, it could be worse", i know all that and it doesn't help

     

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

  • Currently Watching
    Pay It Forward
    By Kevin Spacey, Helen Hunt, Haley Joel Osment, Jay Mohr, James Caviezel
    see related

    island life has a great contest going on! win a beautiful hair bow and holder!

    oh my gosh what a great blog entry here! for all those who believe a woman's place is in the home. chica has a fantastic read!


    now for the rest of today's blog! a few highlights i have picked up from books.


    a few drops of warm garlic oil or olive oil will help relieve the pain of an earache. - from prescription for nutritional healing

    the fda does not test cosmetics for safety as it does food or drugs. did you know that commercial brands of makeup have a wide range of undisclosed chemicals that can cause cancer, nerve and reproductive damage, and birth defects, as well as irriation and allergies. from living healthy in a toxic world.

    if you give birth in a hospital they will put silver nitrate in your baby's eyes.this is in case the mother has gonorrhea. keep in mind that they test you previously for this so it is not necessary! silver nitrate causes chemical conjunctivitis in 30 to 50 percent of the babies who receive it. it also makes it hard for the baby to see well for the first week or so of life. why do doctors give silver nitrate if they already have mom's test result?! - from how to raise a healthy child in spite of your doctor.

    if a child stays home with mom for the first 12 to 18 months of life, when hib disease occurs most often then the likelihood of exposure decreases dramatically compared to a child who attends a daycare. since this vaccine has some serious reactions associated with it you may want to consider this. - from the vaccine guide

    while a husband is at work he needs the assurance that the home fires continue to burn (without burning down the house lol). if he is denied this assurance he is unable to properly apply his mind and energy to his job. this means that i, as his helpmate, have a lot to do in order to assure him that all is well on the homefront and to provide the type of restful atmosphere that he needs when he is home. - from on the other side of the garden.

    to get more juice out of a lemon, microwave it on high for 30 seconds. the vitamins will not be destroyed and you will get twice as much juice. - from emilie's creative home organizer

    feminists who claim that the role of a homemaker is demeaning to women never understood proverbs 31. a homemaker has to combine elements of an ecomonist, adminstrator, and business manager to analyze available products, exercise wisdom and foresight to make intelligent purchases and assign tasks to her household labor force (this household labor force may consist of appliances and children, not simply someone you hire.) at the same time she must fulfill her responsibilities as a wife and mother. - from different by design

    statistics from 1991, from the national crime survey, released from the department of justice shows that there were almost 3 million violent crimes and thefts in public schools every year. this equals 16 thousand incindents per day or one every 6 seconds. this was 17 years ago and it is worse now. - from the right choice homeschooling

    something to consider, concerning jobs, is that those with higher college degrees may experience difficulty finding jobs. the higher you climb the education ladder the fewer jobs you'll find requiring those skills and if you can't find a job after all that schooling how will you repay the student loans you are bound to need? that is why it is imperative to seek God's direction for your son. God may have in mind a more menial job but it will be one with a future. - from preparing sons to provide for a single income family

    a wife should realize that being submissive is a fruit of her salvation. john 15:8 states by this is My Father glorified that you bear much fruit and so prove to be My disciples. - from the excellent wife

    remember to show your homeschooled student any errors they make in their schoolwork. an error checked as wrong but not corrected does not promote learning. from homestyle teaching

    God gives us the opportunity to build in our husbands what we wives need by our obedience. so if we obey our husbands we will be rewarded. from a wife's purpose

    give God a chance to provide it before you buy it. this is a way of making ends meet. for example i once needed a bread machine but didn't have the money for it. i wrote it down in my prayer journal, i had planned to look at garage sales for one. imagine my surprise at, not once hearing about this request, my parents gave me one for my birthday a week later! - from God's plan for home improvement

    if your husband insists you go to work, obey him. meanwhile, pray that God changes his mind or gives you an alternative. God knows what you and/or your husband need to mature, so His answer to your prayer will fulfill your current needs. - from you can be the wife of a happy husband

    did you know that it is not always necessary that a single mom work fulltime outside her home? she may start a homebased business and be with her children either fulltime or parttime running a home daycare, cleaning houses, and being medical transcriptionist are just a few ideas. look into selling handcrafted items or working for a homebased company like mary kay. there are others. - from home by choice

    when does a child need a spanking? when you have given a directive that he has heard and can understand and he has not obeyed without challenge without excuse or without delay. from shepherding a child's heart

    concerning children and church, at a typical american church service you will encounter that church is for adults. this is not what God says in His Word! one tip on helping your children during service is to keep them up and "running" until the service actually starts. it is difficult to parent in the pew but it is worth it. by the way leave the bribes at home. this means don't keep them supplied with a constant stream of coloring books, candy and other gifts! this detracts from what church is all about - worshiping God. - from all the way home

    if you wouldn't send your child into the home of someone who didn't share your values why would you send them to a daycare or school, where there are many values presented that you don't agree with?! from the way home

    just a few things i had highlighted in some books i have. ~smile~

     

    reading together

Monday, May 05, 2008

  • Currently Reading
    Simple Secrets to a Beautiful Home: Creating a Place You and Your Family Will Love
    By Emilie Barnes
    see related

    read this at jonash's homesteading blog



    I blogged earlier about the sermon I recommended listening to, it draws a very scary parallel between children and old people . . . .
    LISTEN! Please listen! This is what we believe about children now!!! This is what all of our young people, our teenagers believe! Christian or not!

    #1 If you can't conviently afford children - DON'T HAVE THEM!

    #2 If children disrupt your lifestyle - DON'T HAVE THEM!

    Oh, my God! Please forgive us our sins! We as Christians have bought into a horrible lie . . . these same children are going to grow up, they are going to say "These old people - they disrupt our lifestyle. They are expensive. They complain." and they are going to start euthenizing . . . .

    We don't see the value in children, we aren't going to see the value in old people. If we can't sacrifice for children how will we ever sacrifice our own comfort for our aging parents with grace?
    Oh, I am broken about this . . . .

    I've also been reading a book which is called Passionate Housewives Desperate for God. I'm sure many of you have heard of it. While I don't agree with some of the theology in the book, the theme that housewives are doing an important task that is given them by God, and that they should turn to Him (instead of pampering themselves) when they struggle makes it a very wonderful read for me.

    Anyway, in one part of the book there is a brief discussion of how the Romans often either killed or abandoned their unwanted babies, and how the Christians in the area would often adopt these "unwanted" whenever they found them.
    What do you think went through these Christian's minds whenever they found a helpless, tiny baby laying somewhere in the elements? Do you think that when they saw an extra baby they just said "What's an extra mouth to feed? Bring 'em along!"? Do you think they didn't have to make a HUGE decision right then and there?

    Why do we read about other people and assume that they are better equiped to follow God than we are? Did every family that took in an orphan have an empty bedroom and spare change jingling in their pockets? They didn't have any trials or any difficulty feeding or clothing themselves . . . of course not!

    I don't think people really change. Life had just as many challenges back then, probably different ones or possibly more fatal ones... Hunger was more well known, and clothing had to be made by hand. If a fox got into the henhouse it meant nobody had eggs or chicken to eat for a while.

    As a mother of several back then, it'd be easy to see another child as a burden. I don't care how much of a help that baby would grow up to be on the "farm" it's still a huge investment until then. A baby has to be fed and clothed and housed and taught, or it isn't going to be any help at all! In case you didn't know, houses weren't huge back then; you'd have to build on yourself. You'd have to either spend money, or creat each piece of fabric by hand.
    I just took a spinning class a few weekends ago, and if we suddenly had to rely on my spinning and crocheting skills we'd all be naked for a long, long time. I have great respect for those that had to take nasty, dirty fleeces and pick them clean, wash them, spin them, and then turn them into fabric. The amount of work that would go into one shirt just staggers me!
    We have so many modern conviences, but that doesn't matter. The media has convienced us that we need more, more, more. You don't just need diapers and a few baby clothes and a couple of baby blankets; we need things that a generation ago were "luxeries" - you need a fully decorated, themed nursery with matching baby furniture, more toys than our parents' generation grew up with all together, and special soaps, lotions, shampoos, you name it!
    What happened to being poor but loving each other, working together? Why, I think most of us would have to be richer than Bill Gates before we even considered helping out other people, at least to the extent of adoption to say the least!
    So do you think that the Christians that added pitiful, abandoned babies to their homes were all wealthy?
    Let's say, in a modern context that we are walking along and find a baby crying in a dumpster. What do you do? What excuses could we make?

    "The mom is bound to come back for it soon, the wee little thing."

    "Oh, how sad! If I didn't have so many of my own to feed . . . ."

    "Well, we just had a baby. Two in diapers is just a herculene task I'd be crazy to volunteer for."

    "Man, things are just tight right now. The price of gas is really hurting us. Why, if it gets much worse we're going to have to cut back and just get basic cable - there is no way we can upgrade our car to hold another."

    "Oh, how dreadful! I'm going to take this baby to the proper authorities imediately! What? Raise it myself? But I don't have an idea what diseases the poor mother might have had or what issues this baby might grow up to posses! It's better that the state take the wee thing. They are there to handle these kind of situations."

    What went through a Christian's mind when they found an abandoned baby? What happened when someone brought them another because they just knew, they knew these people loved children and would give their baby a home?
    I have to stop ranting. I'm emotional today.
    I just wish more people really loved children . . . .
    Ashley

Sunday, May 04, 2008

  • well while  michael and i were literally chasing down the man who stole our stuff - we were not successful  at getting it back - my kids were playing around and parker aged 7 fell thru the dining room window.!!   he cut the area under his nose badly and his arms and hands have lots of cuts .  he will be fine, thank God!    but i don't have a window  now just a big gaping hole.. landlord says it's our responsibility- he's right i know but i have no money!      boy this day sucks.
  • another reason to homebirth!!!

     big brother is alive and well!!
     
     
    President Bush last week signed into law a bill which will see
    the federal government begin to screen the DNA of all newborn babies
    in the U.S. within six months, a move critics have described as the
    first step towards the establishment of a national DNA database.
    Described as a "national contingency plan" the justification for the
    new law S. 1858, known as The Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of
    2007, is that it represents preparation for any sort of "public
    health emergency." The bill states that the federal government
    should "continue to carry out, coordinate, and expand research in
    newborn screening" and "maintain a central clearinghouse of current
    information on newborn screening... ensuring that the clearinghouse
    is available on the Internet and is updated at least quarterly".
    Sections of the bill also make it clear that DNA may be used in
    genetic experiments and tests. Read the full bill here. One
    health care expert and prominent critic of DNA screening
    > is Twila Brase, president of the Citizens' Council on Health Care
    who has written a detailed analysis (PDF) of the new law in which she
    warns that it represents the first program of populationwide genetic
    testing. Brase states that S.1858 and H.R. 3825, the House version
    of the bill, will:
    > Establish a national list of genetic conditions for which
    newborns and children are to be tested.
    > Establish protocols for the linking and sharing of genetic test
    results nationwide.
    > Build surveillance systems for tracking the health status and
    health outcomes of individuals diagnosed at birth with a genetic
    defect or trait.
    > Use the newborn screening program as an opportunity for
    government agencies to identify, list, and study "secondary
    conditions" of individuals and their families.
    > Subject citizens to genetic research without their knowledge or
    consent.
    > "Soon, under this bill, the DNA of all citizens will be housed in
    government genomic biobanks and considered governmental property for
    government research," Brase writes. "The DNA taken at birth from
    every citizen is essentially owned by the government, and every
    citizen becomes a potential subject of government-sponsored genetic
    research." "The public is clueless. S. 1858 imposes a federal
    agenda of DNA databanking and population-wide genetic research. It
    does not require consent and there are no requirements to fully
    inform parents about the warehousing of their child's DNA for the
    purpose of genetic research." In a previous report we outlined the
    consequences of the already existing DNA warehousing operation in
    Minnesota, a program that the Citizens' Council on Health Care has
    been following closely for a number of years. Ms. Brase explained
    in a statement last month that state Health Department officials are
    now seeking exemption for the so called "DNA
    > Warehouse" from Minnesota privacy law. This would enable state
    officials to continue to take the DNA of newborn infants without
    consent, which would also set the precedent for nationwide policy on
    DNA screening. DNA of newborns has already been harvested, tested,
    stored and experimented with nationwide.
    The National Conference of
    State Legislatures lists for all 50 states, as well as the District
    of Columbia, the various statutes or regulatory provisions under
    which newborns' DNA is already being collected. In addition, all 50
    states are now routinely providing these results to the Department of
    Homeland Security. The Newborn Screening Saves Lives Act of 2007
    merely establishes this practice within the law. Another vocal
    critic of bill S. 1858 is Texas Congressman Ron Paul who made the
    following comments before the U.S. House of Representatives: "I
    cannot support legislation, no matter how much I sympathize with the
    legislation's stated goals, that exceed the
    > Constitutional limitations on federal power or in any way
    threatens the liberty of the American people. Since S. 1858 violates
    the Constitution, and may have untended consequences that will weaken
    the American health care system and further erode medical privacy, I
    must oppose it." Paul, a medical doctor himself continued, "S. 1858
    gives the federal bureaucracy the authority to develop a model
    newborn screening program. Madame Speaker the federal government
    lacks both the constitutional authority and the competence to develop
    a newborn screening program adequate for a nation as large and
    diverse as the United States. …"
    > "Those of us in the medical profession should be particularly
    concerned about policies allowing government officials and state-
    favored interests to access our medical records without our consent …
    My review of S. 1858 indicates the drafters of the legislation made
    no effort to ensure these newborn screening programs do not violate
    the privacy rights of parents and children," Paul continued.
    > "In fact, by directing federal bureaucrats to create a
    contingency plan for newborn screening in the event of a 'public
    health' disaster, this bill may lead to further erosions of medical
    privacy.
    As recent history so eloquently illustrates, politicians are
    more than willing to take, and people are more than willing to cede,
    liberty during times of 'emergency," he concluded.