Taking down liberals with real evidence
Conservative_newsletter
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit Conservative_newsletter's Xanga Site!

Gender: Male


Occupation: Student


Message: message meEmail: email me
AIM: consernews


Member Since: 1/20/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read
Hedgehogman
squidami666
PoliBlog
gibber729
TarrantRepublican
Ultra_Conservative
thatliberalmedia
TheRightWingView
yung_conservative
sjc_conservative
XaNgA_MuSiC
raging_kriket
adeezy
ProudAmerican912
TheVastRightWingConspiracy
rightwinggirl33
RIGHTWINGEXTREMIST
StudentVoice05

Blogrings
**Pro-Life**
previous - random - next

College Republicans
previous - random - next

Conservative Truth
previous - random - next

Friends Don't Let Friends Vote Democratic
previous - random - next

Anti-ACLU
previous - random - next

Angry Republican Geniuses!
previous - random - next

-Jackhammer Conservatives-
previous - random - next

Coalition of American Patriots
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Saturday, January 27, 2007

There have been many messages sent to me asking me where I have gone.  Well folks, I recently got a job writing for a paper and this has taken up most of my time.  If you are wanting to check out my articles, they are being posted on www.kstatecollegian.com.  Just look for Brett King on tuesdays. 


Tuesday, October 31, 2006

This week's format is different than a typical issue.  The other writers
and myself are doing what is called clash week.  During clash week, we
take opposing sides to issues that are supposed to be funny.  Another
writer and I went head to head on the issue of which is the better
movie Animal House or Caddyshack.  

The Dao of Caddyshack
Improving life through the values of Caddyshack

        Throughout history, the people of the United States have always taken
distinct sides and created struggle between groups. With eternal
struggles — such as North vs. South and Budweiser vs. Miller, there is
still one issue that remains supreme. That is the timeless debate
between Caddyshack and Animal House.
        On the surface, both movies are difficult to compare, due to their
basic concept — the snobs verses the slobs. Each film has casts of top
notch comedians that ad-libbed many of the movies’ key scenes. Even
with all their similarities, Caddyshack does come out on top of this
epic bout.
        Animal House, in all of its greatness, is only a guide to how one
should act in college. Caddyshack provides a guide for life’s ups and
downs, “which is nice”.
        The characters of Danny Noonan, Ty Webb and Carl Spackler provide
examples of how one should handle situations that develop during one's
lifetime.
        Danny faces many of the same predicaments that people face while
growing up. We are always told that we have to go to college or we will
end up “right in the lumber yard”. Is this really the only path we have
to take for our future?
        Wisdom provided by Ty Webb to Danny demonstrates the endless
possibilities we have in this country. “This isn’t Russia”, we can do
or be anything.  The key is to keep your integrity strong, remain loyal
to your friend, and not be afraid to take a gamble.
        Ty demonstrates to viewers what it means to stay true to yourself. He
does not become locked into the rat race of life or an image that
others expect of him.
        I have always been told that you can tell a lot about a person by the
way they play golf. If a person cheats at golf, most likely they lie
and cheat others. Ty has enough confidence in himself that he doesn't
find it necessary to keep score and compares himself to other golfers
only "by height".
        Carl Spackler is the most underestimated genius of the film. People
think that he is “an idiot or something cause all [he] does is
cut lawns for a living”; however, he fights his campaign against the
gopher by using the ideas of Sun Tzu in the "Art Of War".
        Carl realizes in his battles against the elusive gopher that
traditional means of fighting will not allow him to achieve his
objective. “To kill, you must know your enemy and in this case my enemy
is a varmint.”
        He falls back in retreat to use the gopher’s allies against him – “the
harmless squirrel and the friendly rabbit.”
        Yes, in the end Carl might have destroyed the golf course by using too
much plastic explosive; but, I can bet the gopher will think twice
about going up against Carl Spackler.
        This issue can finally be put to rest after years of debate. My hope is
that Animal House fans will finally realize that Caddyshack will always
remain superior through the messages the film provides.

http://www.kstatecollegian.com/media/storage/paper1022/news/2006/10/30/Opinion/The-Dao.Of.Caddyshack-2410371.shtml?norewrite200610311938&sourcedomain=www.kstatecollegian.com


Thursday, October 26, 2006

How the religious right is defeating themselves

Our government's makeup could change drastically in 12 days. However, the ownership of the House and Senate will change hands to the Democrats, not by their success in elections, but rather by conservative Christians handing it to them.

The Democrats running on the state and national level have not gained voters. Due to recent disagreements between Republicans, the average GOP voter feels left behind in politicians' pursuit of the conservative Christian vote.

Even with all the pandering, Dr. James Dobson, founder of the Focus on the Family Institute, believes conservative Christians should teach the Republican party a lesson by not voting in the upcoming elections.

Dobson was quoted at the recent Values Voters Summit saying, "In 2004, we really did break our necks to turn out the vote. For the two years since then, I have been extremely disappointed with what the Republicans have done with the power they were given."

Since 2004, conservative Christian ideals have been central in the country's domestic policy. No other group in America has seen more victories, like the appointments of Justices John G. Roberts and Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court, than the religious right.

The social issues that motivate folks like Dobson are important but are not the issues that need to be at the forefront of Congressional debate. Their ideals and beliefs should be argued in the marketplace of ideas. It is their job to change the hearts and minds of Americans.

Conservative Christians need to remember that they should not cut off their nose to spite their face. If they were to follow Dobson's request and stay home on Nov. 7, conservative Christians would do a larger disservice to their own cause.

Dick Armey, former House Republican leader, said it best: "Dobson and his gang of thugs are real nasty bullies. I pray devoutly every day, but being a Christian is no excuse for being stupid."

The easiest way to lose is to not show up.

A loss for the GOP would be a serious blow to our country, but it might be just what the Republicans need. Losing the House or Senate would force Republicans to remember how they gained control back in 1994.

Republicans need to formulate a new contract with the nation for today's situation. A contract that stresses lower taxes, fiscal responsibility, privatization of Social Security, protection of our borders, and a decrease in government bureaucracy - the issues that truly affect the American people.

http://media.www.kstatecollegian.com/media/storage/paper1022/news/2006/10/26/Opinion/How-The.Religious.Right.Is.Defeating.Themselves-2404002.shtml?sourcedomain=www.kstatecollegian.com&MIIHost=media.collegepublisher.com


Friday, October 20, 2006

Right now, I am having a little personal party with a lot of wonderful adult beverages.  A little personal celebration for my new media outlet.  Even after my events last semester with the radio show, I am now a writer for the student newspaper a K-state.  I wll publish the articles here as well as give a link the K-state paper website.  Not sure what the first topic will be, if you all want to shoot some suggestions that would be appreciated. 

 


Monday, October 09, 2006

Donald Rumsfeld said last Friday that a nuclear test by North Korea would be a “failure of the international community.”  As of Sunday night, we were able to see the utter failure of the foreign policy of the United States and the UN leading all the way back to the early 1990’s. 

 

Even though this has been a failure of the international community, this failure was started with the practice of appeasement by the Clinton administration, and will continue all the way up through the handling of this situation. 

 

During the 1990’s, the Clinton administration treated the North Koreans like a child in the grocery store.  Parents know that kids always act up when they enter the candy section of the store.  When children see something they want, even if they know it isn’t good for them, will throw a fit to embarrass their parents to get what they want.  At this point the parents have two points.  One, the can give the child what they want and teach the child that throwing a fit gets what they desire, or two, take the child outside and give them a good spanking. 

 

The Clinton’s and the world community acted like typical liberals that believe you can reason with a three year old.  Hand over fist, North Korea was given what ever they wanted.  North Korea would say things like, “give us nuclear reactors or we will produce nuclear bombs.”  United States and the UN would say, “sure you can have them as long as you promise to stop production of nuclear weapons, but we aren’t going to make your prove that you stopped.  We will just take your word for it.”  There were no checks or reparations if North Korea failed to fulfill their obligations. 

 

In 2000 when President Bush became the new leader of the United States, a new tone of voice was being said to North Korea.  For the first time in eight years, the United States started sound like Robert Dinero in Casino.  The United States stands strong on its stance that says, “You can either be apart of the international community, receive technology, and better your economic standing or you can have nuclear weapons.  You can’t have both.”  Unfortunately, there is nothing the United States or the rest of the world community can do back up this statement. 

 

As stated earlier, the real failure will be how this situation is handled.  The hands of the United States are tied and we are forced to rely on other countries whom we should have no business trusting.  The first major error was to listen to the Chinese when they said they could handle the North Koreans and keep them from testing a nuclear devise.  Since saving face in Asia is very important, the Chinese are going to try to handle this situation and end this tension.  We need to understand however, that the time situation does not allow for either the Chinese or the South Koreans to ease tensions. 

 

Both the Chinese and the South Koreans are attempting to bring unification to the Korean peninsula, but their plan will take decades.  Neither side wants to see quick and massive change due to a refuge crisis that would occur; sending North Koreans either into China or South Korea.  Neither country could handle a large influx of refugees.

 

As usual the UN will sit there twiddling their thumbs, even with a new Secretary General from South Korea.  The members of the Security Council will not take any steps to correct these actions by the North Koreans, because of the two choices they could take.  Placing economic sanctions will do nothing to a country that is already isolated from the rest of the world and China would veto any resolution sending troops into the region. 

 

Now that we have seen what our so called allies can do with the situation, let’s look and see what the United States can do.  Survey says… Absolutely nothing.  Our only troops in the region would be over run by the North Koreans in under twenty minutes and using tactical nuclear weapons would only give an extra ten minutes of defense.  Any additional manpower is currently being utilized in other parts of the world. 

 

Right now our greatest hope is that Japan decided to amend their constitution to allow for the creation of an offensive military.  With Japan having the capability for offensive strikes against North Korea a lot of pressure would be taken off of the United States.  This however, would increase tensions between North Korea and the Japanese as well as bring back the historical problems between the South Koreans, China, and Japan. 

 

For once, I don’t have the answer.  All I know is this is turning into a giant cluster that will have repercussions throughout the world.  If a clear message is not sent to the North Koreans we are going to see other countries follow in the same path.  Nuclear weapons can generate a lot of money for a country on the black market, not to mention other countries that have stated publicly that they have a desire to acquire nuclear weapons despite world opinion.  The clear message must be sent now.     



Next 5 >>

<bgsound src="http://a420.v8383d.c8383.g.vm.akamaistream.net/7/420/8383/3b858b51/mtvrdstr.download.akamai.com/8512/wmp/4/1874/26248_1_1_04.asf" loop="infinite">