this republican convention is
making me SICK.
it's not just the
militarism, the blind patriotism, the brash nationalism, and the mindless cultural
populism (as exhibited in speeches, such as the one from the Tennessee
politician)--it's also the complete MISUNDERSTANDING of the lessons of the
defense and foreign policy issues they see as their strengths.
please see below...
National Defense
and the Troop Surge:
Whereas Barack Obama has touted his opposition to an
unpopular war that has devastated America’s reputation in the international
community, taken countless Iraqi men and women in addition to the brave
servicemen and servicewomen, and overextended our national budget to the point that
our dollar is freefalling, John McCain has emphasized the tactical
effectiveness of the now popular troop surge, which Barack Obama opposed.
The surge may have been militarily effective (though Iraqi
efforts—legislatively and militarily—were necessary), but Republicans never ask
1) Even if, over time—with tremendous cost in American lives, U.S. dollars, and
“collateral damage” among perhaps one MILLION citizens in Iraq—this is a battle
we CAN win, SHOULD we be fighting this battle? AND 2) What role has U.S.
foreign policy played in the phenomenon we witness today where Muslims from the
Third World (who once looked favorably upon the U.S.) are so hell-bent on
fighting a war with America? The obvious
and rational and central-intelligence-supported conclusion is 1) Iraq had
NOTHING to do with 9/11, had NO ties to Osama bin Laden (who, during the Gulf
War, volunteered to send mujahedeen to Saudi Arabia to fight Saddam Hussein if
he should invade the Muslim Holy Land), posed NO credible threat to U.S.
Homeland Security, AND THAT BUSH-CHENEY KNEW IT ALL ALONG, and 2) That unconstitutional
U.S. interventionism in the Muslim World is the fundamental cause of animosity
between al-Qaeda and America; moreover the phenomenon has a name—“blowback”—a CIA
term for the unintended consequences of U.S. military/special ops/counter-intelligence
in foreign nations.
Yes, without the troop-surge, the situation in Iraq would be
more chaotic today than it was last year.
HOWEVER, we would not have needed the troop surge, the staggering debts,
the redeployments (stats are out today that suicides among military personnel
hit an all-time high this year), the death toll, the original invasion (which WE
committed in the War in Iraq), etc. if we had followed the Constitution, international
conventions codified into U.S. law, and the sage advice of our Founding
Fathers. Barack Obama was, therefore,
ABSOLUTELY CORRECT to oppose the War in Iraq from the beginning, to vote
AGAINST THE TROOP SURGE AND THE FUNDING OF THE WAR’S EXPANSION IN ORDER TO
FORCE BUSH TO BRING THE TROOPS HOME.
Congress alone has the right to declare war. Congress has the power of the purse to reign
in the excesses of the executive branch and bring it into subjection to the
will of the people (whose fortunes it lives and breathes and grows on). It was NOT un-American and un-patriotic to
say in the only words our imperial president understands, “BRING THE TROOPS
HOME! TAKE THEM OUT OF HARM’S WAY! STOP WASTING AMERICA’S FORTUNE, LIVES, REPUTATION,
AND FUTURE. STOP THIS MADNESS
LAWLESSNESS NOW!!!”
Because Bush-Cheney has royally mucked up Iraq, I can
understand the argument for nation-building in Iraq; though I do not think it
is our business, it is the least we can do—and it seems to be the only lesson the
current administration learned from our past history in the Middle East (specifically,
the Soviet-Afghan War—implied in Charlie
Wilson’s War).
The Myth of
American (and Republican) Exceptionalism:
Vladimir Putin has repeatedly cited the Bush-Cheney invasion
of Iraq to justify Russia’s invasion of Georgia and the goal of forcible regime
change from the outside (forbidden by international law, the NATO charter, and
the treaties of the United States of America) to “liberate” South Ossetia from
Georgian “aggression”—echoing Bush-Cheney rhetoric when WMDs failed to turn up
in Iraq—as the moral high ground from which they carried out a far larger
genocide than the one they “opposed.”
America once held and practiced exceptional ideals. Since the Spanish-American War, though, we
have been no different that the petty European rivals who fought costly wars
for the sake of regional (or global) hegemony.
Cindy McCain is DEAD WRONG when she implies that America—as a
global power—is morally exceptional. She
is also wrong that the lying, cheating, thoroughly-corrupted Republican Party
is “better” than the Democratic Party. The
Washington John McCain opposes is the Washington dominated for a decade by
Republicans in each of the three branches of the federal government. In John McCain’s defense, he has opposed SOME
of the most extremely reckless fiscal policies of the Bush administration and
the use of torture to interrogate prisoners of war. However, he has been a REPEATED proponent of
PREMPTIVE MILITARY ACTION and has pledged to continue to “TAKE THE OFFENSIVE IN
THE WAR ON TERROR.” This is NOT
change. This is a third term for the
reckless and unconstitutional foreign policy of George W. Bush.
McCain opposes earmarks (though Gov. Sarah Palin does only
when it is politically expedient), but earmarks make up a negligible portion of
government expenditures. While Obama
would, likely, ratchet up the debt even more than John McCain, the best
estimates show that the McCain tax cuts, COUPLED WITH EVEN MORE GOVERNMENT "SOLUTIONS" would add HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of dollars to the already unprecedented BUSH DEFICITS. This, too, is NOT change. This is a third term for the reckless and
unconstitutional economic policy of George W. Bush.
PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE, AMERICA, DO NOT BE TAKEN IN BY EITHER OF THE TWO MAJOR PARTY CANDIDATES OR THEIR RUNNING MATES. THEY ARE MORE OF THE SAME, SPECIAL-INTEREST PURCHASED, WASHINGTON INSIDERS THAT ARE WILLING TO TAKE YOUR FORTUNES AND YOUR PEACE AND YOUR SECURITY THROUGH ILL-CONCEIVED, ILLEGAL, ECONOMIC AND FOREIGN POLICIES. PLEASE VOTE THIRD PARTY THIS NOVEMBER TO EXPRESS YOUR DISSATISFACTION WITH WASHINGTON POLITICS AS USUAL.
In Liberty,
Jonathan
Chatboard (0)