| | The American Identity: Language Recently, jtngu8
made a really superb blog entry about Chinese and Vietnamese populations in her
native country of Australia. She asked the controversial question of why these
populations have not taken the time to learn English since it is the official
operating language of Australia. To this, a lot of responses have been posted
to either support or critique against the idea of English being mandatory for
immigrant populations. I have a strong viewpoint on the place of migrant
populations in western countries, but considering that I am not Australian or
fully understand the Australian dilemma, I feel as if my opinions are misplaced
and do not apply. Therefore instead I would like to take a look at the American
situation. Here in the US we have large populations of immigrants, Asians,
Europeans, South Americans, Africans, and of course Hispanics. Often these
populations choose to live, work, and play in small communities that resemble
their own unique culture. Here, they have goods and services geared toward the
inhabitants of these micro-communities and often, the language of these areas are
non-English. Many Americans feel as if these communities are separatist and “un-American”
in that they promote an alternate lifestyle and their choice to forgo the
dominant English language create barriers against other English-speaking
Americans. Often opponents of these communities think it is necessary for these
people to learn to speak English.
While I
sincerely understand the viewpoint of these opposing opinions, I respectfully
disagree with their assessment. I think a very core issue in this discussion is
the topic of identity. Firstly we must ask what really constitutes as an
American? I think a great number of people have a specific picture of what an
American is supposed to be. Possibly, they have a vivid picture of an American as
the Anglo-Saxon Protestant who votes, participates in the social sphere,
understand local customs, and is integrated into the social fabric of America.
Importantly, they speak English. For me, I think an American is a much less rigidly
defined identity. Just because the majority of the population fits the
prior-mentioned picture, does not mean the rest of the minority populations are
excluded.
If we want
to be completely technical, the majority of Anglo-Saxons would not be true
Americans. Rather, technically, true Americans are native Americans - the
original inhabitants of this land we inhabit. And no, the REAL Americans do not
speak English, they speak one of the hundreds of indigenous native American
languages. But I digress; no one these days will recognize this sort of extremist
definition. We have moved beyond this rigid kind of thinking. Even though
the prior-mentioned definition is the de
facto definition of what an American is, today’s “proper” definition does
not require ancestry as a necessity in the American identity. Today’s
definition of American is based on inhabitance. Those who inhabit this land are
Americans, specifically; those who are born
in this land or have lived here long enough and can/wish to fulfill naturalization
requirements are Americans.
This may seem
rather natural to us but it is in fact not the norm worldwide. Let’s take a
look at some foreign examples. In the world, the American practice of naturalization
by birth is in the minority. In most of the “Old World,” birth does not
necessarily grant you the title of a national. Rather, you must be borne of at
least one national or can claim a lineage of ancestry to be a citizen. Furthermore,
unlike the US, naturalization is not automatic. For example, it is completely
possible that you could be born in France, lived there all your life, speak
only French, but not be a Frenchman.
The
situation in other countries is even more complicated. While most countries
have some sort of methodology and criteria for the naturalization of foreigners
into political citizens, the social acceptance of these foreigners is even more
complicated. You could be born in France, lived there all your life, hold a French
passport and citizenship, but because you are black or middle eastern, you are not
socially accepted as French. This is because ethnicity and nationhood does not
always correlate with political citizenship and statehood. I should note that there
is a difference between a "nation" and a "state," the
former being referring to people and the later being a political determination
of place. A "nation" is a group of people with similar culture,
language, and social practices. A "state" is a political organization
headed by a government with defined borders and exercises political power. Often we
confused the two words and interchange them as if they were the same. For
example, we often refer to countries (such as America) as a nation but in
reality by definition it is not, it is a country, a state. Japan is actually one
of the FEW places in the world that is both a "nation” and a “state."
In Japan, 99% of the population is ETHNICALLY Japanese. This is primarily due
to the fact it is an island nation and its history of being socially and
politically closed off. Japanese citizens and nationals, therefore happen to
overlap serendipitously be the same thing.
Coincidentally,
there are also examples of the opposite happening as well. There are
some
"nations" without "states." The nation of Palestine for
example, has no state or political borders. The nation of Palestine
(the
Palestinian people) extends into Israel, Jordan, Egypt, etc. The
Palestinian people are therefore subject the laws and authorities of
different governments but are still unified with one common heritage,
language, culture, and social pattern. (Another example
of this phenomenon is the Kurds.)
The American
experience is very different. We are a country of immigrants. So much so, that
the immigrant populations (your Anglo-Saxons) have superseded over the de facto,
world nominal, definition of national identity. In essence, the immigrants of
America, have (because of our numerical majority) become more American than the actual Americans. However, America is far from a nation because we are all of
different ethnic backgrounds. We have Caucasians, Asians, Africans, every mix
of European, and Hispanics and we are all called and accepted as Americans both
politically as citizens and socially as nationals.
America
therefore is a mixture of people, cultures, languages, and lifestyles. There is
no unifying definition of what is an
American. We cannot be defined by ancestry, by color, by status, by sex, and
importantly - by language. This is reflected by the fact that America has no official language. This may surprise a lot of people, but Congress has tried to
push a measure to certify English as the official language many times in history but every time it has failed because our
leaders have recognized the diversity of our ethnic and vernacular differences. An
American has no cultural, ancestral, or vernacular definition. Americans are
untraditional in every sense of the word. We are world aberrations in many ways
and even in our identity. We are people from all different backgrounds that are
united only by the founding declarations
by which this country was founded: of “life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness.”
American
is not a “melting pot” of people and cultures, but rather a “salad bowl” or “patchwork
quilt” – we live, work, play, and speak differently but together we make the
whole blanket or bowl of a greater American identity. Our similarities lie in
our differences. In the New York Metro area I can within a day, visit Latino
neighborhoods, Irish areas, Chinatown, Korea-town, Indian communities, Italian
streets, and Japanese shopping centers and each area with a whole new language being
spoken and used NATRUALLY. Yet in these areas, you will find
Mexican flags drawn on windows of houses with American flags waving overhead.
You will find Asian fusion restraints. You will find Irish kids speaking
Spanish to their Hispanic friends. You will hear Hip Hop mixed with Indian beats.
You will find Muslim mosques built on the same block as a Catholic cathedral.
And you will find families with different shades of skin colors, hair colors, and
shapes of eyes. This is the essence of freedom. Of liberty. Of choice to life-style.
Of pursuit of happiness.
All of
these communities are American communities. Some of them are citizens, some are
transitioning to be citizens, and some are not citizens but have children who
are citizens. But as an immigrant you must start somewhere. The important part is that all of these people love the
country that they live in and are thankful for the opportunity for a new life
that they were given when they came here. These people may not speak English but
they work, participate in American society, participate in the election process,
pay their taxes and contribute to the economy. While not everyone may speak
English, their children will no doutably be fluent English speakers. Statistics
show that nearly 95% of the offspring of first generation immigrants are
fluent in English. I am not so extreme as to ask everyone pick up another
language, (or 2, or 3, or 4, or 5). I will not argue the fact that English is the
dominant language. Almost all immigrants attempt to learn English, however
anyone who is an adult and whose individual identity is already established
will have difficulty in learning a second language and assimilating into a new life. Therefore, they may choose to
live in ethnic enclaves where they are comfortable with their culture,
surroundings, services, people, and language. It may take a second generation
of their offspring to venture out of these enclaves and become “nominal”
Americans.
On the question of loyalty, currently, minorities make up 30% of the country’s armed forces when
they only represent 19% of the total
national population, meaning that minorities
disproportionally elect to serve more in this country's
defence with their lives than their Caucasian counterparts. I
personally,
like most other Americans males my age, am enrolled in the Selective
Service –
America’s emergency draft system. I will defend this country with the
last
fiber of my being if my country decides it is necessary to call upon me
to do
so. And no, I was not born here, I was born in Beijing, China. I became
a naturalized American citizen over 6 years ago but I have lived here for over 18
years of my life.
This is my
new adorable baby niece, she was born not too long ago in London, England: These are her parents:
 Her name is Addison Shiloh MeiLing Goldstein. Shiloh is Hebrew. MeiLing is Chinese. Even though Addie's tiny feet have never set forth on American soil, she has full fledged American citizenship. Even though she was born in London, the United Kingdom's laws say she cannot be considered an English girl because her parents are are Americans.
Addison is the face and future of an American.
|
i really truly feel this post, even though i'm not American. this issue with identity have always plaqued me. English is Singapore's FIRST language, followed by our native tongue. and that's where my problem comes in. i have no clue what's my native tongue. i have been looked down on countless of times for this. with such diversified culture in my country, such issues still exist and it surprises me tremendously.
anyhoo, well written, once again. u deserve my star and recommendation.