|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| Such an encouraging interview... Real Answers for Real LeadersOne-time Medtronic CEO Bill George, author of Authentic Leadership and True North, reveals what he's learned about leadership
| |
The early part of this decade was a dismal period for business leadership. Enron, Adelphia, WorldCom, Xerox, Tyco, Global Crossing, Arthur Andersen -- all of these massive economic stalwarts were damaged or destroyed by leadership failures. A 2002 Gallup Poll found that the public had such a negative view of business that only 5 of 24 business and industry sectors were viewed positively. In 2003, a Gallup Poll reported that a mere 18% of the public rated the "honesty and ethics" of business executives as high or very high (in comparison, 25% said the same of journalists, 16% for lawyers, and 9% for HMO managers). (See "Health Care, Lawyers, Energy and Accounting Suffer in Public's Eye" and "Honesty, Ethics in Professions" in the "See Also" area on this page.)  |
So when Bill George's book Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value came out in 2003, it felt like a breath of fresh air. The book asserted that sustainable business value is created by leaders with morals -- people who lead with vision, passion, motivation, and concern for customers and employees, not "golden boys" who leave a trail of dead in their wake. George had the credibility to make these claims: As the CEO of Medtronic, the world's leading medical technology firm, George increased the company's market cap by 35% a year, taking the company from $1.1 billion to $60 billion in 10 years. Currently, he is a professor of management practice at Harvard Business School and sits on the boards of some of the most successful companies in America: ExxonMobil, Goldman Sachs, and Novartis. Meanwhile, the idea of authentic leadership was catching on. In fact, within a couple of years, so many successful companies had incorporated George's vision into their leadership strategies, it was hard to remember that it was ever a new idea. But George wasn't done. (See "Leadership Is a Process, Not a Role" in the "See Also" area on this page.) Shortly after Authentic Leadership came out, George started interviewing more leaders. In the end, he spoke to 125 leaders in the realms of business, academics, politics, and social service -- all of them, he says, authentic, world-class leaders. He realized that there was more to authentic leadership than even he knew, and with the help of Peter Sims, George wrote True North: Discover Your Authentic Leadership, released by Jossey-Bass last month. The book covers the traits and development path of great leaders, how they became who they are, how they maintain their qualities, and how they empower others to lead. In this interview, the first of a two-part series, George elaborates on the book and explains what he's discovered. He discusses what authentic leadership really is, the characteristics of great leaders, and how good leaders can lose their way and how they can come back -- and what happens if they don't. GMJ: The idea of True North is based on authentic leadership. What is an authentic leader? Bill George: Being an authentic leader means being true to who you are and what you believe in. You understand the purpose of your leadership, and you practice your values consistently. It's not just about having good values, but actually practicing them, especially under pressure. It's about leading with your heart, not just your head -- so you're leading as a whole person. And when I talk about matters of the heart, I'm referring to qualities like empathy, compassion, passion, and courage. GMJ: What do you mean by "true north"? George: "True north" came out of the 125 interviews we did. We asked people what enabled them to become effective leaders. They told us that staying true to what they believed helped them, despite the pressures and seductions of the real world. They fully acknowledged that there are tremendous temptations out there. There are a lot of gray areas in business; it's not all black and white. Most people know what their true north is. But the deeper questions are: Have you developed yourself as a leader? When you're under pressure and you start to deviate, does your inner compass click in and pull you back to your true north? Are you grounded enough to know that you're getting off track? Or do you get into trouble by not paying attention to your true north, little by little, bit by bit? So many leaders who've gotten themselves into deep trouble started out with just a few minor deviations. We learned that the hardest person you'll ever have to lead is yourself. If you can lead yourself, leading others is easy. GMJ:What do you mean by trouble? Bad stock price? Legal trouble? George: It's definitely not a bad stock price. It's the trouble that comes from looking for glory, seeking to aggrandize yourself at the expense of the organization. This kind of trouble can be fatal. For instance, leaders who are under pressure from the stock market often rationalize their outcomes. They don't tell people honestly that they fell short, they made a mistake, they missed their numbers -- they tend to rationalize those things. Or they feel like they're imposters, and so they put on airs, [pretending to be] something they're not or totally on top of it all when they know they've had difficulties. Or they may turn inward, and if they haven't developed a support team that will give them help and candid feedback, they may refuse to accept input from others. They may not use their own staff, isolating themselves from people in their organizations because they don't want to be criticized, don't want to hear bad news. They may surround themselves with sycophants who give them good news, so loyalty becomes more of a [valued] quality in that organization than meritocracy. Authentic leaders form deep, long-term, connected relationships. They have self-discipline in their personal and professional lives and consistently deliver good results. GMJ: What happens to people who head down this path? George: Usually, they derail and wind up going off the track. They may destroy their companies in the process, unless the board sees what's happening and gets them out of there first. Whether you're talking Phil Purcell at Morgan Stanley or Bob Nardelli at Home Depot, the board has to act. Sometimes people just lose their jobs and don't know why, and they have to go through a difficult time to recognize what happened. That's a key time, and they may come back stronger if they realize early on that they've been through a crucible -- and if they realize that leadership is not about them, but about serving other people. GMJ: Explain how crucibles -- or any intense test or trial -- contributes to leadership growth. George: We all have to develop ourselves. So the question is: Do we understand crucibles and use them to grow? Can we frame the events of our lives in such a way that they can become empowering experiences? I don't know of anyone who's gotten through life in a leadership role and not had significant problems. Some people have the advice of a great mentor or counselor, but even they have to go through a difficult period to gain self-awareness. Self-awareness is hard to gain, and we never stop learning it. There are two kinds of leaders: takers and givers. That's why we wrote the chapter "Transformation From 'I' to 'We.'" You make this transition when you understand that leading is not about you. It's about serving other people. That's the key transition people make. Often, it takes a crucible to enable them to realize what their leadership is all about. Am I here just to make money for myself? Or am I here to help develop other people and to serve other people? Givers understand their purpose, and they stay true to it. In spite of all the pressure, they do not bow or bend. GMJ: What are the characteristics of a leader who's following his or her true north? George: Leadership is not about getting people to follow you, but empowering other people to step up and lead. It's not like it was in the 1950s and '60s, when we'd all follow the great leader over the hill, and we'd wait in line for 20 years to get that promotion. Today, leaders want to empower people at very young ages. One of the leaders from the book, Jaime Irick, wrote me today to tell me he was just made the general manager of a $50 million business at General Electric. That's an organization that wants to empower young leaders. GE knows in such a diverse business, it can't just have people on top who are really smart. It's got to have people throughout the organization who are empowered to step up and lead. GMJ: What you're talking about sounds like the opposite of leadership by bullying. George: Absolutely. Bullying is basically saying, "I've got the answers, and your job is to follow me." That form of leadership cannot be sustained. You can get short-term results by laying off tens of thousands of people, but you cannot get long-term results, nor can you sustain a great enterprise that way. GMJ: What would you say are the characteristics of a really great leader? George: They really care about the people they're working with. They have the capacity to inspire and empower others around a common mission or purpose, like Jim Burke did at Johnson & Johnson, Sam Palmisano at IBM, and Anne Mulcahy at Xerox. I think the best example I can give you of a truly great leader is Andrea Jung at Avon. She has more than five million people working for her, most of them Avon representatives. Jung's sole purpose is the empowerment of women. When the business went through a difficult time -- revenues grew 5% and earnings were flat; the market just killed Avon stock -- Jung said, "Look, we're not going to estimate earnings anymore. I'm going to reinvent myself as a leader and change the way things are run around here. We're going to reinvest everything in building the business for the future." Then she went out and got the first license for direct selling in China. They already have more than 100,000 reps there, and I wouldn't be surprised if they had a million reps in China in five years. That's the kind of leader I'm talking about -- one who is authentic, will acknowledge her shortcomings, and come back stronger. GMJ: You interviewed 125 world-class leaders for the book. Did you learn anything you didn't already know? George: Absolutely. I didn't have the idea of true north going in, and I hadn't thought as much about the idea of an inner compass. We learned a lot about how people think about building their support teams with their personal board of directors. (See "Building a Career on Your Strengths" and "What's in the Way?" in the "See Also" area on this page.) We learned a lot about how people stay true to their values under pressure and how they can deviate and pull themselves back into line. We didn't know how important our life stories are. We learned that our life stories are so much more important than our traits, characteristics, leadership styles, or the training programs that companies teach about competencies and skills. Those pale by comparison with the importance of knowing your life story and being true to it. GMJ: The life stories in your book were fairly dramatic. Some of them were just heart wrenching. But a miserable childhood inspiring great success is a classic American story. Now, what if you grew up in a nice neighborhood with decent parents and went to a good school? What can one draw from that? George: That's the Wendy Kopp story. When she got to Princeton, she realized how few people have access to the kind of education she had. She realized how unfair it is that so many smart and capable people endure a truly bad educational system, and she got outraged by the inequities of that. So she started Teach for America. As a matter of fact, some of the people who have the most difficulty grew up in wealthy families. I'm shocked at what a large percentage of my students at Harvard are "overcomers." You have no idea how high that percentage is. Even people who grow up in the kind of idyllic circumstances you describe have big issues: Did my father really love me? Can I live up to my parents' example? Do I want to? That's when you have to take control of your own life and say, "I am who I am; this is who I am." That's how we develop self-awareness, and self-awareness is critical to leaders. -- Interviewed by Jennifer Robison *Taken from the Gallup Management Journal, April 12, 2007. Source: http://gmj.gallup.com. | | |
| Lionhearted and Lamblike: The Christian Husband as Head, Part 1March 18, 2007 By John Piper Read, listen, or watch this resource on our website. Ephesians 5:21-33
Submit to one another out of reverence for Christ. 22 Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. 23 For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. 24 Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. 25 Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her, 26 that he might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word, 27 so that he might present the church to himself in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. 28 In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. 29 For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church, 30 because we are members of his body. 31 “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” 32 This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church. 33 However, let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband.
If the Lord wills, both today and next week we will focus on what it means for a married man to be the head of his wife and of his home. We focus on this for two reasons. One is that the Bible says in Ephesians 5:23, “The husband is the head of the wife as Christ is the head of the church.” We need to know what the Bible means by this statement so that we can exult in it and obey. The other reason is that few things are more broken in our day than manhood and headship in relation to women and families. And the price of this brokenness is enormous and touches almost every facet of life. So for the sake of faithful biblical exposition and exultation, and for the sake of recovering biblical manhood and Christ-exalting family structures, we will, Lord willing, spend two weeks on this important issue of headship. First Things FirstOur emphasis in these weeks so far has been that staying married is not mainly about staying in love, but about keeping covenant. We did eventually come around to saying that precisely by this unwavering covenant-keeping the possibility of being profoundly in love in forty years is much greater than if you think of the task of marriage is first staying in love. Keeping first things first makes second things better. Staying in love isn’t the first task of marriage. It is a happy overflow of covenant-keeping for Christ’s sake. We have spent most of our effort in these five messages so far pondering the foundations of covenant-keeping in the way Christ keeps covenant with us. We have looked at marriage as a showcase of covenant-keeping grace and as a combination of forgiveness and forbearance. And the last time we were together we took up the question: Can you help each other change? And if so, how do you do that graciously? Headship Seen in Light of the GospelUp till now we have spent little time on the distinct roles of husband and wife—headship and submission. This was intentional. Foundations in the gospel are needed before these things can shine with the beauty they really have. There is nothing ugly or undesirable in these distinctions of headship and submission when they’re seen in the light of the gospel of grace. So now the question presses on us: What is headship? And what is submission? The plan is to deal with headship in the next two weeks and then after Easter deal with submission and other issues relating to marriage. This week will be largely foundation for headship, and next week will be largely application. What does it actually look like in practice? The Mystery RevealedLet’s move into this text at verse 31. It’s a quote from Genesis 2:24: “Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” In the next verse (v. 32), Paul looks back on this quote and says, “This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church.” Now why is the coming together of a man and woman to form one flesh in marriage called a mystery? Mystery in the New Testament does not mean something too complex or deep or obscure or distant for humans to understand. It refers to a hidden purpose of God that is now revealed for our understanding and enjoyment. Paul explains what the mystery is in verse 32. The marriage union is a mystery, he says, because its deepest meaning has been concealed by God during the Old Testament history, but is now being openly revealed by the apostle, namely, that marriage is an image of Christ and the church. Verse 32: “I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church.” So marriage is like a metaphor or an image or a picture or a parable or a model that stands for something more than a man and a woman becoming one flesh. It stands for the relationship between Christ and the church. That’s the deepest meaning of marriage. It’s meant to be a living drama of how Christ and the church relate to each other. The Parallel Between One Body and One FleshYou can see how this is confirmed in verses 28-30. They describe the parallel between Christ and the church being one body andthe husband and wife being one flesh. Verses 28-29: “In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it . . . .” In other words, the one-flesh union between man and wife means that in a sense they are now one body so that the care a husband has for his wife he, in that very act, has for himself. They are one. What he does for her he does for himself. Then he compares this to Christ’s care for the church. Verses 29-30: “No one ever hated his own flesh, but nourishes and cherishes it, just as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body.” Be sure to see the parallel: Christ nourishes and cherishes the church because we are members (that is, arms and legs and hands and feet) of his body. And husbands nourish and cherish their wives “as their own bodies.” No one ever hated his own flesh. Wives are our own flesh as the church is Christ’s own body. Just as the husband is one flesh with his wife so Christ is one body with the church. When the husband cherishes and nourishes his wife, he cherishes and nourishes himself; and when Christ cherishes and nourishes the church, he cherishes and nourishes himself. All of this underlines what Paul calls a “profound mystery”—that marriage, in its deepest meaning, is a copy of Christ and the church. If you want to understand God’s meaning for marriage you have to grasp that we are dealing with a copy of a greater original, a metaphor of a greater reality and parable and a greater truth. And the original, the reality, the truth is God’s marriage to his people, or now in the New Testament, we see it as Christ’s marriage to the church. And the copy, the metaphor, the parable is human marriage between a husband and a wife. Geoffrey Bromiley says, “As God made man in His own image, so He made earthly marriage in the image of His own eternal marriage with His people” (God and Marriage, pg 43). I think that is exactly right. And it is one of the most profound things you can say about human life. The Roles Are DistinctOne of the things to learn from this mystery is that the roles of husband and wife in marriage are distinct. Consider the way Ephesians 5:22–25 unpacks the role of husband and the role of wife in the mystery of marriage as a copy of Christ and the church: “Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord. For the husband is the head of the wife even as Christ is the head of the church, his body, and is himself its Savior. Now as the church submits to Christ, so also wives should submit in everything to their husbands. Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her.” Husbands are compared to Christ; wives are compared to the church. Husbands are compared to the head; wives are compared to the body. Husbands are commanded to love as Christ loved; wives are commanded to submit as the church is to submit to Christ. It is astonishing how many people do not see this when they deal with this passage. Or, seeing it, neglect it. I have in mind those who would be called egalitarians—the ones who reject the idea that men are called to be leaders in the home. They put all the emphasis on verse 21 and the teaching of mutual submission. All agree that verse 21 is overflow from verse 18 where Paul commands us to be filled with the Spirit. Verses 18b-21: “Be filled with the Spirit, addressing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing and making melody to the Lord with your heart, giving thanks always and for everything to God the Father in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, submitting to one another out of reverence for Christ.” So submitting to one another is seen as an expression of being filled with the Holy Spirit. Husbands and wives who are filled with the Holy Spirit serve one another. They humble themselves and get down low to lift the other up. They find ways to submit their immediate preferences for comfort to the need of the other. Amen to that! May it happen more and more. I have no desire to minimize the mutuality of submission and servanthood. Mutual Submission and Unique RolesBut the problem is that egalitarians seem to stop with mutual submission, as if that were all one needed to say about roles in marriage, or as if that is all that the text has to say. And when they stop there, most people today are left with great ambiguity and great confusion about the proper roles of husband and wife. Once you clarify for people that a husband and a wife should be mutually humble, and mutually ready to serve each other, and mutually eager to meet each other’s needs and build each other up—once you have said all that, there remains a great uncertainty as to what, if anything, distinguishes the role of husband and wife. Is it only the biological gift of childbearing that distinguishes the roles? Or is there something more pervasive? What is so astonishing is that egalitarians don’t embrace what every ordinary reader can see in Ephesians 5. After declaring that there is mutual submission in verse 21, Paul devotes twelve verses to unfolding the difference in the way a husband and wife should serve each other. You don’t need to deny mutual submission to affirm the importance of the unique role of the husband as head and the unique calling of the wife to submit to that headship. Jesus, the Bridegroom, Served His BrideThe simplest way to see this is to remember that Jesus himself bound himself with a towel and got down on the floor and washed this disciples’ feet (the bridegroom, serving the bride), but not for one minute did any of the apostles in that room doubt who the leader was in that moment. In other words, mutuality of submission and servanthood do not cancel out the reality of leadership or headship. Servanthood does not nullify leadership; it defines it. Jesus does not cease to be the Lion of Judah when he becomes the lamb-like servant of the church. After calling attention to the mutuality of submission or servanthood in verse 21, Paul devotes the whole passage through verse 33 to making distinctions between the role of the husband and the role of the wife—between the loving headship of a husband who takes his cues from Christ, and the willing submission of a wife who takes her cues from how the church is to follow Christ. What we need to hear from this text today is not just a call to mutual submission that leaves young men groping for what it means to be a husband and young women groping for what it means to be a wife. What we need to hear is what headship and submission mean. What are the positive, practical implications of being called head that give man his distinct role in marriage? It is not enough to say, “Serve one another.” That is true of Christ and his church—they serve each other. But they do not serve each other in all the same ways. Christ is Christ. We are the church. To confuse the distinctions would be doctrinally and spiritually devastating. So also the man is the Christ-portraying husband, and the woman is the church-portraying wife. And to confuse these God-intended distinctions, or to abandon them, results in more disillusionment and more divorce and more devastation. The Roles Are Not Arbitrary or ReversibleOne of the things that are crystal clear in Ephesians 5 is that the roles of husband and wife in marriage are not arbitrarily assigned and they are not reversible any more than the role of Christ and the church are reversible. The roles of husband and wife are rooted in the distinctive roles of Christ and his church. The revelation of this mystery is the recovery of the original intention of covenant marriage in the Garden of Eden. You can see this most clearly when you ponder what sin did to headship and submission and how Paul’s teaching here in Ephesians 5 is so perfectly suited to remedy that corruption. When sin entered the world, it ruined the harmony of marriage not because it brought headship and submission into existence, but because it twisted man’s humble, loving headship into hostile domination in some men and lazy indifference in others. And it twisted woman’s intelligent, willing, happy, creative, articulate submission into manipulative obsequiousness or groveling in some women and brazen insubordination in others. Sin didn’t create headship and submission; it ruined them and distorted them and made them ugly and destructive. Recovering Roles from the Ravages of SinNow if this is true, then the redemption we anticipate with the coming of Christ is not the dismantling of the original, created order of loving headship and willing submission, but a recovery of it from the ravages of sin. And that’s exactly what we find here in Ephesians 5:21-33. Wives, let your fallen submission be redeemed by modeling it after God’s intention for the church! Husbands, let your fallen headship be redeemed by modeling it after God’s intention for Christ! Therefore, headship is not a right to control or to abuse or to neglect. (Christ’s sacrifice is the pattern.) Rather, it’s the responsibility to love like Christ in leading and protecting and providing for your wife and family. And submission is not slavish or coerced or cowering. That’s not the way Christ wants the church to respond to his leadership and protection and provision. He wants the submission of the church to be free and willing and glad and refining and strengthening. In other words, what Ephesians 5:21-33 does is two things: It guards against the abuses of headship by telling husbands to love like Jesus, and it guards against the debasing of submission by telling wives to respond the way the church does to Christ. Defining Headship and SubmissionSo let me close for now with brief definitions of headship and submission and then come back next week, Lord willing, with practical application of what this headship in particular looks like. - Headship is the divine calling of a husband to take primary responsibility for Christ-like, servant leadership, protection, and provision in the home. (See next week’s message for the biblical basis of the words “leadership, protection, and provision.”)
- Submission is the divine calling of a wife to honor and affirm her husband’s leadership and help carry it through according to her gifts.
A good deal is at stake here. I hope you take it seriously whether you are single or married, old or young. Not just the fabric of society hangs on this, but the revelation of the covenant-keeping Christ and his covenant-keeping church. | | |
| I found this article very interesting and so profound... Ministry Can Be Dangerous To Your Spiritual Health By Tim Keller We want Christians to be active in ministry, not just 'consumers of spiritual services.' We want Christians to become volunteers, and lay leaders, and church officers, and staff members of churches and ministry organizations. There is nothing so fulfilling as to see lives touched and changed through your service. But the Bible sounds a cautionary note. Christian leadership entails telling people every day, "God is so wonderful!" You will constantly point people toward God's worth and beauty, despite the fact that often your own heart is numb or dead to any sense of divine love and glory. What will you do in response to that? There are two things you can do. The first (and right thing) to do is to watch your heart far more closely than you would have otherwise, being very disciplined to observe regular times of daily prayer. In these times you may find your heart warming a great deal to God's reality. Prayer then fans the flame of that reality constantly, so you can speak to others out of what God is giving you in your walk with him. It is also possible that your heart may stay feeling spiritually dry or even dead. In that case you keep your stated times of prayer even more diligently. And you humbly acknowledge to God your dryness and set your heart to trust him and seek him despite it and during it. That deliberate act is itself a great step of spiritual growth and maturity. When you talk to God himself about your dryness (rather than just avoiding prayer times) it reminds you of your weakness, your dependence on his grace for absolutely everything. It drives home the importance and preciousness of your legal standing in Christ. The second (and wrong thing) to do is to rely not on prayer and your personal walk with God, but on the excitement of ministry activity and effectiveness. In other words, you can rely more on your spiritual gifts (of ministry) than on spiritual grace. In fact, you will probably mistake the operations of your spiritual gifts for the operation of spiritual grace in your life. 'Gifts' are abilities God gives us to meet the needs of others in Christ's name--speaking, encouraging, serving, evangelizing, teaching, leading, administering, counseling, discipling, organizing. 'Graces' (often called spiritual fruit) are beauties of character--love, joy, peace, humility, gentleness, self-control. Spiritual gifts are what we do; spiritual fruit or grace is what we are. Unless you understand the superior importance of grace and gospel-character for ministry effectiveness, the discernment and use of your spiritual gifts may be very dangerous. The terrible danger is that we can look to our ministry activity as evidence that God is with us, or as a way to earn God's favor and prove ourselves. If our heart remembers the gospel, and is rejoicing in our justification and adoption, then our ministry is done as a sacrifice of thanksgiving--and the result will be that our ministry is done in love, humility, patience, and tenderness. But our heart may be continuing to do the same self-justification it has always done--seeking to control God and others by earning and proving our worth--through our ministry performance. When this is the case, there will be the tell-tale signs of impatience, irritability, pride, hurt feelings, jealousy, boasting. We will identify with our ministry and make it an extension of ourselves. We will be driven, scared, and either too timid or too brash--until we see what we are doing. And perhaps, away from the public glare, there may be secret sins. It all shows that the ministry performance is exhausting and a cover for either of the two forms of pride: self-aggrandizement or self-hatred. Here's how this danger can begin. Your prayer life may be non-existent; you may have an unforgiving spirit toward someone; sexual desires may be out of control. But you get involved in some ministry activity and the situation draws out your spiritual gifts. You serve and help and people tell you how great you did. You see yourself touching lives. And then you conclude, "God is with me." But actually, God was helping someone through your gifts, even though your heart is far from him. Eventually if you don't do something about your lack of spiritual fruit and gracem and instead build your identity as a Christian on all your ministry activity, there will be some kind of collapse. You will blow up at someone or lapse into something that destroys your credibility. And everyone (including you) will be surprised, but no one should be. Spiritual gifts without spiritual fruit is like a tire losing air. So examine yourself. Despite being effective in ministry--is our prayer life dead? Do we struggle with feelings slighted? Are our feelings always being hurt? Is there a lot of anxiety and joylessness in our work? Do we find ourselves being highly critical of other churches or ministers or co-workers? Is there a lot of self-pity? If these things are true, then our ministry may be skillful and successful, but it is hollow, and probably we are either a) headed for a breakdown, of b) doomed to produce crowds and funds but superficial long-term effects. Kuyper somewhere said that Phariseeism is like a shadow--it can be deepest and sharpest closest to the light. The ministry polarizes people. It makes them far better or far worse Christians than they would have been otherwise, but it will not leave you where you were! There are enormous pressures in the ministry on your integrity and character. Tim Keller just puts a whole new perspective on ministry and serving. Moreover, from reading through this article, I really dug deep into my heart and saw all things that God was doing not just with my life, but in so many others in church and just ministry in general. And he makes a very valid and true point about making a discipline out of prayer and using prayer to reveal God's grace inside of our hearts, our character, and where we are in our walk with God. All the more reason to pray more and more every day... | | |
| For those who need comfort and mad encouragement... Psalm 77 1 I cried out to God for help; I cried out to God to hear me. 2 When I was in distress, I sought the Lord; at night I stretched out untiring hands and my soul refused to be comforted. 3 I remembered you, O God, and I groaned; I mused, and my spirit grew faint. Selah 4 You kept my eyes from closing; I was too troubled to speak. 5 I thought about the former days, the years of long ago; 6 I remembered my songs in the night. My heart mused and my spirit inquired: 7 "Will the Lord reject forever? Will he never show his favor again? 8 Has his unfailing love vanished forever? Has his promise failed for all time? 9 Has God forgotten to be merciful? Has he in anger withheld his compassion?" Selah 10 Then I thought, "To this I will appeal: the years of the right hand of the Most High." 11 I will remember the deeds of the LORD; yes, I will remember your miracles of long ago. 12 I will meditate on all your works and consider all your mighty deeds. 13 Your ways, O God, are holy. What god is so great as our God? 14 You are the God who performs miracles; you display your power among the peoples. 15 With your mighty arm you redeemed your people, the descendants of Jacob and Joseph. Selah 16 The waters saw you, O God, the waters saw you and writhed; the very depths were convulsed. 17 The clouds poured down water, the skies resounded with thunder; your arrows flashed back and forth. 18 Your thunder was heard in the whirlwind, your lightning lit up the world; the earth trembled and quaked. 19 Your path led through the sea, your way through the mighty waters, though your footprints were not seen. 20 You led your people like a flock by the hand of Moses and Aaron. Oh, how we are so weak and yet you give us strength to go on... | | |
| Psalm 57 1 Have mercy on me, O God, have mercy on me, for in you my soul takes refuge. I will take refuge in the shadow of your wings until the disaster has passed. 2 I cry out to God Most High, to God, who fulfills {his purpose} for me. 3 He sends from heaven and saves me, rebuking those who hotly pursue me; Selah God sends his love and his faithfulness. 4 I am in the midst of lions; I lie among ravenous beasts— men whose teeth are spears and arrows, whose tongues are sharp swords. 5 Be exalted, O God, above the heavens; let your glory be over all the earth. 6 They spread a net for my feet— I was bowed down in distress. They dug a pit in my path— but they have fallen into it themselves. Selah 7 My heart is steadfast, O God, my heart is steadfast; I will sing and make music. 8 Awake, my soul! Awake, harp and lyre! I will awaken the dawn. 9 I will praise you, O Lord, among the nations; I will sing of you among the peoples. 10 For great is your love, reaching to the heavens; your faithfulness reaches to the skies. 11 Be exalted, O God, above the heavens; let your glory be over all the earth. So I haven't written in this thing for a long while. In a nutshell, this passage is just one of many psalms that I've been reflecting on these past couple of weeks, talking about how sinful I've been and how hurtful I've been to God and the people who are close to me. To those who I hurt in the past and present, I'm sorry. But most of all, I'm sorry God for being an unfaithful son and for lacking so much and for hurting you so much. I only hope that I can change myself and become more Christ-like little by little every day, like that song "Little by Little". Hope everyone has a wonderful and blessed week... | | |
|