1. According to Senator Hillary Clinton, she is in the lead in popular IF you include Michigan/Florida and exclude caucus states. How can you cry "disenfranchisement" of Michigan/Florida (even though you said in October that they didn't count) but want to exclude the caucus states which effectively disenfranchises THE CAUCUS STATES? Isn't that called hypocrisy?

2. Senator Clinton and the media seem to have made up this narrative that Obama has trouble with "working class, low income, no college degree white people" just because he lost Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia. I guess ALLLLLLL the other white people (and blacks) who voted for Obama were all elite, PhD having, Ivy League educated, high income people. Why is it that only the whites in Ohio, Pennsylvania, and WV can't vote for Obama? Why is it that they are somehow the "standard" for all working class whites?

3. Going back to Michigan and Florida. I'm all for people's votes counting but why is there such a big fuss over their votes? The Democratic Party of both states BROKE THE RULES and moved up their primary thus being stripped of their delegates. That's THEIR fault, not anybody elses. They f'ed it up for themselves but we're all (mainly Hillary) trying to find a way to seat their delegates. Whats the point of having rules when they're just going to be overturn? I don't understand how Barack is being made the bad guy about not counting the votes when he AND John Edwards followed the rules and didn't campaign there.

4. They say that the caucuses are un-democratic. Why? In a caucus, you can't lie about who you vote for. You can't tell someone you'll vote for Candidate A but at the polls, vote for Candidate B. However, you CAN lie at a primary. So wouldn't caucuses actually be MORE democratic? Hillary lost most of the caucuses because she wasn't as organized as Obama. Whose fault is that? Don't write off and disenfranchise the caucus goers just because your organization skills suck.

5. Why is it that everytime Obama wins a state, the MSM always attributes it to a high African American turnout? While it may be true that it was a high AA turnout, clearly the majority of people in every state is white. It's like their deliberately trying to infer that black people are only voting for Obama because he's black (well, technically bi-racial).

6. Last one, Hillary's campaign are trying to make the argument that they can win the "big" states even going so far as to use Electoral College delegates. However, she won the big states in a DEMOCRATIC primary, not a general election which means that its only democrats (or Operation Chaos Republicans) voting. So how does winning big states mean that you'll automatically win them in the general election when clearly, the Democrat that won Texas in the last 8 primary elections LOST them in the general election?

This was moreso a rant than questions.... But feel free to answer if you want.

Peace up, A-town down

P.S. Have anyone noticed that at Hillary rallies they often chant "Yes SHE can" or "Hill-ar-y" but at Obama rallies they always chant "Yes WE Can"?