Weblog

Saturday, July 19, 2008

  • Are Most Men Sex Addicts?

    Here's a self-assessment quiz from Pine Grove Behavior Health and Addiction Services about sex addiction. It's a live-in treatment center for addictions. On staff is the well known and respected psychologist specializing in sex addiction, Patrick Carnes. Do these apply to you?

    1. Have you experienced difficulty resisting impulses to engage in sexual behaviors?
    2. Have you tried to stop, control, or reduce these behaviors?
    3. Have you thought of killing yourself because of your sexual behaviors?
    4. Have you experienced legal consequences due to your sexual behaviors?
    5. Do you spend large amounts of time trying to get sex or recover from being sexual?
    6. Do you ever feel anxious or irritable if you are unable to engage in sexual behaviors?
    7. Do you worry that others will find out about your sexual activities?
    8. Do you often find yourself preoccupied with sexual thoughts?
    9. Do you feel that your sexual behavior is not normal?
    10. Are you experiencing family problems as a result of your behaviors?

    How many men could answer no to all of these? Especially 1, 2, 5, 6, 8? I think most men would answer "yes" to several of the above.

    Is it that the quiz is too sensitive, or is that most men are sex addicts?

    How about women? I wonder if women are really much less sexual than men, or are they just more inhibited in their expression, or do they express it in different ways or at different times. Most of my former girlfriends actually weren't much less interested in sex than I was, if at all.

    Still, one does get the sense that the male sex drive, at least, is out of hand. Consider this quote from C.S. Lewis (from Mere Christianity):

    "Chastity is the most unpopular of the Christian virtues. There is no getting away from it: the old Christian rule is, 'Either marraige, with complete faithfulness to your partner, or else total abstinence.' Now this is so difficult and so contrary to our instincts, that obviously either Christianity is wrong or our sexual instinct, as it now is, has gone wrong. One or the other. Of course, being a Christian, I think it is the instinct which has gone wrong.

    "But I have other reasons for thinking so. The biological purpose of sex is children, just as the biological purpose of eating is to repair the body. Now if we eat whenever we feel inclined and just as much as we want, it is quite ture that most of us will eat too much: nut not terifically too much. One man may eat enough for two, but he does not eat enough for ten. The appetige goes a little beuond its biological purpose, but not enormously. But if a healthy young man indulged his sexual appetite whenever he felt inclined, and if each act produced a baby, then in ten years he might easily populate a small village. This appetite is in ludicrous and preposterous excess of its function.

    "Or take it another way. You can get a large audience together for a strip-tease act---that is, to watch a girl undress on the stage. Now suppose you came to a country where you could fill a theatre by simply bringing a covered plate on to the stage and then slowly lifting the cover so as to let every one see, just before the lights went out, that it contained a mutton chop or a bit of bacon, would you not think that in that country something had gone wrng with the appetite for food? And would not anyone who had grown up in a different world think there was something equally queer about the state of the sex instinct among us?"

    Hmm. So are most men sex addicts?


Thursday, July 17, 2008

  • God Thirst

    Last night I was thinking about what life would be like if I got what I wanted, at least everything on earth I could want. I don't want to get into details about what that life would be like -- typical things.

    I still felt, honestly, like that wouldn't be enough. I'd be unhappy. There's something deep beneath everything that I thirst for. What else could that be but God?

    For me that's my crucial life question upon which everything else rests: Do I look for God, or not? If I decide "Not," then I gotta find my happiness in this world, this life. That just doesn't seem that fulfilling to me.

    The God of the Bible upsets me, as do a lot of passages in it. But I still want that deep thing underneath, or beyond, the World.

    This is a bit of relief for me. I was afraid that my "God thirst" really was a way to avoid the pain of not having the courage to go out and get the worldly things. Those things require an ability to compete, and I don't like doing that. Having the God of the Bible is easy: all you have to do is believe.

    Well, not exactly easy, for once you believe, according to the Bible, God steps into your life and changes it, and this process includes a lot of painful tests and difficult challenges. Still, having help from God is quite a comfort. The "crutch" infidels complain about. Part of me was afraid that I needed to give up this cosmic comfort blanket or Teddy Bear and sleep alone in the dark like a big boy. That's what Freud and Nietzsche would say.

    My fear was that I needed to change, to put all my efforts toward getting the worldly life (not necessarily scandelous things, maybe just a nice house in the suburbs with a cute wife and a Mini Cooper).

    I lie to myself when I say I want something more. I just want that, but because it seems out of reach, I say that it's not so great after all, and that God is better. Comforting words when you don't want to risk going out and getting what you want.

    Success here! Here! And it's all on me, no Father in the sky: if I fail it's on me, if I succeed, it will be because I made it happen. God is a tool of avoidance, of not taking this responsibility.

    But I don't think this is right, for I have a pretty good imagination, and my thought experiment honestly made me think I want something more than anything available in this world.

    This isn't anything like an argument for the existence of God, btw. It's an argument for looking for God.

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

  • Flirty Taken Women (and Guys)

    Again, taking a break from hardcore philosophy (I just submitted my journal article revisions, and am tired). So it's to the lower brain I go.

    Is it just me, or are there a lot of women who are taken and flirt with other guys? Does it seem the same to women, about taken guys being more flirty?

    Doesn't it seem a bit unfaithful?

    I sometimes get frustrated when a taken woman flirts with me. I get far more flirts from taken (and even married) women than single, avaliable women. I even had an attractive married woman throw herself at me! But this never happens with single attractive women. I don't like it. It's like clouds without rain, a sunny day and you have a 12 hour shift in the office with no windows. It's especially frustrating when I find the woman attractive. I usually try to distance myself from such women.

    Yet the single girls clam up. Hmm. I'm sure some of it is due to lack of interest. But still, I wonder why it seems that the marrieds/takens flirt with me a lot more. Do other guys have the same experience? Do women have the same experience with men?

    When I'm in a relationship, I cease flirting. I feel I like it's not being true. Plus it makes me less attracted to the girl I'm dating. I start comparing, etc. A recent survey from McGill said this is true of most men. The same article said that women are more attached to their guy after flirting with other guys.  Is that true?

    I guess then if your wife or girlfriend starts flirting with other guys, it's not a such a bad thing -- you may receive more affection as a result. If your boyfriend or husband starts flirting, however, then trouble is brewing.

    In any case, it's hard on us lonely single guys when we see that big juicy lollipop dangling in front of us, if it belongs to someone else.

    These are just casual observations, of course.

    Edit: It would be nice to have a survey: do people with S.O.s flirt more, less, or the same as people without?

    A theory -- people who naturally flirt a lot are more likely to be taken than those who don't naturally flirt very much. So it isn't the fact that they are taken that makes them flirt as much as their flirting makes them be taken. They are just being themselves.



Monday, July 14, 2008

  • Is Porn Okay?

    I mean, in moderation, of course. No sitting in front of the computer masturbating for hours and such. But just here and there, watching some woman's body (or several women's bodies), or watching a couple have sex. Okay, and masturbating to it, but only now and then, once every few days, or everyday, just as long as it doesn't interfere with that person's life and responsibilities. What's wrong with that?

    Furthermore, can't a married man, or a man in a relationship, enjoy a little porn here and there? Why do Christians have to label him as pathological (the previous post is, of course, coming from a conservative Evangelical Christian point of view, a view that sees all porn as pathological: Elderedge is just offering his explanation of why, the fact that it is pathological is assumed)? Christians believe porn is a sin, but why?

    Of course I am being a bit facetious; I'm still a Christian, and hold the Christian view. 

    Here's one reason from the Christian point of view. Christians have strict ideas about marital infidelity -- I consider getting off to porn cheating, and that's a sin. (Edit: see Exodus 20:14, compare with Matt. 5:28) So I couldn't do it if I were married with good conscience. Of course, I know a lot of guys disagree. 

    There is also the idea of sexual purity.  It's a conservative value; liberals don't care about it. But isn't there something good about a person who saves himself for his spouse, or if there is no spouse, for God? (An interesting article by Haidt and Graham comparing conservative and liberal morality can be found here.)

    I'd like others to chime in. Especially women -- would you be okay with your S.O. masturbating to porn (yes, that's what guys do with it, at least a good amount of the time)? Non-Christian guys who think porn is okay, do you think that women who feel that it's wrong are wrongheaded, don't understand guys, and the rest? Why?

    Edit: I didn't realize there was such diversity of opinion among women. I thought they were mostly against it, or looked down on those who did it. I wonder if the ok/not-oks to porn run down religious lines.

Saturday, July 12, 2008

  • Pornography and Weak Men

    What do you think of this quote?

    "Why is pornography the number one snare for men? He longs for the beauty, but without his fierce and passionate heart he cannot find her or win her or keep her. Though he is powerfully drawn to the woman, he does not know how to fight for her or even that he is to fight for her. Rather, he finds her mostly a mystery that he knows he cannot solve and so at a soul level he keeps his distance. And privately, secretly, he turns to the immitation. What makes pornography so addictive is that more than anything else in a lost man's life, it makes him feel like a man whithout ever requireing a thing of him. The less a guy feels like a real man in the presence of a real woman, the more vulnerable he is to porn." From Wild at Heart, by John Eldredge

    It's a bit of pop Christian literature, I know, but I tend to see his way here.

    Partly because of feminism, men have been given the impression that they aren't to fight to find, win, or keep their women. According to them we are supposed to be equals who enter into some sort of mutual contract of care and understanding or something like that. It's also that they don't realise that women, regardless of their complaints (or at least how they used to complain about masculinity, back when feminism was more powerful), want men who are wild, and valiant. Men don't realize (or want to realize) that they have to be conquerors, at least of themselves and their fears, if they are to really find the beauty they crave.

believeordoubt

  • Visit believeordoubt's Xanga Site
    • Name: believeordoubt
    • Member Since: 4/2/2007

Networks

[no networks]

Weblog Archives

Don't worry - your calendar is here… to see it in action just click "Save" above and refresh the page.

Pulse

  • I started reading Chalmer's The Conscious Mind. Anyone interested in reading it as well - as sort of a book club kind of thing?
  • Just ordered Anthony Flew's Book *There is a God*. I 'm interested in how he converted, being a well known defender of atheism.