In ChristThe Teleological Quest is found in Him
Bueler
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Name: Joshua
Country: United States
State: Kentucky
Metro: Louisville
Birthday: 3/9/1982
Gender: Male


Interests: My interests include but not limited to the study of culture, philosophy and theology. I also enjoy playing pool, movies and reading.
Expertise: I'm still looking.
Occupation: Student
Industry: Research


Message: message meEmail: email me
MSN: ninmasterjf@hotmail.com


Member Since: 8/17/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
nuttmeg813
eowynshieldmaiden
JMCovenanter
Kara_Alethia
alabasterpeace
tweekle
apostellombu
St_Arbucks
highergrnds
thegreekphysique
Thugater_Theos
pseudo
REV_MC
eclenihan
andrewnagy
elvsie
Heckalita
hollymertz

Blogrings
Missouri Baptist University
previous - random - next

Mere Lewis: For Readers of C.S. Lewis
previous - random - next

Reforming the Mind
previous - random - next

Immanuel Baptist Church, Louisville
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Saturday, January 06, 2007

Currently Reading
God, Reason and Theistic Proofs (Reason and Religion)
By Stephen T. Davis
see related

This book is great.  I highly recommend it.      


Thursday, August 03, 2006

Currently Watching
Munich (Widescreen Edition)
By Eric Bana, Daniel Craig, Ciar?n Hinds, Mathieu Kassovitz, Hanns Zischler, Ayelet Zurer, Geoffrey Rush, Gila Almagor, Michael Lonsdale, Mathieu Amalric, Moritz Bleibtreu, Valeria Bruni Tedeschi, Meret Becker, Marie-Jos?e Croze, Yvan Attal, Ami Weinberg, Lynn Cohen, Amos Lavi, Moshe Ivgy, Michael Warshaviak
see related

I just finished watching Munich. It was pretty good. I recommend it. It was very violent, though.


Thursday, July 27, 2006

Currently Reading
The Metaphor of God Incarnate: Christology in a Pluralistic Age
By John Hick
see related

Yeah, I know its been a while.  I don't have anything fantastic to say right now.  I have been consumed the last couple weeks with a class, working all the time, and moving in with shorty and the Warden.  So, I will update soon.

What do you guys think of John Hick? 


Friday, June 30, 2006

Currently Watching
Pi
see related

I would strongly recommend this movie.  It was great.  Its about a mathmatical genius who at some point during the movie figures out pi, and two groups of people are chasing after him for his knowledge.  This knowledge becomes a blessing and a curse that he doesn't want.  Check it out. 


Thursday, June 29, 2006

Just a few thoughts on 1 Samuel 15 the climactic passage of Saul's term being King over Israel.  In this passage, Saul is rejected as King by God through the prophet Samuel.  The grounds for rejection is Saul's disobediance to God's word.  In effect he traded in "the Glory of Israel" (a title used in reference to God) for his own glory. 

As I think through this passage I am reminded of the central place God's word has in my life.  The situation of Saul starts with a command given to him by God in verse 3 to destroy everything that Amalek had.  The problem:  He disobeyed the Word of the Lord by saving the good stuff.  The motivation:  It may have been to build his own kingdom instead of God's.  See, in his eyes he was doing the right thing or the pragmatic thing by saving what he thought was good.  But according to the text God had another plan.  God's reaction:  To send the prophet Samuel to relay the message that Saul would be dethroned because he had disobeyed the "voice of the Lord," which is synonomous with God's word, "My commands" (15:11), and "words of the Lord" (15:1). 

The story continues with Samuel's message where in effect says:  Saul has rebelled, been insubordinate, and rejected God's word. 

After Saul has been exposed he could do one of two things.  He could either repent or shift the blame.  He chose to shift the blame to the people.  Ironically, to the people he himself was leading (v. 24).  This reveals a lot about the heart of Saul.  First, instead of commiting true repentance (according to what we know it to be in later revelation) he denies responsibility.  Second, it shows that he feared the people implicating that it was more about him, his wealth, fame, power and popularity.  It was not about God.  Third, it shows that he did not have a true knowledge of God from the begining for if he did he would have feared the God who created him and sustains his very existence.  Fourth, it shows that he was more interested in creating his own kingdom not God's.  Fifth, it shows that he wanted to be the glordy of Israel and not promote the "Glory of Israel".  Sixth, it shows his method of defense, which is undergirded by his self-centeredness, that being tradition or the traditional understanding of sacrifices.  For he uses tradition as a means of defending his actions.  This is subtle for much of what he said was true and sounded good.  Sacrifice was an excuse often used by Israel.  This was a partial truth. 

How does this apply to the rest of scripture?  One could apply the positive implication that being to obey the voice of the Lord for the purpose of promoting the "Glory of Israel".  It could be connected to the Psalms and Proverbs, which serve as spiritual guides.  Also one could connect it to the words of our Lord in Matthew 15:1-20. 

I believe the exhortation of the text is to obey the Word of God.  I think it is also important to examine ourselves, our lives, our motivations in light of this text.  If we are being led by our own pragmatic interests then we must repent.  If we fear men more than God then we must repent.  If we have sought to justify ourselves using partial truths then we must repent.  Finally, we must obey the Word of God.   



Next 5 >>