KurtulanBelhaven Babacik
Ice_Aged_I
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit Ice_Aged_I's Xanga Site!

Name: Steve
Gender: Male


Interests: Almost everything...
Expertise: Chili-making!
Occupation: Consulting
Industry: Research


Message: message me
Website: visit my website


Member Since: 4/14/2006

SubscriptionsSites I Read
trksh
Themitt

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Sunday, October 21, 2007

On Victory...

“When we submit to sin, yielding to its imperious demands, it is not a matter of yielding to the inevitable or reverting to type.  We are foolishly, perversely allowing sin to dominate us when in actual fact it has neither the right nor the power to do so.  We have been taken once and for all out of its territory, out of the state where it holds men and women captive and in chains.  Therefore, when we submit to sin and temptation, as if it had mastery, we are like freed slaves going back into the house of their former bondage and obeying their old owner.  By Christ’s redeeming act at Calvary we were brought out of the slave market of the world, ransomed from Satan, sin, and death.  No one now but He who bought us has any rights over us: ‘the accuser of the brethren’ has no ground on which to claim us; the powers of the demonic cannot pluck us from the safety of Christ’s hands; the world’s standards and priorities (and our own old standards and priorities) of self-centeredness and self-advancement cannot compel us since we have a new motivation, another goal, and an indwelling Spirit by which to reach it.”

 Peter Lewis, The Glory of Christ (Chicago: Moody Press, 1997), p. 341.


Sunday, October 14, 2007

Currently Reading
Science and the Trinity: The Christian Encounter with Reality
By John Polkinghorne
see related

God’s Response to “Protest Atheism”

In his superb book, Understanding the Trinity (p. 101-102), Oxford theologian Alister McGrath addresses the issue of so-called ‘protest atheism’. He explains this 20th-century phenomenon thus:  a protest “directed against the image of a God who stands aloof from his world while…suffering continues.”  As an answer to this protest and as a defense of the Christian doctrine of the Incarnation, McGrath quotes – in its entirety – a striking playlet. 

The Long Silence

At the end of time, billions of people were scattered on a great plain before God's throne. Most shrank back from the brilliant light before them. But some groups near the front talked heatedly – not with cringing shame, but with belligerence.

‘Can God judge us? How can He know about suffering?’ snapped a pert young brunette. She ripped open a sleeve to reveal a tattooed number from a Nazi concentration camp. ‘We endured terror, beatings, torture and death!’ In another group, a Negro boy lowered his collar. ‘What about this?’ he demanded, showing an ugly rope burn. ‘Lynched, for no crime but being black!’ In another crowd, there was a pregnant schoolgirl with sullen eyes: ‘Why should I suffer?’ she murmured. ‘It wasn't my fault.’

Far out across the plain were hundreds of such groups. Each had a complaint against God for the evil and suffering He had permitted in his world.  How lucky God was to live in heaven where all was sweetness and light, where there was no weeping or fear, no hunger or hatred. What did God know of all that man had been forced to endure in this world? For God leads a pretty sheltered life, they said.

So each of these groups sent forth their leader, chosen because he had suffered the most. A Jew, a Negro, a person from Hiroshima, a horribly deformed arthritic, a thalidomide child. In the centre of the plain they consulted with each other. At last they were ready to present their case. It was rather clever.

Before God could be qualified to be their judge, He must endure what they had endured. Their decision was that God should be sentenced to live on earth – as a man!

‘Let him be born a Jew. Let the legitimacy of his birth be doubted. Give him a work so difficult that even his family will think him out of his mind when he tries to do it.  Let him be betrayed by his closest friends. Let him face false charges, be tried by a prejudiced jury, and convicted by a cowardly judge. Let him be tortured.  At the last, let him see what it means to be terribly alone. Then let him die.  Let him die so that there can be no doubt he died. Let there be a host of witnesses to verify it.’

As each leader announced his portion of the sentence, loud murmurs of approval went up from the throng of people assembled. And when the last had finished pronouncing sentence, there was a long silence. No one uttered another word. No one moved.  For suddenly all knew that God had already served His sentence.


Monday, March 26, 2007

Currently Reading
Dawkins' God: Genes, Memes, and the Meaning of Life
By Alister McGrath
see related

Faith...what it is

While reading Alister McGrath's newish book (thanks again, Peter), Dawkins' God, I came across this superb definition of faith by W.H. Griffith Thomas (1861-1924): 

"[Faith] affects the whole of man's nature.  It commences with the conviction of the mind based on adequate evidence; it continues in the confidence of the heart or emotions based on conviction, and it is crowned in the consent of the will, by means of which the conviction and confidence are expressed in conduct."
                                                                                                                                          (The Principles of Theology, 1930)


Friday, September 29, 2006

Currently Listening
20th Anniversary
By The Rippingtons
see related

Imaginative prayer

Quoted in a devotional by Selwyn Hughes:

One can never become proficient in prayer until the imagination has been redeemed.

The writter's point is that, if one desires proficiency in prayer, he/she must first be saved from self-absorption and sin-concentration.  In other words, God must be the primary focus in prayer.  Thus,  prayer should never be mainly about us and our problems, desires and issues (our "normal" tendency is often to give God our "wish list", isn't it?); rather, it must be focused on the Creator -- His glory, character and purposes.


Wednesday, August 30, 2006

on freedom...

In the most recent (double) issue of WORLD magazine [September 2/9, 2006 vol. 21, no. 34, p. 39], editor Marvin Olasky interviews theologian Miroslav Volf.  Check out what Volf has to say about freedom:

"Freedom isn't just a matter of will; it's a matter of being.  And that's where certain forms of constraint of freedom can legitimately come in.  Why?  Because our desires are often not in sync with who we truly are as creatures of God.  Unconstrained, we work against ourselves and generate our own slavery -- sometimes even pleasant slavery for a while, but slavery nonetheless -- as those addicted to drugs, pornography, gambling, or anything else will attest.

When God commands us sinners how to live, we experience God's commands as constraint.  But what the commands really do is simply tell us what it means to live in sync with ourselves as God's creatures."



Next 5 >>