Hole in the wallBoy I got vision and the rest of the world wears bifocals
About this Entry
Posted by: adamtheduke

Visit adamtheduke's Xanga Site

Original: 1/29/2008 12:41 PM
Comments: 14
eProps: 6

Read Comments
Post a Comment
Back to Your Xanga Site


Who gave the eProps?
2 eProps!2 eProps! 2 eProps from:
Borg_103
sojourner84
DanDaMano


Tuesday, January 29, 2008
 

Where have all of the socialists gone? Back in the era of McCarthyism you could always count on a few socialists lurking around here and there, fighting for the oppressed middle class. Anymore, you're hard pressed to find any inside these here United States, aside from at a Rage Against the Machine concert and the occasional Canadian visitor. Why is socialism so taboo here in the good old US of A? We've been socialists for years! Socialism crept into the United States with the help of everyone's favorite President FDR in 1935 when he signed the Social Security Act on August 14th. Welfare and Social Security are two programs that came about as a result of the Social Security Act. These programs involve the redistribution of monies from one group (taxpayers) to another group (the impovrished, the retired the unemployed). This is socialism. Socialists believe in the collective control of assets by the community (understand that these are general terms). In the case of the United States, a portion of assets is forcefully taken from the wage earner (itemized on their paycheck as "FICA" which stands for Federal Insurance Contributions Act tax and SECA for the Self Employed), this money then whirls around in the giant Federal Machine randomly finding it's way into various pockets along the way and eventually it is spit back out into welfare offices or maybe even your grandparents' mail box. Upon exiting the giant Federal Machine the initial sum of the forcibly taken money is diminished, some of it gobbled up for who knows what by who knows who. I know that you're thinking, "But this money is going to my grandparents, and they really need it," and I won't disagree, Social Security money goes to some very deserving people, people who are past their working years, or who are otherwise unable to work or perhaps the primary wage earner in their family has died, or maybe they just need a little cash between jobs, all worthy causes no doubt. I for one have benefited from Social Security far more than the average American, and through no small amount of coercion, I continue to pay into the system as crooked and inefficient as I think it is.

So what is my point? First of all, Socialism is alive and well in the United States. Socialism weathered McCarthyism with little trouble, and has continued to thrive and grow since. Socialism's most recent campaign is that of Socialized medicine. Medicare provides health insurance to those who are over 65 or disabled, Medicaid provides health services to those who are impovrished. There are those who would like to provide health insurance to all children in the United States. If you can't see the slippery slope you're blind. If the government provides health care for us when we're old and when we can't work and now when we're young, why not just have the government provide health insurance for everyone all the time, cradle to grave. Canada does it. And so does all of Europe. They also pay from 5 to 30% more of their income to the government than we do here. In some European countries this can be as high as 55%. To put that into perspective for you, if you made $36,000 in Belgium, the government would take $19,800 and you would be left with the rest. But your health care would be covered. Point 2 being; Socialized medicine = High taxes.

On to Point 3. Because socialism is alive and well in the United States, there should be a socialist party. I know, I know that would make us more like France and nobody wants that (except Canadians that don't like the cold), but the Socialist party could be the haven for all of those in current political parties who are pushing these socialist ideas of saving Social Security and Socializing Medicine. We have a democratic party but we're not a democracy. Why not have a Socialist party to un-muddy the water some?

Point 4: The United States of America aka The Republic of the United States of America is not a Democracy. Democracies elect federal government officials by popular vote. If we did that John Kerry would have been President. We are a Republic (which makes us similar to France), we elect representatives. Once again, USA: not a democracy. Republic - it's in the name people. My number one election year pet peeve.

Point V: Also mentioned with Point III, Social Security (the retirement kind) is not something to rely on. While it works great for my Grandparents and their generation, I (we) won't see a dime of it. It should be phased out as soon as possible so that those who want to retire in the future (me) can take that money and do something else with it like put it in a 401k or IRA, anything as long as the government is "hands off." It's not called "Social Insecurity" for nothing.

Currently Listening
Evil Empire
By Rage Against the Machine
Bulls on Parade
see related
 Posted 1/29/2008 12:41 PM - 14 comments

Give eProps or Post a Comment

14 Comments

Visit Borg_103's Xanga Site!
Well said. Of course, with the coming fall of the dollar, even money investment is a bad idea. It's great for the long run, but that assumes the investment doesn't go insolvent. Traditionally, in times such as these we look to investment in specie and real estate. However, both of those are inflated at the moment. We've dug a pretty deep hole with both socialism and trying to live above our means through loans.
Posted 1/29/2008 1:21 PM by Borg_103 - reply

Visit sojourner84's Xanga Site!
Don't forget credit.  I was watching a documentary about India and the most memorable quote was of a woman from the lower class.  "The most absurd idea in the system of economics is credit."  We need to prepare our younger generations for the hard years ahead.
Posted 1/29/2008 1:51 PM by sojourner84 - reply

Visit Borg_103's Xanga Site!
I agree with you on almost all accounts. I just think the dollar is facing hard times in the future. Our system is being kept alive on credit. The only way to fix our problem is for people to start paying off their credit, but when the Fed continually lowers rates that tells people to get more loans, not pay them off. Now, that's a pretty stupid reaction to lowered rates, but people aren't especially intelligent everywhere you look. Perhaps "fall of the dollar" is strong, but I do think we are looking at a period of increased inflation in the near future. Sure, inflation in total is not that bad right now, but when you break down the numbers, the things that have a high rate of inflation are things like real estate, oil products, food. Things like computers, clothing, etc. are going down in price, but those things are not essentials. You are absolutely right: we need to bite the bullet. The problem is, what politician is going to say, "no more free money--you guys gotta pay your bills now"?
Posted 1/29/2008 6:17 PM by Borg_103 - reply

Visit Borg_103's Xanga Site!
Haha, I didn't even realize you just posted. I just got home and turned on my computer to start studying. And I agree with the thing about long term investment. I have a few accounts that have been left for me by my grandfather, my grandmother, and my parents' divorce agreement. They will continue to make money for a long time. I realize that, effectively, with high inflation, a 5% guaranteed return could effectively be -50%, but I also realize that inflation will stabilize and drop eventually as it has in the past. My dad has a lot of real estate that he bought back in the mid-90s that can help him be safe if things get bad. I will have a JD in about 2 years (maybe 1.5 depending) and will therefore always be able to make money. Of course, the Air Force will keep me alive if needed. Either way, my accounts are diversified in stable, low interest (relatively) accounts and at least one mutual fund with funds and minimum returns guaranteed. I know full well that I've been given far more than I deserve, but it won't bother me one bit if it gives me the ability to better provide for my eventual family.
Posted 1/29/2008 6:31 PM by Borg_103 - reply

Visit sojourner84's Xanga Site!
Well said, Adam!  Well said!
Posted 1/29/2008 8:15 PM by sojourner84 - reply

Visit DanDaMano's Xanga Site!
There is a Socialist party.The Democrats (en mass) and some of the Republicans...But they're called progressive or even better..."change agents"
Posted 2/1/2008 7:45 AM by DanDaMano - reply

Visit Borg_103's Xanga Site!
Well I clearly disagree. Pro sports and college sports are apples and oranges. What I wrote about is obnoxious. Going to class (at UF) with people wearing UNC clothing is not acceptable.
Posted 2/14/2008 11:31 AM by Borg_103 - reply

Visit sojourner84's Xanga Site!
Adam, we need another thought-provoking post like your last one...
Posted 2/19/2008 12:41 PM by sojourner84 - reply

Visit Borg_103's Xanga Site!
The only reason I am considering the rail is because of the gun I am cloning. DET-1 MEU(SOC) 1911s had very small rails. Go here: http://www.10-8performance.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/lightrails.jpg

The second from the left is the rail I am talking about. I am going to mock it up and see how it feels in person before I decide what to do.
Posted 2/19/2008 1:03 PM by Borg_103 - reply

Visit Borg_103's Xanga Site!
The grip on the 1911 is a Pachmayr gunner grip per the MEU(SOC) specs. And even though the gun is still labeled as an M1911A1, I don't think it's actually called that in this configuration.

The AR lower I'm using is a Nodak-Spud XM16E1 retro lower. Here's the site: http://www.nodakspud.com/AR%20Lowers.htm

Fairly affordable stripped lowers and mine is perfect. If you want to build one, go to www.ar15.com and get to know those good folks. The Equipment Exchange on there is awesome for parts. There are M16A1 complete uppers all over the internet and they can point you in the right direction.
Posted 2/29/2008 9:25 PM by Borg_103 - reply

Visit Borg_103's Xanga Site!
Forgot--for the record, the upper I'm using is a nice old Colt SP1 slickside.
Posted 2/29/2008 9:28 PM by Borg_103 - reply

Visit Borg_103's Xanga Site!
lol, the term M1911A1 is a military designation for the standard sidearm upgraded from the M1911. The new sights, hammer, reversion to pre-A1 mainspring housing, upgraded grip safety, etc. make it no longer a M1911A1. People tend to continually call them "1911"s, but that too is a misnomer similar to calling an AR-15 an M-16. The frame is A1 spec on the Springfields, but everything else is not. Right now it's just a mutt, but when it is finished it will be a clone of a "Pistol, Caliber .45, MEU(SOC)" which all start out life as "Pistol, Caliber .45,
Automatic, Model M191lA1." So it is, but it isn't. It really does have an identity problem, haha.
Posted 2/29/2008 11:58 PM by Borg_103 - reply

Visit Borg_103's Xanga Site!
Oh, and be careful with DPMS. Their parts often have fitting problems and require smithing to work. Bushmaster is great, but pretty much all post-A1 style lowers will work with any small-hole upper. Some of the very best lowers on the market are Stag Arms lowers. Most of the big companies use the same foundry for the forging of their lowers. As I recall, Bushmaster and Stag are among them, but Stag costs a lot less. I had a Stag A3 lower, but sold it to a friend when I got a hold of the XM lower. Be careful--there is a lot of crap out there in the AR market.
Posted 3/1/2008 12:04 AM by Borg_103 - reply

Visit Borg_103's Xanga Site!
Lay off the dumb people?
Posted 3/2/2008 4:04 AM by Borg_103 - reply


Choose Identity
(?)
 
Give eProps (?)
Post a Comment
Add Link | Preview HTML comment help 
Profile Pic:
Default  |  Choose »  (?)



Back to adamtheduke's Xanga Site!
Note: your comment will appear in adamtheduke's local time zone:
GMT -06:00 (Central Standard - US, Canada)