Is God Less Glorious Because He Ordained that Evil Be?
 
Jonathan Edwards on the Decrees of God
The Jonathan Edwards Institute
Evangelicals Seeking the Glory of God
By John PiperJuly 1, 1998
 
 
Fourteen years ago Charles Colson wrote, "The western church ? much of it
drifting, enculturated, and infected with cheap grace ? desperately needs to
hear Edwards' challenge. . . . It is my belief that the prayers and work of
those who love and obey Christ in our world may yet prevail as they keep the
message of such a man as Jonathan Edwards." That conviction lies behind The
Jonathan Edwards Institute and behind this conference. And I certainly
believe it.
 
Most of us, having only been exposed to one of Edwards' sermons, "Sinners in
the Hands of An Angry God," do not know the real Jonathan Edwards. We don't
know that he knew his heaven even better than his hell, and that his vision
of the glory of God was just as ravishing as his vision of hell was
repulsive ? as it should be.
 
Most of us don't know:
 
that he is considered now, by secular and evangelical historians alike, to
be the greatest religious thinker America has ever produced
that he not only was God's kindling for the Great Awakening in the 1730's
and 1740's, but was also its most penetrating analyst and critic
that he was driven by a great longing to see the missionary task of the
church completed, and that his influence on the modern missionary movement
is immense because of his Life of David Brainerd
that he was a rural pastor for 23 years in a church of 600 people
that he was a missionary to Indians for 7 years after being asked to leave
his church
that, together with Sarah, he reared 11 faithful children
that he lived only until he was 54 and died with a library of only 300 books
but, nevertheless, his own books are still ministering mightily after 250
years.
But not as mightily as they should. Mark Noll, who teaches history at
Wheaton and has thought much about the work of Edwards has written:
 
Since Edwards, American evangelicals have not thought about life from the
ground up as Christians because their entire culture has ceased to do so.
Edwards's piety continued on in the revivalist tradition, his theology
continued on in academic Calvinism, but there were no successors to his
God-entranced world-view or his profoundly theological philosophy. The
disappearance of Edwards's perspective in American Christian history has
been a tragedy.
 
One of the burdens of this Conference, and certainly one of the burdens of
my life, is the recovery of a "God-entranced world-view." "Evangelicals
Seeking the Glory of God," in my understanding, means "evangelicals seeking
a God-entranced world view." But what I have seen over 18 years of pastoral
ministry and six years of teaching experience before that, is that people
who waver with uncertainty over the problem of God's sovereignty in the
matter of evil usually do not have a God-entranced world view. For them, now
God is sovereign, and now he is not. Now he is in control, and now he is
not. Now he is good and reliable when things are going well, and when they
go bad, well, maybe he's not. Now he's the supreme authority of the
universe, and now he is in the dock with human prosecutors peppering him
with demands that he give an account of himself.
 
But when a person settles it Biblically, intellectually and emotionally,
that God has ultimate control of all things, including evil, and that this
is gracious and precious beyond words, then a marvelous stability and depth
come into that person's life and they develop a "God-entranced world view."
When a person believes, with the Heidelberg Catechism (Question 27), that
"The almighty and everywhere present power of God . . . upholds heaven and
earth, with all creatures, and so governs them that herbs and grass, rain
and drought, fruitful and barren years, meat and drink, health and sickness,
riches and poverty, yea, all things, come not by chance, but by his fatherly
hand" ? when a person believes and cherishes that truth, they have the key
to a God-entranced world view.
 
So my aim in this second message is to commend to you this absolute
sovereign control of God over all things, including evil, because it is
Biblical, and because it will help you become stable and deep and
God-entranced and God-glorifying in all you think and feel and do.
 
And when we set our face in this direction, Jonathan Edwards becomes a great
help to us, because he wrestled with the problems of God's sovereignty as
deeply as anyone. And I want you to know how he resolved some of the
difficulties.
 
So my plan is to lay out for you some of the evidence for God's control of
all things, including evil. Then I will deal with two problems. 1. Is God
then the author of sin? 2) And why does he will that there be evil in the
world? I will close with an exhortation that you not waver before the truth
of God's sovereignty, but embrace it for the day of your own calamity.
 
1. Evidence of God's Control
 
First, then, consider the evidence that God controls all things, including
evil. When I speak of evil, I have two kinds in mind, natural and moral.
Natural evil we usually refer to as calamities: hurricanes, floods, disease,
all the natural ways that death and misery strike without human cause. Moral
evil we usually refer to as sin: murder, lying, adultery, stealing, all the
ways that people fail to love each other. So what we are considering here is
that God rules the world in such a way that all calamities and all sin
remain in his ultimate control and therefore within his ultimate design and
purpose.
 
If you are wondering whether there is a connection between this message and
the one I gave this afternoon (on the foreknowledge of God), there is. The
denial of God's foreknowledge of human and demonic choices is a buttress to
the view that God is not in control of evils in the world and therefore has
no purpose in them. God's uncertainty about what humans and demons are going
to choose strengthens the case that he does not plan those choices and
therefore does not control them or have particular purposes in them.
 
For example, Gregory Boyd, in his book God at War, says, "divine goodness
does not completely control or in any sense will evil."
 
Jesus nor his disciples seemed to understand God's absolute power as
absolute control. They prayed for God's will to be done on earth, but this
assumes that they understand that God's will was not yet being done on earth
(Mt. 6:10). Hence neither Jesus nor his disciples assumed that there had to
be a divine purpose behind all events in history. Rather, they understood
the cosmos to be populated by a myriad of free agents, some human, some
angelic, and many of them evil. The manner in which events unfold in history
was understood to be as much a factor of what these agents individually and
collectively will as it was a matter of what God himself willed.
 
In other words "the Bible does not assume that every particular evil has
particular godly purpose behind it."
 
This is diametrically opposed to what I believe the Bible teaches and what
this message is meant to commend to you for your earnest consideration.
 
1.1 Evidence that God Controls Calamity
Consider the evidence that God controls physical evil ? that is, calamity.
But keep in mind that physical evil and moral evil almost always intersect.
Many of our pains happen because human or demonic agents make choices that
hurt us. So some of this evidence can serve under both headings: God's
control of calamities and God's control of sins.
 
Life and death
 
The Bible treats human life as something God has absolute rights over. He
gives it and takes it according to his will. We do not own it or have any
absolute rights to it. It is a trust for as long as the owner wills for us
to have it. To have life is a gift and to lose it is never an injustice from
God, whether he takes it at age five or age ninety-five.
 
When Job lost his ten children at the instigation of Satan, he would not
give Satan the ultimate causality. He said, "Naked I came from my mother's
womb, And naked I shall return there. The LORD gave and the LORD has taken
away. Blessed be the name of the LORD" (Job 1:21). And, lest we think Job
was mistaken, the author adds, "In all this Job did not sin or charge God
with wrong" (Job 1:22 RSV).
 
In Deuteronomy 32:39 God says, "There is no god besides Me; It is I who put
to death and give life. I have wounded and it is I who heal, And there is no
one who can deliver from My hand." When David made Bathsheba pregnant, the
Lord rebuked him by taking the child. 2 Samuel 12:15 says, "Then the LORD
struck the child that Uriah's widow bore to David, so that he was sick . . .
. Then it happened on the seventh day that the child died." Life belongs to
God. He owes it to no one. He may give it and take it according to his
infinite wisdom. James says "You do not know what your life will be like
tomorrow. You are a vapor that appears for a little while and then vanishes
away. . . . You ought to say, 'If the Lord wills, we will live and also do
this or that'" (James 4:14-15; see 1 Samuel 2:6-7).
 
Disease
 
One of the calamities that threatens life is disease. In Exodus 4:11, God
says to Moses, when he was fearful about speaking, "Who has made man's
mouth? Who makes him dumb, or deaf, or seeing, or blind? Is it not I, the
LORD?" In other words, behind all disease and disability is the ultimate
will of God. Not that Satan is not involved; he is probably always involved
one way or the other with destructive purposes (Acts 10:38). But his power
is not decisive. He cannot act without God's permission.
 
That is one of the points of Job's sickness. When disease happened to Job,
the text makes it plain that "Satan . . . afflicted Job with sores" (Job
2:7). His wife urged him to curse God. But Job said, "Shall we indeed accept
good from God and not accept adversity" (Job 2:10). And again the author of
the book commends Job by saying, "In all this, Job did not sin with his
lips." In other words: this is a right view of God's sovereignty over Satan.
Satan is real and may have a hand in our calamities, but not the final hand,
and not the decisive hand. James makes clear that God had a good purpose in
all Job's afflictions: "You have heard of the steadfastness of Job, and you
have seen the purpose (telos) of the Lord, how the Lord is compassionate and
merciful" (James 5:11). So Satan may have been involved, but the ultimate
purpose was God's and it was "compassionate and merciful."
 
This is the same lesson we learn from 2 Corinthians 12:7 where Paul says
that his thorn in the flesh was a messenger of Satan, and yet was given for
the purpose of his own holiness. "To keep me from exalting myself, there was
given me a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to torment me ? to keep
me from exalting myself!" Now, humility is not Satan's purpose in this
affliction. Therefore the purpose is God's. Which means that Satan here is
being used by God to accomplish his good purposes in Paul's life.
 
There is no reason to believe that Satan is ever out of God's ultimate
control. Mark 1:27 says of Jesus, "He commands even the unclean spirits, and
they obey Him." And Luke 4:36 says, "With authority and power He commands
the unclean spirits and they come out." In other words, no matter how real
and terrible Satan and his demons are in this world, they remain subordinate
to the ultimate will of God.
 
Natural disasters
 
Another kind of calamity that threatens life and health is violent weather
and conditions of the earth, like earthquakes and floods and monsoons and
hurricanes and tornadoes and droughts. These calamities kill hundreds of
thousands of people. The testimony of the Scriptures is that God controls
the winds and the weather. "He called for a famine upon the land; He broke
the whole staff of bread" (Psalm 105:16). We see this same authority in
Jesus. He rebukes the threatening wind and the sea, and the disciples say,
"Even the wind and the sea obey Him" (Mark 4:39, 41).
 
Repeatedly in the Psalms God is praised as the one who rules the wind and
the lightning. "He makes the winds His messengers, Flaming fire His
ministers" (Psalm 104:4). "He makes lightnings for the rain, [he] brings
forth the wind from His treasuries" (Psalm 135:7). "He causes His wind to
blow and the waters to flow . . . Fire and hail, snow and clouds; Stormy
wind, fulfilling His word" (Psalm 147:18; 148:8; see 78:26). Isaac Watts was
right, "There's not a plant or flower below but makes your glories known;
and clouds arise and tempests blow by order from your throne." Which means
that all the calamities of wind and rain and flood and storm are owing to
God's ultimate decree. One word from him and the wind and the seas obey.
 
Destructive animals
 
Another kind of calamity that threatens life is the action of destructive
animals. When the Assyrians populated Samaria with foreigners, 2 Kings 17:25
says, "Therefore the LORD sent lions among them which killed some of them."
And in Daniel 6:22, Daniel says to the king, "My God sent His angel and shut
the lions' mouths." Other Scriptures speak of God commanding birds and bears
and donkeys and large fish to do his bidding. Which means that all
calamities that are owing to animal life are ultimately in the control of
God. He can see a pit bull break loose from his chain and attack a child;
and he could, with one word, command that its mouth be shut. Similarly he
controls the invisible animal and plant life that wreaks havoc in the world:
bacteria and viruses and parasites and thousands of microscopic beings that
destroy health and life. If God can shut the mouth of a ravenous lion, then
he can shut the mouth of a malaria-carrying mosquito and nullify every other
animal that kills.
 
All other kinds of calamities
 
Other kinds of calamities could be mentioned but perhaps we should simply
hear the texts that speak in sweeping inclusiveness about God's control
covering them all. For example, Isaiah 45:7 says God is the "The One forming
light and creating darkness, Causing well-being and creating calamity; I am
the LORD who does all these." Amos 3:6 says, "If a calamity occurs in a city
has not the LORD done it?" In Job 42:2, Job confesses, "I know that You can
do all things, And that no purpose of Yours can be thwarted." And
Nebuchadnezzar says (in Daniel 4:35), "[God] does according to his will in
the host of heaven and among the inhabitants of the earth; and none can stay
his hand or say to him, 'What are you doing?'" And Paul says, in Ephesians
1:11, that God is the one "who works all things after the counsel of His
will."
 
And if someone should raise the question of sheer chance and the kinds of
things that just seem to happen with no more meaning than the role of the
dice, Proverbs 16:33 answers: "The lot is cast into the lap, But its every
decision is from the LORD." In other words, there is no such thing as
"chance" from God's perspective. He has his purposes for every roll of the
dice in Las Vegas and every seemingly absurd turn of events in the universe.
 
This is why Charles Spurgeon, the London pastor from 100 years ago said,
 
I believe that every particle of dust that dances in the sunbeam does not
move an atom more or less than God wishes ? that every particle of spray
that dashes against the steamboat has its orbit, as well as the sun in the
heavens ? that the chaff from the hand of the winnower is steered as the
stars in their courses. The creeping of an aphid over the rosebud is as much
fixed as the march of the devastating pestilence ? the fall of . . . leaves
from a poplar is as fully ordained as the tumbling of an avalanche.
 
When Spurgeon was challenged that this is nothing but fatalism and stoicism,
he replied,
 
What is fate? Fate is this ? Whatever is, must be. But there is a difference
between that and Providence. Providence says, Whatever God ordains, must be;
but the wisdom of God never ordains anything without a purpose. Everything
in this world is working for some great end. Fate does not say that. . . .
There is all the difference between fate and Providence that there is
between a man with good eyes and a blind man.
 
1.2 God's Control over Moral Evil
Now consider the evidence for God's control over moral evil, the evil
choices that are made in the world. Again there are specific instances and
then texts that make sweeping statements of God's control.
 
For example, all the choices of Joseph's brothers in getting rid of him and
selling him into slavery are seen as sin and yet also as the outworking of
God's good purpose. In Genesis 50:20, Joseph says to his brothers when they
fear his vengeance, "As for you, you meant evil against me, but God meant it
for good in order to bring about this present result, to preserve many
people alive." Gregory Boyd and others, who do not believe that God has a
purpose in the evil choices of people (especially since he does not know
what those choices are going to be before they make them), try to say that
God can use the choices that people make for his own purposes after they
make them and he then knows what they are.
 
But this will not fit what the text says or what Psalm 105:17 says. The text
says, "You meant evil against me." Evil is a feminine singular noun. Then it
says, "God meant it for good." The word "it" is a feminine singular suffix
that can only agree with the antecedent feminine singular noun, "evil." And
the verb "meant" is the same past tense in both cases. You meant evil
against me in the past, as you were doing it. And God meant that very evil,
not as evil, but as good in the past as you were doing it. And to make this
perfectly clear, Psalm 105:17 says about Joseph's coming to Egypt, "[God]
sent a man before them, Joseph, who was sold as a slave." God sent him. God
did not find him there owing to evil choices, and then try to make something
good come of it. Therefore this text stands as a kind of paradigm for how to
understand the evil will of man within the sovereign will of God.
 
The death of Jesus offers another example of how God's sovereign will
ordains that a sinful act come to pass. Edwards says, "The crucifying of
Christ was a great sin; and as man committed it, it was exceedingly hateful
and highly provoking to God. Yet upon many great considerations it was the
will of God that it should be done." Then he refers to Acts 4:27-28, "Truly
in this city there were gathered together against Your holy servant Jesus,
whom You anointed, both Herod and Pontius Pilate, along with the Gentiles
and the peoples of Israel, to do whatever Your hand and Your purpose
predestined to occur" (see also Isaiah 53:10). In other words, all the
sinful acts of Herod, Pilate, of Gentiles and Jews were predestined to
occur.
 
Edwards ponders that someone might say that only the sufferings of Christ
were planned by God, not the sins against him, to which he responds, "I
answer, [the sufferings] could not come to pass but by sin. For contempt and
disgrace was one thing he was to suffer. [Therefore] even the free actions
of men are subject to God's disposal."
 
These specific examples (which could be multiplied by many more instances)
where God purposefully governs the sinful choices of people are generalized
in several passages. For example, Romans 9:16: "So then it does not depend
on the man who wills or the man who runs, but on God who has mercy." Man's
will is not the ultimately decisive agent in the world, God is. Proverbs
20:24: "Man's steps are ordained by the LORD, How then can man understand
his way?" Proverbs 19:21: "Many plans are in a man's heart, But the counsel
of the LORD will stand." Proverbs 21:1: "The king's heart is a stream of
water in the hand of the LORD; he turns it wherever he will." Jeremiah
10:23: "I know, O LORD, that a man's way is not in himself, Nor is it in a
man who walks to direct his steps."
 
Therefore I conclude with Jonathan Edwards, "God decrees all things, even
all sins." Or, as Paul says in Ephesians 1:11, "He works all things after
the counsel of His will."
 
2. Two Questions
 
And I pose two questions as an evangelical who is seeking the glory of God,
and who longs for a Biblical, God-entranced world-view. 1) Is God the author
of sin? 2) Why does God ordain that evil exist? What are the answers that
Jonathan Edwards gave to each of these questions?
 
2.1 Is God the Author of Sin?
Edwards answers, "If by 'the author of sin,' be meant the sinner, the agent,
or the actor of sin, or the doer of a wicked thing . . . . it would be a
reproach and blasphemy, to suppose God to be the author of sin. In this
sense, I utterly deny God to be the author of sin." But, he argues, willing
that sin exist in the world is not the same as sinning. God does not commit
sin in willing that there be sin. God has established a world in which sin
will indeed necessarily come to pass by God's permission, but not by his
"positive agency."
 
God is, Edwards says, "the permitter . . . of sin; and at the same time, a
disposer of the state of events, in such a manner, for wise, holy and most
excellent ends and purposes, that sin, if it be permitted . . . will most
certainly and infallibly follow."
 
He uses the analogy of the way the sun brings about light and warmth by its
essential nature, but brings about dark and cold by dropping below the
horizon. "If the sun were the proper cause of cold and darkness," he says,
"it would be the fountain of these things, as it is the fountain of light
and heat: and then something might be argued from the nature of cold and
darkness, to a likeness of nature in the sun." In other words, "sin is not
the fruit of any positive agency or influence of the most High, but on the
contrary, arises from the withholding of his action and energy, and under
certain circumstances, necessarily follows on the want of his influence."
 
Thus in one sense God wills that what he hates come to pass, as well as what
he loves. Edwards says,
 
God may hate a thing as it is in itself, and considered simply as evil, and
yet . . . it may be his will it should come to pass, considering all
consequences. . . . God doesn't will sin as sin or for the sake of anything
evil; though it be his pleasure so to order things, that he permitting, sin
will come to pass; for the sake of the great good that by his disposal shall
be the consequence. His willing to order things so that evil should come to
pass, for the sake of the contrary good, is no argument that he doesn't hate
evil, as evil: and if so, then it is no reason why he may not reasonably
forbid evil as evil, and punish it as such.
 
This is a fundamental truth that helps explain some perplexing things in the
Bible, namely, that God often expresses his will to be one way, and then
acts to bring about another state of affairs. God opposes hatred toward his
people, yet ordained that his people be hated in Egypt (Genesis 12:3; Psalm
105:25 ? "He turned their hearts to hate his people."). He hardens Pharaoh's
heart, but commands him to let his people go (Exodus 4:21; 5:1; 8:1). He
makes plain that it is sin for David to take a military census of his
people, but he ordains that he do it (2 Samuel 24:1; 24:10). He opposes
adultery, but ordains that Absalom should lie with his father's wives
(Exodus 20:14; 2 Samuel 12:11). He forbids rebellion and insubordination
against the king, but ordained that Jeroboam and the ten tribes should rebel
against Rehoboam (Romans 13:1; 1 Samuel 15:23; 1 Kings 12:15-16). He opposes
murder, but ordains the murder of his Son (Exodus 20:13; Acts 4:28). He
desires all men to be saved, but effectually calls only some (1 Timothy 2:4;
1 Corinthians 1:26-30; 2 Timothy 2:26).
 
What this means is that we must learn that God wills things in two different
senses. The Bible demands this by the way it speaks of God's will in
different ways. Edwards uses the terms "will of decree" and "will of
command." Edwards explains:
 
[God's] will of decree [or sovereign will] is not his will in the same sense
as his will of command [or moral will] is. Therefore it is not difficult at
all to suppose that the one may be otherwise than the other: his will in
both senses is his inclination. But when we say he wills virtue, or loves
virtue or the happiness of his creature; thereby is intended that virtue or
the creature's happiness, absolutely and simply considered, is agreeable to
the inclination of his nature. His will of decree is his inclination to a
thing not as to that thing absolutely and simply, but with reference to the
universality of things. So God, though he hates a things as it is simply,
may incline to it with reference to the universality of things.
 
This brings us to the final question and already points to the answer.
 
2.2 Why Does God Ordain that there Be Evil?
It is evident from what has been said that it is not because he delights in
evil as evil. Rather he "wills that evil come to pass . . . that good may
come of it." What good? And how does the existence of evil serve this good
end? Here is Edwards' stunning answer:
 
It is a proper and excellent thing for infinite glory to shine forth; and
for the same reason, it is proper that the shining forth of God's glory
should be complete; that is, that all parts of his glory should shine forth,
that every beauty should be proportionably effulgent, that the beholder may
have a proper notion of God. It is not proper that one glory should be
exceedingly manifested, and another not at all. . . .
 
Thus it is necessary, that God's awful majesty, his authority and dreadful
greatness, justice, and holiness, should be manifested. But this could not
be, unless sin and punishment had been decreed; so that the shining forth of
God's glory would be very imperfect, both because these parts of divine
glory would not shine forth as the others do, and also the glory of his
goodness, love, and holiness would be faint without them; nay, they could
scarcely shine forth at all.
 
If it were not right that God should decree and permit and punish sin, there
could be no manifestation of God's holiness in hatred of sin, or in showing
any preference, in his providence, of godliness before it. There would be no
manifestation of God's grace or true goodness, if there was no sin to be
pardoned, no misery to be saved from. How much happiness soever he bestowed,
his goodness would not be so much prized and admired. . . .
 
So evil is necessary, in order to the highest happiness of the creature, and
the completeness of that communication of God, for which he made the world;
because the creature's happiness consists in the knowledge of God, and the
sense of his love. And if the knowledge of him be imperfect, the happiness
of the creature must be proportionably imperfect.
 
So the answer to the question in the title of this message, "Is God less
glorious because he ordained that evil be?" is no, just the opposite. God is
more glorious for having conceived and created and governed a world like
this with all its evil. The effort to absolve him by denying his
foreknowledge of sin (as we saw this afternoon) or by denying his control of
sin (which we have seen this evening) is fatal, and a great dishonor to his
word and his wisdom. Evangelicals who are seeking the glory of God, look
well to the teaching of your churches and your schools. But most of all,
look well to your souls.
 
If you would see God's glory and savor his glory and magnify his glory in
this world, do not remain wavering before the sovereignty of God in the face
of great evil. Take his book in your hand, plead for his Spirit of
illumination and humility and trust, and settle this matter, that you might
be unshakable in the day of your own calamity. My prayer is that what I have
said will sharpen and deepen your God-entranced world view, and that in the
day of your loss you will be like Job who, when he lost all his children,
fell down and worshipped, and said, "The LORD gave and the LORD has taken
away. Blessed be the name of the LORD."