Weblog

Monday, May 12, 2008

  • Summer Movie Preview

    Kung Fu Panda - June 6

    Po the Panda is the laziest animals in all of the Valley of Peace, but unwittingly becomes the chosen one when enemies threaten their way of life.

    __________________________________________________________________________

    Get Smart - June 20

    Maxwell Smart, Agent 86 for CONTROL, battles the forces of KAOS with the more-competent Agent 99 at his side.

    __________________________________________________________________________

    Wall-E - June 27

    The year is 2700. WALL*E, a robot, spends every day doing what he was made for. But soon, he will discover what he was meant for.

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    Wanted - June 27

    Wanted tells the tale of one apathetic nobody's transformation into an unparalleled enforcer of justice.

    ______________________________________________________________________---

    Hancock - July 2

    A hard-living superhero who has fallen out of favor with the public enters into a questionable relationship with the wife of the public relations professional who's trying to repair his image.

    _________________________________________________________________________

    Hellboy II: The Golden Army - July 11

    The mythical world starts a rebellion against humanity in order to rule the Earth, so Hellboy and his team must save the world from the rebellious creatures.

    __________________________________________________________________________

    Journey the the Center of the Earth - 3D - July 11

    On a quest to find out what happened to his missing brother, a scientist, his nephew and their mountain guide discover a fantastic and dangerous lost world in the center of the earth.

    _______________________________________________________________________

    Meet Dave - July 11

    A crew of miniature aliens operate a spaceship that has a human form. While trying to save their planet, the aliens encounter a new problem, as their ship becomes smitten with an Earth woman.

    ____________________________________________________________________________

    The Dark Knight - July 18

    Batman and James Gordon join forces with Gotham's new District Attorney, Harvey Dent, to take on a psychotic bank robber known as The Joker, whilst other forces plot against them, and Joker's crimes grow more and more deadly.

    ________________________________________________________________________

    Mamma Mia! - July 18

    The story of a bride-to-be trying to find her real father told using hit songs by the popular '70s group ABBA.

    _______________________________________________________________________________

    Space Chimps - July 18

    Ham III, the grandson of the first chimp astronaut, is blasted off into space by an opportunity-seeking senator. Soon, the fun-loving chimp has to get serious about the mission at hand: Rid a far-away planet of their nefarious leader.

    __________________________________________________________________________

    The Mummy III: Tomb of the Dragon Emperor - August 1

    In the Far East, trouble-seeking father-and-son duo Rick and Alex O'Connell unearth the mummy of the first Emperor of Qin -- a shape-shifting entity who was cursed by a wizard centuries ago.

    _____________________________________________________________________ 

    Star Wars: The Clone Wars - August 15

    __________________________________________________________________________

    Babylon A.D. - August 29

    Veteran-turned-mercenary Thoorop takes the high-risk job of escorting a woman from Russia to China. Little does he know that she is host to an organism that a cult wants to harvest in order to produce a genetically modified Messiah.

    __________________________________________________________________

    Traitor - August 29

    A special operative working with a terrorist group becomes the target of the CIA.

     

  • Iron Man

     

    Iron Man is the strongest superhero I have seen to date – Marvel Studios have made an extraordinary start to their unencumbered movie production roster, with tales of billionaire crusader Tony Stark set to be a formidable franchise and an iron-clad money-maker. No offense to Spidey, the other Marvel Comics hero who's already provided billion-dollar summer blockbuster fodder. But there's just something more relatable about Tony Stark, even though he's a playboy industrialist of staggering wealth and arrogance.

    Tony Stark gets kidnapped by nasty extremists whilst demonstrating some of his gee-whiz weaponry in Afghanistan, makes his escape in a pre-alpha, highly weaponised exo-skeleton that he cobbles together behind his captors’ backs and returns home a chastened man, determined to build suit 2.0 and protect the innocent from all that nasty Stark Industries tech that has gotten into the wrong hands. So far, we are following the the comics to perfection.

    This brings him into immediate opposition to second-in-command Obadiah Stane (Jeff Bridges, whom I barely recognized), who locks Stark out of control of his own company and casts a more than envious eye over his boss’s flying war-suit, determining to build one of his own and clear all obstructions out of his path.

    After a low-key entry, the action ramps up quickly as we backtrack over the 36 hours leading to Stark’s kidnapping, a predictable but amusing gallery of rich-boy excesses - Stark eschews an industry award to play roulette, pulls a glamorous reporter from Vanity Fair (who presumably have paid well for the privilege in the real world) and buys a horrendously expensive work of art that he knows nothing about simply because he’s told it’s ‘overpriced’.

    Once captive in the Afghanistan caves, Stark gets his first taste of the real world, as he awakens hooked up to a car battery – cellmate and surgeon Yinsen (brit Shaun Toub) has saved the tycoon’s life by drawing away fatal shrapnel with magnets. And handily given Iron Man the Achilles heel every superhero needs.

    Yinsen helps Stark construct his prototype exo-skeleton right under their captives’ noses, and if you wondered how they sneaked a project like that past constant CCTV surveillance in the trailers, you’ll be no more enlightened by the film – these are very dozy militant extremists indeed.

    The escape of the Heath-Robinson, jury-rigged Iron Man is one of the few pieces of eye-popping action not entirely revealed to us in advance publicity, and the flame-throwing, score-settling sequence is a notable cheer-point.

    Repatriated, Stark resumes his awkward flirting with reliable but long-suffering assistant Potts and sets about making a new and better suit. It’s been reported that the suit is developed in 5 hours, but the often-hilarious R&D session in fact takes several weeks within the time-line of the movie. The first test-flight over Malibu is a stunning sequence, capturing the raw exhilaration of the flight-fantasy in a way that Bryan Singer failed to do in Superman Returns.

    Thereafter the movie begins to lose its sure pace, but picks it up again by the end.

    Robert Downey Jr. was born to play Tony Stark – a combination of suavity and selfishness, energy and ungoverned sloth. It’s clear that Downey has brought everything to the part. It’s a neurotic/cocky persona that he has played a number of times (notably in 2005’s Kiss Kiss Bang Bang), and here its bohemian excesses are pleasingly tempered by a big streak of humanity and repentance – such as we have seen Downey live through a number of times in his life.

    The same can’t be said of Jeff Bridges, who frankly fails to convince as the upwardly-mobile and backstabbing Obadiah Stane. His acting is fine, but the aggressive instinct requisite for playing screen villains doesn’t seem to be in the actor's nature. I love Jeff Bridges, but this wasn’t one for him.

    Paltrow is excellent, as are the remainder of the supporting cast, and the ILM special effects are naturally flawless, albeit to slightly sickening effect in one scene where Paltrow has to reach into Downey Jr.’ s impossibly deep chest cavity to help him out with the internal wiring that keeps him alive (a man as rich as Stark could probably afford to have that Kryptonite-like shrapnel safely taken out with a little conventional surgery, but let’s not bicker on the point).

    Stan Lee’s customary appearance is as jarring as ever, though I won’t spoil it for you. We owe Mr Lee a lot for the Marvel universe, but Hitchcock did a much better job of autographing his projects.

    Something has to be said of the films soundtrack. I happen to actually know most of the grunge guitar ballads thanks to Guitar Hero. Honestly, it was outrageously jarring sometimes, but for the most part they managed to pull it off.

    These are minor quibbles - I don't know if Iron Man could beat Superman in a battle, but his debut beats any number of superhero origin stories - or for that matter, sequels - of recent years. Batman had better watch his back. 8/10

    Reccomendation: It's a blockbuster with a brain. PS Sit through all of the credits for a sneak peak at the beginning of what will surely be a great new series.

Friday, May 02, 2008

  • I'm a Cynic

    After being a Christian for almost 22 years I have found that I have entered the realm of cynicism. In an ancient greek, School of Cynicism kind of way.

    Cynicism is one of the most striking of all the Hellenistic philosophies. It offered people the possibility of happiness and freedom from suffering in an age of uncertainty. Although there was never an official Cynic doctrine, the fundamental principles of Cynicism can be summarized as follows:

    1. The goal of life is happiness which is to live in agreement with Nature.
    2. Happiness depends on being self-sufficient, and a master of mental attitude.
    3. Self-sufficiency is achieved by living a life of Virtue.
    4. The road to Virtue is to free oneself from any influence such as wealth, fame, or power, which have no value in Nature.
    5. Suffering is caused by false judgments of value, which cause negative emotions and a vicious character.

    The ideal Cynic would evangelize; as the watchdog of humanity, it was their job to hound people about the error of their ways. The example of the Cynic's life (and the use of the Cynic's biting satire) would dig-up and expose the pretensions which lay at the root of everyday conventions.

    By following this kind of philosophy within my own faith, I find myself questioning many things that the modern church is doing. I am constantly speaking about it and interjecting it into conversations. This seems to make people very uncomfortable. I don't want people to misunderstand me and think that I am searching for mistakes or ills, or that my goal in life is to point out the error of other's ways. But I am not doing anything that Jesus didn't do, meaning pointing out the social ills brought about by the Pharisees and the temple of his day.

    For example: One of my biggest issues would be the way that churches "go into all the world and preach the gospel".

    As I see it, here’s how “make disciples of all nations” tends to play out in the modern Church:

    1. Get as many people as we can to show up regularly at Sunday morning worship through advertising, commercials, and word of mouth. No need to leave the safety of the church. 
    2. Once they’re in the doors, get them to be “born again”.
    3. Once they’re born again, get them to conform to the sub-cultural model of what “Christian” is.
    4. Once they’ve conformed to the model (e.g. they listen to all the “right” music, read all the “right” books, drink all the “right” drinks, can speak using the “right” lingo, and appear to be “into” worship on Sunday morning), we can then say they’ve been made into disciples.
    5. Once they’re disciples, they’ve been completely self-actualized and can engage in the work of “making disciples” and the whole grand order starts all over again.

    I know this is a shocker, but I’m not entirely comfortable with this mechanism for a number of reasons.

    The first reason is that it leads into the notion that if a church is “big” it’s somehow doing a better job at making disciples. I would argue that this is crap. Big churches make clones, not disciples. Dander up yet? Here’s what I mean: By virtue of their size, big churches can’t really know their constituency. Sorry, it’s true. Say what you like about small groups, but I’ve yet to experience a big church small group that was doing anything but trying to make me into a “better” big churchgoer.

    But, you know better don’t you? YOUR small group is different. I can hear you constructing your apologies to my argument already. But, before you dot your “i”’s and cross your “t”’s, think about these questions. Does your small group meet regularly? How regularly? Is it regularly enough that you REALLY get to know your fellow small groupers…like, say, 1 or 2 times a week? What do you study in small group? Do you use a devotional, a guide? What does that guide seek to shape you into? Are there predetermined answers to that devotional that you really should be able to get? Is your group even meeting to study the word of God or is it based on an activity that you all enjoy doing? If it is an activity, can that actually be considered a small group or is it more of a bunch of friends getting together to bike, hike, talk, or do crafts? If the people in your small group quit coming to small groups would they be missed? Would you hang out with them even though they no longer see you once a week or less?

    Another reason I’m not comfortable with the big church mechanism is that “making disciples” is seen as a linear process with a predetermined endpoint. I’m not sure that this critique can be so roundly asserted at only big churches, though. Small churches seem pretty good at this one too. If the making of a disciple is a linear process with a specific end goal (i.e. a picture of the perfect disciple), then it seems plausible that we should emulate that character. The linear model has a fatal flaw, however. It assumes that a “perfect disciple” is a static construct–in fact, most Christians hold this “end target person” to be Jesus. The thing is, Jesus doesn’t tell us to become Jesus. (at least I can't find it anywhere in the Bible) Jesus doesn’t tell us to become divine. Jesus tells us to be disciples, followers, dynamic creatures whose hearts’ desire is the kingdom of God.

    Jesus tells us to be people of direction, people of pursuit.

    This is a pretty uncomfortable thing for the church entrenched, sub-culture worshiping, Christian music listening, drug-free, rich, Christian. Here’s why: Being a disciple doesn’t require you to find a place of peace, it requires you to find a place of war and be peaceful. Being a disciple doesn't mean you will be financially stable, it requires you to be giving in order to see the works of heaven fulfilled on earth. It requires you to find a place of of hurt and be comforting. It requires you to find a place of darkness and be light. Disciples aren’t necessarily the ones who’ve “achieved holiness”; disciples are the ones who PURSUE holiness. A disciple is a traveler. A disciple seeks answers rather than bears answers.

    Disciples are people who are hurt and broken and imperfect and seek God within that.

    That’s uncomfortable. I don't know if I even have it all figured out in my head yet. Frankly, I’d love nothing more than to sit around in an upper-middle class haven and just, you know, be holy and crap. But, it doesn’t work that way. I’m not sure they’re telling us that in big churches. And now that I think about it, I’m not so convinced I’m hearing it in little churches either. Now, I do use the terms modern church as a large mass and I know there are churches out there not teaching this and I know that it is possible to build relationships within a large church (harder but possible) but this is just one of the issues that concerns me. 

    So I am a cynic. I think it is important to think about things like this and point them out. I am naturally inclined to ask questions, it's the logical person within me, but I am also taught that a good Christian shouldn't questions things like this. That a cynic is a 'negative Nancy' who only delights in tearing people down. This is where my heart and all the things that I have been taught, collide. Should we not questions our churches, call pastors into accountability, call our brothers and sisters in Christ into accountability, search for better ways to do things, find ways to serve others in an unselfish way, call churches to serve the world?

    But I am not all negative. There are some amazing men and women and churches that are doing these things. Who do question these things too and act on them. I admire those people. They see the negative and turn it into a positive.

    So my hope is that by talking about this stuff and putting it out in the open, perhaps people will look closer at the things they are doing and make any neccesary changes. I know that questioning these things has definitely changed me for the better and has put into focus the things that really matter, like my family, giving, and missions. 

Wednesday, April 30, 2008

  • It's all Relative

    I love my immediate family, but my extended family - it's just a bunch of strangers. Most of our extended family lives in Fairmont and Mannington, West Virginia. Two little shit holes (sorry, but it's the only way to describe them) where there is nothing to do besides get drunk, raise cattle, or work in coal mines. These are my relatives. When my parents got married, my mom made my dad swear that he would get her out of WV. When I was four we moved to New Jersey. We visited our family once a year at Thanksgiving. The experience was anything but pleasant. Our relatives nitpicked, made fun of us, cousins were mean, grandparents were rude, no-one seemed the least bit interested in us and so the distance become more than just miles.

    Sure, as kids we managed to find fun despite everything but as I got older I began to resent having these people forced on me. As soon as I had a job, I quit visiting. My grandmother was horribly mean to us and particularly me, my cousins barely spoke a word to me, my aunts and uncles were not interested in anything I said, my grandpa was an alcoholic, and my great parents were just really old and grouchy, another grandmother had a couple of strokes and was in a wheelchair. The only really relationship I have with any extended relatives is my Great Grandpa Larson who rocks and lives in Philly. We have an aunt and uncle and 2 cousins that moved about 20 minutes away and we see them about twice a year. My first questions when they moved here is, "What do you do with cousins?" 

    Where am I going with all this? Well, my maternal grandfather is sick. Because of 60+ years of drinking he now has cerosis of the liver. He was brought down here to NC and more than likely won't live out the summer. It is hard to watch someone die, and even harder when they are strangers. But the hardest part is that I am supposed to care. I see how it affects my mother, who grew up in an abusive alcoholic home and she even seems to have mixed feelings about it. It seems that most of her concerns are related to where he will go when he dies though. I feel like everyone is looking at me and expecting me to rush to his side, and become great friends with him before he dies, and I have no idea why or how I should do that.

    I want this curse to end though. I want to have relationships with my brothers, sister-in-laws, future nieces and nephews, mom, dad, etc. I don't want my immediate family to become like our current extended family.

     

    My Grandpa. I know I look happy but that was one awkward hug.

Tuesday, April 29, 2008

  • The Forbidden Kingdom

    It isn't really a secret that when it comes to martial arts films, I know almost nothing. Sure, I know the big names and I have seen the more famous films, but they have never been my thing. The biggest reason is this new (or is it old?) thing where everyone is attached to wires and it is completely obvious. They might as well not even remove the wires because nobody is fooled.

    That said, I actually liked this movie. It's mystical and has beautiful scenery and it's nothing like Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon.

    It was very fascinating to see Jet Li and Jackie Chan in the same film because their fighting techniques are so different. Jet Li is always serious and Jackie Chan is always goofy. The fighting scene between the two men was probably the best 15 minutes of the film. It was really exhilarating to see two great actors and martial arts legends come together. The best part about the film is the fight seemed very real - no fake flying. The choreography for the fighting scene between Jet Li and Jackie Chan was beautiful. It was almost like a dance just with a lot of kicking. It was intense and it was hard to say who was going to win because they were both so good. They also used cool techniques that I recognized from playing too much Mortal Kombat.

    The film is about a geeky kid named Jason, played by Michael Angarano (Sky High, Lords of Dogtown), who gets picked on by a bully. I suspect his role was created purely to appeal to all the white kids out there and to the masses of course. Jason is a fanatic of kung fu. He watches kung fu movies, has a room filled with posters of Bruce Lee and he even dreams about kung fu. In the opening credits we roll around Jason's room, getting to see all the old kung fu movie posters. Jason often goes to a pawn shop where he buys his kung fu movies. Now this is in Boston's Chinatown, but it doesn't look like it. In fact it reminded me more of LA than Boston. But that is such a small part of the film so perhaps I shouldn't be so nitpicky. One day he discovers a staff in the back room of the pawn shop. It's the staff that he's been seeing in his dreams. The owner tells Jason the staff has been there for many years and that he is waiting for the rightful owner to pick it up.

    Jason is given the staff after getting into some trouble and is transported into a different era of China. This is where he meets Lu Yan (Jackie Chan) and The Silent Monk. (Jet Li)

    There is a myth in China that there was once a monkey king who no one could defeat as long as he had his staff. However, he was tricked by the Jade Warlord and his staff was lost. The prophecy said that it would be returned by a man who would help save the people of China from the warlord's torment. The man happened to be Jason, a white boy. It was funny when The Silent Monk first meets Jason and realizes he is the key to getting the staff back to the monkey king. The first thing he says is, "He's not even Chinese." Nice powers of observation.

    Michael Angarano was the perfect person for this role. He looked geeky, acted geeky but fought wonderfully. I can't imagine signing onto that film, knowing what he would have to learn and who he would be working with.

    Jet Li does a wonderful job and luckily didn't have to wear a wig. Jackie Chan looked ridiculous with long hair but he was as funny as ever. The film was remiscent of Warriors of Virtue meets The Karate Kid with a spattering of The Neverending Story. Some of the villains are over the top, the effects are formidable, and fight scenes frequently disobey the laws of physics, but it’s all part of the fun. 7/10

    Recommendation: A lot of fun but probably even more so for the martial arts enthusiast.



SWAurora

  • Visit SWAurora's Xanga Site
    • Name: Venus Musgrove
    • Birthday: 8/30/1981
    • Gender: Female
    • Member Since: 6/27/2004

About Me

  • I have two desires in this life: to pursue God with breathless passion...and to own a penguin named Herbert.

Pulse