Couldn't Resist:"If we are really going to have an effect…

"We are made to persist....	...that's how we find out who we are."

About this Entry
Posted by: Lissilote Original: 5/7/2008 11:58 AM Comments: 4 eProps: 8 Read Comments Post a Comment Back to Your Xanga Site

Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps from: Elenlote BronzeBow_Samson joe_the_somebody dimple_92

Read or Post Comments

Wednesday, May 07, 2008

Couldn't Resist:

"If we are really going to have an effect on controlling our border, we can't be having eight-to-ten year delays on these really small sections [of the fence]," Rep. Duncan Hunter said. "I think we actually waited a full year on a study to see if the gnatcatcher would fly over the fence. While we were analyzing that, tons of cocaine were coming over that border."

Posted 5/7/2008 11:58 AM - 4 comments

recommend
recs0
give stars
votes0
email
sent0

Give eProps or Post a Comment

4 Comments

its true that fencing is very helpful in certian areas.
its just fencing the ENTIRE border(or even almost entire border) that is really stupid.

debate never dies.

Posted 5/7/2008 6:02 PM by Elenlote - reply

Debate nerd!

lol! Just kidding...

Posted 5/8/2008 12:02 AM by BronzeBow_Samson - reply

bleh. i came up with a plan early on in the year risa that would've solved all of this...

mandate 1: dig a new canal between mexico and the US since we have now lost control of the panama canal and need a new one anyways

advantages:

a. moat

illegal immigrants will now be forced to swim a huge canal in order to get from mexico to the US

b. negated effects of gobal warming

by digging yet another canal we will decrease the ocean's level by an inch or so, helping to negate the effects of global warming. al gore will back us up on that being a good thing.

c. beautiful landscape.

developers will now be able to sell homes to clients on this new canal with the added bonus of beautiful hills on the mexican side of the canal instead of desert to look at. water, hills...a buyers paradise.

d. revenue

by building a new canal and keeping control of it the US will no longer be forced to send US traffick through the panama canal.

impacts: drug cartels lose money, us economy helped, and bugs bunny becomes your best friend.

...the only holdup to the plan was the lack of solvency authors. *sighs* why can't people be more creative?

Posted 5/8/2008 9:59 AM by joe_the_somebody - reply

lol! You're still researching?!? Risa, I know it's hard to give up a debate resolution, espesially one as good as illegal immigration, but you have to let it go!

ask;drgfe;rgjkl

-Chad

P.S. I emailed Anthony my Fence Solvencey, (at his request!) so my argument will be at nationals! W00T!

Posted 5/10/2008 11:12 PM by dimple_92 - reply

Choose Identity

Xanga Network

Anonymous (Sign up for free!)

Give eProps (?)

2 eProps

1 eProp

0 ePropsComment Only

Post a Comment

Add Link | Preview HTML

comment help

Say it with Minis! (?)
- Oh yeah?! Well...you...
- Good night!
- Thanks for Sharing!
- Ninja attack!
View All Minis »
[mini text]

[mini credits]

reset

Profile Pic:

Default | Choose » (?)

Back to Lissilote's Xanga Site!

Note: your comment will appear in Lissilote's local time zone:
GMT -08:00 (Pacific Standard - US, Canada)

Say it with Minis! (?)

Welcome to Xanga!

Stay connected!

Say it with Minis!