STEVENPILL
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit STEVENPILL's Xanga Site!

Name: Steven
Gender: Male


Message: message me
Yahoo: smpill@yahoo.com


Member Since: 10/10/2006

SubscriptionsSites I Read
i_found
AG_and_friends
TheTheologiansCafe

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Saturday, September 06, 2008

"Hounddog" Withdrawn!

Dear Readers:

This Friday, I received a somewhat rueful message of congratulations from Eric Parkinson, the CEO of distribution for Empire Film Group.  According to him, more than 200 theaters across the country had cancelled their scheduled screenings of  the motion picture "Hounddog", citing pressure from "vocal groups".  Indeed, the groups he mentioned were all ones that I have ties to and/or am a member of.  Judging from Mr. Parkinson's words in all our correspondences, it would seem that the film is, to all intents and purposes, withdrawn from the theater circuit and will not be released on September 19th as previously announced.

Needless to say, I welcome this news.  It is, in many ways, a personal vindication after so many months of research and personal sacrifice.  While I will, for ethical reasons, refrain from any quotations from his text, I wish, for the record, to commend Mr. Parkinson; both for his decision to accept this situation and for the graciousness of his message to me.  What follows is my reply to him.  I hope that it reflected the same courtesy in return.

Dear Mr. Parkinson:

As I've said before, I grant you a measure of sympathy insofar as the business angle of this matter is concerned.  You were, indeed, handed a loser in the worst sense of the term and tasked with turning a profit from it... despite its unremitting record of disaster.  God knows what Bornstein was thinking!  In any case, even without the opposition of Christian and parents' organizations, this film would have been a bomb.  You couldn't have prevented that.  Its fate will be the same as Kampmeier's depraved "Virgin" movie- a single, dust-covered DVD in the back row of a Blockbuster outlet.  That's where I found it.

Look at it this way.  You and your company have been spared a profound embarrassment in the long run.  Yes, I'm aware you've put a lot of funds into its recent revamping... just as The Motion Picture Group had before you.  But- again- I submit to you that it was an ill-considered and foredoomed project from the start.  Had you pressed it further, you would have only been throwing good money after bad.  Take a little comfort from that.

But that is only from the business side.  Naturally, my concerns were based on the moral aspects.  I've written continuously about the dangers of this film to children; to you, on my website and to many others over a 26 month period.  I won't bore you with a rehash here.  But I DO believe that a heightened understanding among the parents and citizens of this country in regard to the culture is presenting itself.  This is not, as you infer, any suppression of freedom.  Rather, it is a recommitment to the most basic responsibility of adults in any free society; the protection, nurturement and moral guidance of children.  It's what civilization itself is for.  "Hounddog" represents Hollywood's most profound denial of this to date.

From the onset of my involvement in this sad affair, I made this my watchword:  There can be no moral basis for the sexual exploitation of a child.  I'm looking at those words now- faded writing on a scrap of memo paper lying beneath my monitor these past two years. They represent, to me, the wisest thought that ever impinged on my decrepit baby-boomer brain!  But, then again, they merely express what shoud be (and once was) a statement of the most basic morality of all.  I was only restating a traditional and universal truth.  No real wisdom was needed.

I urge you and your company to refrain from viewing this as a defeat.  Instead, think of it as a God-given deliverance, a lesson and a challenge.  Filmmaking is more than just a high-powered, high-risk and (potentially) high-gain profession.  It is also an institution of public trust.  Your products do more than just make money for your stockholders and boost the notoriety of actors and directors (for better or worse).  They can also elevate the spirit of an entire nation, uphold its virtues, inspire the best from its children and provide America's "best foot forward" to a turbulent and increasingly savage world... as it once did.  Or it can do, as it often has in the recent past, the precise opposite.  As I've often said, there is no such thing as JUST a movie.

Don't fight us, Eric.  Join with us.  Your company can be on the right side of history.  Empire could work to reverse the decline of Hollywood by reviving its best and most responsible traditions.  That's where true art lies... not in the depictions of mindless, graphic violence- or in the vilifying of the American nation- or, particularly, in the degradation of America's children.

Dakota Fanning- "Hounddog's" now-fallen little star- had a similar opportunity.  She came within an inch of becoming the living face of her entire generation... and for all the right reasons.  But "Hounddog" finished all that.  Likely, it also finished the decent essence of all she once was.  That was the true source of her once-phenomenal popularity.  Her loss is her young generation's loss.  It's our's as well.  And now, regrettably, other child stars are already following in her footsteps.  It's fast becoming her legacy... a far cry from what it might have been.

It needn't be your's.  Let the future deeds of Empire Film Group reflect their higher ideals.  I assure you, a vast audience is waiting to beat a path to your door.  All you have to do is make it worth their while.

Sincerely yours;

Steven Mark Pilling

P.S.  In answer to your query:  I had no direct word from my sources that any boycott was in the works... although I suspected it.  I'm a member, subscriber and/or frequent poster on the websites of those organizations you mentioned and some others besides.  I've likewise had the honor to exchange a few messages with the heads of those groups and provide them with sources of information and a few of my own insights.  However, I think you overestimate my importance in this.  By and large, I'm just a lone blogger doing what he felt called upon to do.  

 


Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Kultur Kwizz- Part XI

41.  What natural event drove the British Army out of Washington DC during the War of 1812?

A) Hurricane  B) Earthquake  C) Tornado  D) Locusts

42.  What was the name of the TV game show emceed by Johnny Carson prior to his hosting "The Tonight Show"?

A) To Tell The Truth  B) I've Got a Secret  C) Video Village  D) Who Do You Trust

43.  Bronze is an alloy of what two elements?

A) Antimony & bismuth  B) Stannum & cuprum  C) Manganese & cobalt  D) Beryllium & sulfur

44.  The song "God Bless America" was originally made popular by what singer?

A) Kate Smith  B) Vera Lynn  C) Anita Bryant  D) Cyndi Lauper   


Monday, August 25, 2008

A Case Of Infanticide

Dear Readers:

Yesterday, I encountered a column here on Xanga dealing with the story of a woman who killed her two year old nephew.  Besides the disturbing nature of the crime itself, there was a unusual circumstance.  The woman in question weighs half a ton!  She is so obese that she can't even fit through the door of her house.  The local sheriff refuses to take responsibility for her incarceration.

I suggested (half in jest) a rather extreme remedy!  But, as in any question of the killing of a child, serious moral issues are involved.  A responder mentioned that people are naturally moved more by the murder of a child than that of- say- a thirty-two year old man.  This was my reply.

Dear Benjimon:

Certainly, we are naturally "programmed" in this manner.  All life on Earth that gives live birth to its young and forms family units and, thereby, tends to be protective.  It's a survival trait... and humans are the supreme example.  It's likewise the basis of our highest moral imperative.  Like I've constantly said, the purpose of adults is the protection, nurturement and moral guidance of children.  When we fail in this, we fail in all.

Children are all-important, as they are the future and are born utterly helpless.  Young women are important because they bear children and need support in the process.  Old people are important because they provide domestic help and life experience.  Able bodied men, however, are expendable in their behalf.  It's our lot in life.  Civilized values tend to reflect this, as it is our natural state.

If a woman kills a man, it is still, of course, murder.  However, under such circumstances, a question of self-defense might well be raised.  For a two year old child, there can be no such question.  It can only be a matter of accident or willful infanticide.  If the latter, it's not only murder, but a crime against nature itself. 

If the death penalty is ever morally applicable, it is so here.

Questions or comments?   


Wednesday, August 20, 2008

God Vs. Country?

Dear Readers:

In an ongoing debate with a "religious left" individual on another website, I have attempted to make the case that socialism and Christianity are ultimately incompatible.  The left (naturally!) disagrees.  While I welcome a free, honest debate, I am always struck by the fact (as I have been since the 1960's) at the inability of leftists to be honest with their very selves.  Indeed, their continual reversion to rhetorical gimmickry, personal attacks and attempts to redefine both the issue and their opponent's position, characterize them.  It also, to the discerning onlooker, lays bare their underlying falsity of purpose.  When my debator tried to condemn my patriotism as ungodly (whereas the liberal dogma is not!) I had this reply.

Dear Caddy:

Where have I ever said that Man is to be exhalted over God?  I haven't.  Nor would I ever.  This is precisely at the basis of MY points of contention.  Its antithesis is the one that you yourself seek to falsely promulgate.

This lies at the heart of my conviction that socialism is in inherent conflict with the tenets of Christianity.  Socialism equates humanism... and humanism places Man in the center of the universe- not God.  I have said this over and over.  Yet, with the calculated duplicity to which only a dedicated liberal can aspire, you repeatedly twist my words 180 degrees.

Once again:  I'm proud to be an American and take pride in my country's heritage and achievements.  This is not a "selfish" gesture by any means.  Nor is it anti-Christian.  America was conceived in Christian principles, is a Christian nation and owes its success and prosperity to that fact.  It is only when false and ego-driven doctrines have held sway over us that we, as a nation, have faltered.  As a patriotic American, I hold against those false doctrines... for my benefit, for that of my posterity, for the enhancement of America's greatness and goodness as an example to other nations and, above all, for the eternal Glory of God.  These things are not incompatible... as the Founding Fathers bespoke.

One does not, as you suggest, reject God by loving one's country.  One truely rejects God by attempting to further perverse dogmas in His name.


Friday, August 01, 2008

Kultur Kwizz- Part X

37.  What future American president led the decisive attack at the Battle of Buena Vista?

A) Ulysses S. Grant  B) Abraham Lincoln  C) Millard Fillmore  D) Jefferson Davis

38.  The nearest star to the Solar System is:

A) Tau Ceti  B) Rigilkent  C) Wolf 359  D) Nemesis

39.  Which is the oldest commissioned warship in the United States Navy?

A) USS Arizona  B) USS Constellation  C) USS Constitution  D) USS Texas

40.  Which American general was is the only one to be awarded (posthumously) an honorary six-star rank?

A) George Washington  B) George Marshall  C) Dwight D. Eisenhower  D) "Chesty" Puller

I've pulled a few sneaks in these questions.  Be warned!!



Next 5 >>