David1949
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit David1949's Xanga Site!

Name: David
Country: United States
State: Indiana
Birthday: 6/22/1949
Gender: Male


Interests: Family, theology, engineering, photography, & biking
Expertise: Jack of several things, master of none
Occupation: Engineering


Message: message meEmail: email me


Member Since: 1/23/2004

SubscriptionsSites I Read
Schwartzkopf

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Saturday, December 03, 2005

Bible Prophecy – Figuring It Out

Recent events have once again brought me in touch with people who have a highly organized and systematized method of interpreting Bible prophecy. These people by their teaching in lessons, sermons, and books give every indication of having “figured it out” and in rather intricate detail. I have definitely read and heard enough from those who have “figured it out” that it would seem that I should also by now have “figured it out.” But, I confess that I have not “figured it out.” I would readily admit that this might be an evidence of a defect in me, either an intellectual shortcoming or a stubbornness of character – possibly a combination of the two. Beyond that, I know that I am sometimes unable to see my flaws with the clarity that I should. Frankly, the flaws that I can see with clarity bother me far more than those that are somewhat veiled from my view, but I know that I have both. In this situation, the possible flaw on my part would be one of those veiled from my view because I have done and continue to do my best to not be intellectually lazy or dishonest in my consideration of the facts.

However, having said all of that, I am surely not alone in my yet incomplete quest to understand Bible prophecy, regardless of the reason. Further, it is apparent to me that I am bound by the love commanded by my Lord to extend grace to those who do believe they have it figured out – even when they seem to me arrogant in their personal knowledge, even when they seem obnoxious, and even when they make what appear to me to be leaps of logic that make the physical jumps of an Evil Knivel or other dare devils like him to be nothing in comparison. I can also hope that the ones who do have it figured out will be compelled by the same love to extend grace to me as one of the slower brothers in getting it all figured out. Based on Scripture, the mutual extension of grace that I have just described is as fundamental to being Christian as any acceptance of a theological understanding, regardless of how certain one may be of that understanding. It is in the exercise of Christian virtues that we most openly demonstrate our faith, and not in the recesses of our minds as we establish finer points of doctrine based on our current human understanding of Scripture. Jesus said:

“A new command I give you: Love one another. As I have loved you, so you must love one another. By this (singular) all men will know that you are my disciples, if you love one another.” (John 13:34-35 NIV, emphasis mine)

The mandate for this mutual extension of love and grace is of greater importance than anything I will say in the remainder of this writing. (But I hope you will read on anyway.) Without a mutual extension of love and grace, topics such as Bible prophecy will generate ill will, rancor, and even outright division in the body of Christ. Regrettably, it already has and undoubtedly will continue to do so. It is not that the topic of Bible prophecy does not matter – it does. It is that the divine edict to love one another matters supremely.

The fact that a huge part of Scripture is prophecy (the common estimate is that about one-third of all of the Bible is prophecy) indicates that it matters to God. I want to focus on what seems to me to be a key reason why it does matter, and the reason goes beyond the mere volume of information that has been placed in the Bible about it or our ability to figure out all of the details of it.

The mere existence of Bible prophecy says something about the nature of God. It is an expression of what scholars commonly refer to as His “omniscience” – His knowing all. This is poignantly illustrated in the following quotation from Scripture:

I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like me. I make known the end from the beginning, from ancient times, what is still to come. I say: My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please. (Isa. 46:9-10 NIV)

This aspect of knowing “the end from the beginning” is indeed amazing, but God’s nature involves more than His being a super computer beyond all others with a database of knowledge that spans all times and places. That characteristic alone would make the declaration of God, “There is none like me,” true. But even beyond that, there is the detail that God is a communicator. He says, “I make known,” so while we may not know everything, He has let us in on some things that we could not have known by ourselves with our human limitations. This is truly amazing that such a great God would care enough to include us in the circle of knowledge that only He knows. But beyond all of that, there is the sovereignty of God staring us in the face – “My purpose will stand, and I will do all that I please.” So prophecy emphatically declares all of these things – He is an omniscient; He communicates to us, and above all, He is sovereign!

Seeing the core characteristics of God displayed brilliantly in full color through Bible prophecy is as important, if not more so, than any of the minute details of it that men think they have figured out. In fact, as I communicate with those who believe they have it figured out, I often get a strong sense that they have so focused on the details and have so honed their ability to elaborate on their view and put down opposing views that they are at risk of loosing the core truths conveyed by Bible prophecy. If it is so simple, then why do not more people agree on it? Answer: it is not that simple. It is God at work doing all that He pleases.

My recent encounter with those who convey the idea that they have “figured it out” was unique in that they take a quite different angle of approach to Bible prophecy and the resulting view is also significantly different than I have encountered previously. This difference is no small deal for I have met sincere people who feel they have figured out Bible prophecy who hold widely varying views. In most cases, there is no way to integrate their divergent views. The basic building blocks of their different views are so different, which explains why they end up with radically different conclusions about Bible prophecy. It also explains why there is no logical way to integrate their variant views. The only ways that an integrated view of Bible prophecy could be established would be for one of the parties to convince the other parties of their point of view – and that is not likely -- or for the parties to build a new view from the ground up using different building blocks – an even less likely possibility.

Modern-day Christians discussing prophecy is a great deal like Job’s three friends discussing the great misfortunes that Job experienced. There were plenty of opinions being given, but in short, none of them had a real clue about the nature of what was happening. After Job’s three friends “ran out of gas” and became quiet, a young man named Elihu spoke out of his frustration and anger at hearing all that had been said. Elihu did not have a clue about the nature of what was happening either, but he did have the good sense to recognize that he did not. So in the midst of not knowing, he issued a statement that has triggered many a devotional thought throughout the ages to draw people’s focus to God when he said:

“How great is God – beyond our understanding!” (Job 36:26 NIV)

It is interesting that the three friends of Job that are most commonly mentioned (Eliphaz, Bildad, and Zophar) were later chastised by God for what they said, but Elihu was not. Elihu’s point to the three friends and to Job was to show that they were foolish for thinking that they had God all figured out. What Job needed to do was reflect on God's creation as proof that God is infinitely wise – that He knows exactly what He is doing in all circumstances even when we don't. If you read the conversation of God with Job in Job 38-41, this same theme is repeated over and over again as God asks Job questions that he cannot answer, challenges him to do things that he cannot do, and keeps pointing out things that distinguish an awesome God from even one of His servants like Job. A similar New Testament Scripture expresses the same kind of exclamatory sentiments:

“Oh, the depth of the riches of the wisdom and knowledge of God! How unsearchable his judgments, and his paths beyond tracing out!” (Rom. 11:33 NIV)

Our God is no simpleton, and we should not expect His plans to be simple either.

It is with this sense of awe of God’s greatness of knowledge, power, and sovereignty that I confess to a real feeling of discomfort when I am under the gun of those who think they have Bible prophecy figured out regardless of the system of interpretation that is taken by the person with the gun. The beauty of the common dispensationalist view of premillennialism is its contemporariness and its ability to always be finding modern-day fulfillments of Bible prophecy happening or about to happen as the news feeds from the Middle East pour in day by day. For the preterists who see most – if not all – Bible prophecy as having been already fulfilled, the beauty of their position is its simplicity. Almost everything that might be made to be yet future by other positions is interpreted to apply to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. Forgive me for generalizing these positions that usually take books to explain, and forgive me if I have not even mentioned a view that you hold. The fact that any of the systematized views take books to explain and the ability for me to end up with encapsulations as I have given them should give us all pause. It seems to me that any position that prides itself on having spun all the pieces of the puzzle together to make them fit is at high risk of loosing a sense of awe of the Almighty. And for me, that is no small risk.

Each of the views has their “beauty” – as I have termed it – meaning their appealing characteristics, but real beauty in the creation of God is always more elaborate and glorious than beauty that we fully observe or create. I may try to paint a sunset, but I cannot fully capture the span and intensity of colors that God has placed in a sunset by virtue of His having created it. Even if I could capture all of the color information in a beautiful sunset, I have not fully captured it. The God-created principles of physics that determine the production of the colors is yet another layer of knowledge that in my focus on the artistic aspects would seldom even receive a passing thought. And in this short discussion, we have only scratched the surface of things that make a sunset what it really is. And yet, God continues to paint them every day and often without any cognizance from us. God is a God of complexity.

In my view, the common and highly systemized methods of interpretation of Bible prophecy tend to over simplify the complexity with which a sovereign God is known to operate. In so doing, the stunning elegance and glory of God’s working is missed or in some cases possibly even demeaned. I fear it is so even if it is not done so intentionally.

There is a mystical characteristic to God that is lost if we “know” so much that there is no longer any real mystery remaining about God. Webster defines the word “mystical” as “having a spiritual meaning or reality that is neither apparent to the senses nor obvious to the intelligence.” Now having just come through the modernistic age where so much emphasis was placed on reason and our ability to know, this may seem foreign to our mindset, but this concept is not foreign to Scripture, and as we grasp the awesomeness of God it is only natural that we must also be struck with the concept.

Some mysteries have been made known, and the Bible clearly speaks of this, so in spite of my skepticism of the detailed views that I have heard, I am not saying that it is impossible for Bible prophecy to be understood and that all of Bible prophecy must remain in the dense fog of the totally unknowable. It is noteworthy that the same context of Romans 11 that speaks of not wanting us “to be ignorant of this mystery” is the same context that speaks of God’s judgments being “unsearchable” and “his paths past finding out.” (Rom. 11:25, 33) It is for this reason that I will continue to study what He has revealed to us in His word and remain open to people of good will who have insights to share and who are open to dialogue – even with those who think they have it figured out.

As that process to figure things out has gone forward, it has become increasingly apparent that none of us has it all figured out. That is okay. It is yet another reflection of our incomplete knowledge and inability to understand fully in constrast to God’s full knowledge. In the meantime, those of us who do not have it all figured out can simply say to the One Who does have it all figured out:

There is a whole lot that I do not know. I still do not have it all figured out, but through it all, I still trust you Lord. I know that You are sovereign, and I trust you to bring all things to completion according to Your perfect plan. Amen.


Wednesday, July 20, 2005

“Still There”

In Memory of Donald G. Hunt

Donald G. Hunt, a family friend and hero of the Christian faith, passed from this life on July 1, 2005. Those who discovered him primarily through his prolific writing of books, tracts, charts, and his editorship of the periodical called “The Voice of Evangelism” knew him as “Donald G. Hunt.” To those who spent any length of time with him in person came to know him affectionately as simply “Brother Hunt.” I knew him primarily from a distance, and not up close and personal, so it may seem unusual that I would be writing about him. He was a college level instructor, yet I never had him as an instructor in any of my college classes. In fact, I never attended Midwestern School of Evangelism where he taught for nearly 60 years. He led in several churches throughout his many years of preaching, yet I never was a co-worker of his in any of those ventures. I was not even a member of any of those churches where he was a leader. Beyond all of that, I have no biological family ties to him. I am not a son, a nephew, or even a distant cousin. Nonetheless, this man figures prominently in my heritage of faith. While his influence on my life has seldom been direct, he has touched my life through numbers of other people with whom he did have close and direct contact.

My first contact with Brother Hunt was back in the mid-50’s as a young grade school child when he came to speak on mid-winter preaching rallies at the church where our family attended. My last contact with him was a little over a month before he died, but again it was more incidental than substantive. He had come with his wife, Margaret, for her to participate in the remake of a recording that she and the Gee Twins (Barb Prilliman and Sandra James) had made back in the 60’s. He was just there. He did not sing. He did not play the piano. He did not help with the sound system. He did not offer suggestions to the musicians. He did not even engage in a great deal of conversation although he was polite and friendly, for he was busy working with items he had brought in his attache case. (See picture.) He was just there.

For me, the statement, “He was just there,” says a great deal about the life of Brother Hunt. It is a very terse but yet emphatic description of his life for me and perhaps thousands more like me. It is in the solidness of just being there, faithfully doing a job, that consistency and stability are demonstrated -- day in and day out -- when it is easy and when it is tough – when it has kudos associated with it and when it has complaints and criticisms associated with it. To use Biblical terminology, it is doing the job both “in season and out of season.” (2 Tim. 4:2 NIV) It is standing “firm,” letting “nothing move you.” (1 Cor. 15:58 NIV) It is not becoming “weary in doing good.” (Gal. 6:9 NIV) It is holding “unswervingly to the hope we profess.” (Heb. 10:23 NIV) It is “persistence in doing good.” (Rom. 2:7 NIV) In short, it is being “faithful, even to the point of death.” (Rev. 2:10 NIV) These all would be fitting descriptions of the rock-solid nature of Brother Hunt’s life of faith.

The characteristic “cool, calm, and collected” nature of Brother Hunt can easily lead one to believe that he never faced significant difficulties and problems. However, such is not the case. Even in his autobiography, “My Cup Runneth Over!” he has a chapter called “Difficult 60’s.” – although in characteristic Brother Hunt fashion, he spends less than one of the eight pages of the chapter addressing the difficulties and quickly moves on to talk about other things. His nature was to be a shock absorber rather than a shock generator, and that characteristic will long live in my memory of his life. Oh, that his kind were multiplied! His life had far more ups and downs to it than his demeanor and responses would have indicated. His level demeanor merely serves as yet another example of this man “just being there” – consistent, insistent, and persistent with the truth he had determined from Scripture. He had an anchor placed in something more firm than the shifting sands of public opinion regardless of whose “public” was involved. Consequently, as the winds of difficulties blew, you may have seen the storms lash out at him, but you really did not see his ship of life shift much. Even in the midst of the storm and beyond, you would see him still there.

Brother Hunt was like the musical portrait painted by Francis Scott Key in our national anthem. Regardless of the fiery assaults, the song says that “our flag was still there.” Brother Hunt was a lot like that. It was not that he was “just there.” It was that as time passed, he was still there! In fact, if we follow the imagery of the national anthem, it was the “rocket’s red glare, the bombs bursting in air” – those items that reflect the raging of a battle – that gave “proof through the night that our flag was still there.” And the “proof” was given on “through the night.” And it was not just “through the night,” for the anthem indicates that the flag “does … yet wave.” And in a subsequent verse that we seldom sing, it indicates that into the future it “shall wave.” In the span of my lifetime, perhaps no man epitomizes for me this principle of being stable, fixed in his resolve, always the same, and always still there than Brother Hunt. The passing of time with its inherent mix of trials places a badge of honor on those who endure. Those people become a point of reference of faith for others. This one aspect of Brother Hunt’s life deserves emphasis in our modern day world where few things last very long, and everything from diapers to marriages is considered disposable.

Again, I have never been close to Brother Hunt. However, it has been my privilege to know those who have been close to him. My father-in-law, Carl Corder, was a friend of Brother Hunt fairly early in life. They became friends even before Brother Hunt went to Bible college to prepare for the preaching ministry. Brother Hunt mentions my father-in-law in his autobiography as being his partner in some of his very first Bible studies. Their mutual friendship at that early age cemented a friendship that lasted a lifetime. While my father-in-law never chose to preach as his life’s vocation, he was nonetheless a close friend and supporter of Brother Hunt throughout his life. When I recently reread Brother Hunt’s autobiography, I noted that the details about his Saturday night Bible studies with my father-in-law are a part of a series of events that he describes as a “sacred process.” “Sacred” for Brother Hunt in that it ultimately led him into the preaching ministry, but “sacred” also for the father of my wife, “sacred” for my wife, and ultimately “sacred” for me too. For in those Saturday night studies were birthed not only a lifelong friendship between the Hunt and Corder family, but a love for the Scriptures was also birthed and nourished that was passed on to my wife who has now been my life’s partner for well over thirty years. Oh sure, I doubt that Brother Hunt and Dad Corder were thinking too much in their studies about the only Corder daughter that was to be born a few years after that, and I seriously doubt that they had any inclination whatsoever about the husband-to-be of Carl’s only daughter that would come along years later. But the fact remains that because Brother Hunt and Dad Corder established a friendship focused on the Bible, I am the beneficiary. The influence of those studies is not fully known, nor can it be, but it is just there – still there.

In the early heritage of my faith, no one is more significant than my own parents. When I began the fourth grade, my father began as a freshman at MSE to study for the ministry. (For an adventure in faith, see my dad’s testimony of those years in the newly republished book on the web, Telling on God at www.FaithLegacy.info.) I do not know the extent of the Donald G. Hunt-Al Schwartzkopf connection, but I know they became friends for life also. As was common with farm children in my father’s generation, my father never completed high school. So to embark on a college level regiment of study was a daunting undertaking. Brother Hunt, along with other men at MSE, I know inspired a great deal of confidence in my father for him to quit a good-paying job, sell the family home, and move our family of four to Ottumwa so that he could begin studying for the ministry. Again, there is no way the influence of the hours spent by my father in the classroom with Brother Hunt along with their one-on-one exchanges over the years can be fully known, and how much of it spilled over on me in the sermons, lessons, and things that I heard as a young person growing up, but it is nonetheless there – still there.

I have long known the “Hunt boys.” We have never been close, but we have always known each other from a fairly young age. Of course, to me the “Hunt boys” are Don and Ron since Rich was not part of the mix when I was a boy. There were only two “Hunt boys” in those years. In recent years – actually months – it has been my privilege to become better acquainted with Don Jr. in the projects we are planning together to mark our spiritual heritage in work we have called “Legacy.” There has periodically been a flurry of e-mails that have gone back and forth discussing our growing up years and people who figured prominently into those years. It is in these discussions that I have had yet another glimpse of Brother Hunt. The comments were passing comments, but the fact that they were random recollections of days gone by adds credibility and emphasis to them. While none of them betray a confidence, many of them reflect a personal knowledge that would make them inappropriate to share in a public forum. However, the really up close and personal observations fit the public man I have observed over the years in church meetings. He was not a different man in public than he was in private. In fact, it is children who see the more private side of a parent’s life. I was touched when recently I received an e-mail from Don Jr. with subject line of “Donald Hunt from one of his son’s perspective” that he wrote the day after an emotion-filled evening visit to his father's grave. In the e-mail, he listed over 30 items about his father that he said were “things that I appreciated about having the earthly father that God allowed me to live with, grow up around 24/7, watch his life, and listen to his answers.” It is a very impressive list with descriptions of his dad that includes words and phrases like “unconditional love that seemed to know no limits,” “hungered for the Word of God every day – so his well never ran dry,” “challenged people in his world to excel,” “a quiet man,” “a lover of home,” “a zest for life,” “a zeal of steel,” “flexible, yet firm,” “honored his wife and refused to ever argue or speak unkindly to her,” “approachable,” “would not compromise his beliefs for anyone, anywhere, any time.” And so goes a sampling of the list. I responded to his e-mail by recalling the words of Scripture, “And by faith he still speaks, even though he is dead.” (Heb. 11:4 NIV) And then I added, “I’d say he was talking to you last night, and he has talked today to those of us who have been the recipients of your written thoughts, and the neat thing is: he is not done talking.” In Don Jr.’s growing up years and even in his adult years, the influence of his father was just there, but it is still there through the multitude of memories of his life. Beyond that, it is still there through the life of his children and grandchildren.

My wife’s experience with the Hunts predated my arrival on the scene, but I have been privileged to have a somewhat up close and personal knowledge of them through her eyes. She attended MSE, so not merely as the daughter of special friends of the Hunts, but through four years of college at MSE, working at the college, and traveling with the Hunts to work with the church in Des Moines on weekends along with some travel with them to rallies, my wife came to known the Hunts quite well. In a recent e-mail to a friend who did not know the Hunts, she explained that we had gone to a funeral for a friend that she considered like a “second father.” Now my wife is a very loving person, but to call someone a “second father” is no trivial epithet from her. It conveys a degree of respect and admiration that has few parallels. Her experience, however, is not isolated. Many of her college friends still recall fondly the days at MSE and their association with Brother Hunt. Respect and admiration that spans decades is indeed an honor. Many a college instructor and work associate are soon forgotten after the college years and work relationships end, but it has not been so with Brother Hunt. He made a mark many years ago. Yes, he was just there, but that mark for good is still there.

The mark of a man’s life is a composite of many things, but the summation of man’s life is perhaps best characterized by what is still there when he leaves the bonds of earth. It is for that purpose that I have chosen to note this key characteristic of the life of Brother Hunt. I, who only knew him primarily through the eyes of others and through my brief occasions of contact with him over the years, consider it important to note the powerful spread of the influence of his life. His influence was wide as well as deep. I count it a privilege to have been within the reach of the breadth of the sphere of his positive influence. His influence lives on. In a real sense, he was not simply just there – he is still there.


Friday, February 04, 2005

Legacy – A Celebration of Faith


If you are a person of faith in God, you are the recipient of a legacy of faith whether you fully realize it or not. This legacy connects you to people of faith that we know about from the Bible who lived many years before you were ever born. At a most personal level, this legacy is composed of links between you and people of faith who have touched your life directly. Often, the most significant personal legacy links are the ones that cross generational boundaries to those whose lifetime experiences have overlapped ours. Legacy links us to the past, and it will link us to the future.


Faith Legacy as Seen in Timothy

This concept is illustrated for us in Scripture when Paul wrote to Timothy:


“I have been reminded of your sincere faith, which first lived in your grandmother Lois and in your mother Eunice and, I am persuaded, now lives in you also.” (2 Timothy 1:5 NIV)


You see faith lived in Timothy, but before it ever lived in him, it lived first in his grandmother and mother. There was more than a biological link between Timothy and his grandmother and mother. There was a link of faith to them. Many of us have been similarly blessed.


Timothy’s legacy of faith is further seen in that the Apostle Paul referred to him as his “son in the faith.” (1 Timothy 1:1 NIV) This faith link is clearly seen in the two epistles that are contained in our Scriptures that are addressed to him. Paul also used the endearing term of “son” when he was speaking to others about him. (See 1 Corinthians 4:17, Philippians 2:22) Even those of us who were blessed with Christian parents have other key mentors of faith who have richly blessed our lives.


In Paul’s final letter to Timothy, he repeats his “my son” form of addressing him and affixes an instruction to it. The instruction is to “entrust” what he has heard “to reliable men who will also be qualified to teach others.” (2 Timothy 2:1-2 NIV) The legacy of faith is to go on. We as sons of faith are to become fathers of faith to yet other sons.


Faith Legacy as Seen in “the Big Picture” of Scripture

This concept of a legacy of faith is nowhere treated as elaborately as in Scripture in Hebrews 11. It is indeed the “big picture” of the concept of the legacy of faith. The writer’s appeal to stand firm in faith is done by an appeal to heroes from the Old Testament. In this appeal, the writer does one of the fastest run throughs of Old Testament history that you will find anywhere. It is the Indy 500 version of Old Testament history. As you see specific historical characters and events speed by your view, you see the legacy of faith concept displayed brilliantly. Faith is the single thread through it all. No single chapter in Scripture comes close to mentioning faith as frequently as this chapter. The uses of the term “faith” in Hebrews 11 accounts for nearly 10% of all the uses of the term “faith” in the entire King James Bible, but it is only one chapter out of 1,189 chapters in the Bible (0.08%). It has been appropriately labeled the "faith chapter." Others seeking to emphasize its celebratory qualities have called it "The Hall of Faith," making a designation that sounds similar to "The Hall of Fame." To be sure, there is a tie of faith back to those whose lips went silent long ago. In the drive to encourage his readers to persevere in running the race of the Christian life, the Hebrew writer selected people from their history to showcase living by faith.


When you read Hebrews, you should feel as though you are looking over the shoulder of a first century Hebrew Christian. Oh sure, they would be dressed quite different than you, speak a different language than you, be far poorer in material possessions than you, and be different in a host of other ways, but they would share with you a common faith and the need to persevere in it. The words of encouragement penned by the Hebrew writer are for you as well. So go ahead and imagine yourself as that Hebrew Christian as you read the words on the paper in front of you. If it helps, mentally put on the sandals and robe that a first century Hebrew Christian would likely be wearing.


As a student of Scripture, the names would jump off the page at you -- Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Joseph, Moses, Rahab, Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, Samuel, etc. -- all names that you would readily recognize from your knowledge of the Old Testament history. They would be as common to you as George Washington and Abraham Lincoln are to you now because of your knowledge of American history. A legacy of faith includes both the elements of familiarity and faith. The faith element is by far the most important one, but the link to us is born out of the familiarity element. A spiritual heritage consists of people with whom we have familiarity that have demonstrated faith to us.


The listing of people’s names and the persistent references to their actions done “by faith” are sandwiched in between an introductory preview that says, “This (faith) is what the ancients were commended for” and a concluding summary that says, “These all were commended for their faith.” (Hebrews 11:1, 39) It was a connection to the “ancients” (literally, the elders – those much older), but it was specifically a connection of faith. There was a connection to real people with real faith.


It was not that these people were perfect. Far from it. We know about a number of faults in these people’s lives from the Old Testament. The proverbial "good, bad, and the ugly" are all there and often in explicit and incriminating detail. One of the marks of the genuineness of the Scriptures is that the faults of its heroes are not hidden from view or sugar coated. Without question, the heroes of faith of Hebrews 11 were people of faults, but more importantly above all else, they were people of faith. (Remember both the preview and summary of the chapter states that they were “commended” for their faith.) Consequently, the writer spends absolutely no time dwelling on their faults, but instead, focuses exclusively on their faith. With regard to faults, a hush and silence falls. We have entered the hallowed halls of faith.


The faith of which heroes are made is not mere mental ascent to some fact. The faith of the people showcased in Hebrews 11 led them to act. You see names given, and you see faith mentioned, but it does not end there. Most of the words used by the writer describe the actions of these people. You cannot find one of the people listed that is cited merely because of mental agreement. Real faith moves people to act! The mental part is there, and cannot be excluded, but faith is so much more. To be precise, faith is not merely action, but you will never find faith that pleases God divorced from action. Real faith as portrayed in Hebrews 11 leads and motivates people to do things.


The faith of which heroes are made is not merely known by its actions as though by the busyness of many actions that we make ourselves people of faith. There is no action that is being prescribed or suggested for everyone. In fact, no two actions are identical. However, there is an unmistakable qualitative character to the multitude of actions referenced in Hebrews 11. Ordering a Big Mac at McDonald's is an action, but it represents a relatively small expenditure of resources and is usually driven more by convenience than high principles or a concern over one's long term health. Not so with heroes of faith – no “easy believism” for them. Virtually all of the actions given in Hebrews 11 involved personal sacrifice. The chapter is full of snippets telling of brave and bold actions that were motivated by their faith. The nature of the actions of people of faith is determined and resolute, based not on a short-term ease, but on eternal values and eternal goals. Those who are "looking forward to the city with foundations whose architect and builder is God" can be found performing sometimes outlandish actions that defy human explanation. (Hebrews 11:10 NIV)


It is easy for modern day Christians to miss the qualitative nature of the actions of faith as presented in the Bible. Faith is grievously trivialized if one makes the most basic of Christian actions the sole representations of faith. Please do not misunderstand -- there are basic actions involved with being a Christian, but real faith drives a life that takes risks knowing there is a greater good to be served -- and not only a greater good, but specifically a great God. I grow weary when the Biblical question, "What must I do to be saved?" is contorted into something like "Is that essential?" as though by clever theological slicing and dicing we can reduce being a Christian to an ever shorter and shorter list of "must do" items. What is really strange about this thinking is that it is usually presented as a way to emphasize faith. "Faith is all you need" is the often heard refrain as though faith were a magic potion that can be neatly placed in a bottle, capped, and placed on the shelf for safe keeping. To do so is to divorce faith from everything meaningful. To do so is to kill faith, for Scripture says, "Faith by itself, it if is not accompanied by action, is dead." (James 2:17 NIV) You do not see faith by itself in Hebrews 11. It is the forging of faith to actions of outstanding quality that gives faith its most honorable display.


The faith of which heroes are made is placed in God according to the Hebrew writer. There is no more significant point about faith. In our discussion of the intricacies of the operation of faith, we can easily miss or not give this point its prime place. Faith can be a very blind and unrewarding exercise if it is placed in the unstable and untrue. Faith has no virtue in and of itself. Its only value comes from the quality of the object of its affections. The God factor of faith cannot be overstated. Faith as described in Hebrews 11 gains all of its significance from the One in Whom it is placed. We all have trusted in people who turned out to disappoint us. We have even trusted ourselves and been disappointed. The key perhaps is not so much one of faith for most people have faith in something. It is not even the outstanding acts that may be done by faith. In our time, we witness with ever increasing frequency those who kill themselves based on a faith that leads them and their victims to an early demise while at the same time seeking to terrorize those left living into inaction or submission. God is mentioned specifically in most of the verses of the chapter, but He is seen in all of them. As surely as there are actions produced by faith, there is an energizing source to the faith that is given by the object of the affections of faith. The faith that moved people to act was placed in God.


The significance of the divine in our faith saturates everything the Hebrew writer says about faith, but it reaches its crescendo in Hebrews 12:1-2 when the writer pointedly personalizes to us the meaning of everything that he has already said and urges us to lock on to Jesus as the object of our faith.


"Therefore, since we are surrounded by such a great cloud of witnesses, let us throw off everything that hinders and the sin that so easy entangles, and let us fix our eyes on Jesus, the author and perfecter of our faith." (Hebrews 12:1-2 NIV)


Faith has a history. Because it has had a history, it has a present, and it will have a future. We must not find ourseles in the Hebrews 11 history lesson as half-asleep students ill prepared to grasp the truths of the lesson as though another boring teacher were droning on and on with but another dry rendition of history. It was not that the heroes he selected from the history of the Hebrew people were going to be the end of it all. No! There is a "we" and an "us" and an "our faith" to story. The story goes on. We – you and me -- are connected to this history! We have been given a rich legacy of faith which connects us to people of faith who were born before us and which ultimately connects us to God and His Son, Jesus Christ.


Our Faith Legacy

The panoramic view of faith history in Hebrews 11 along with a more personal view of faith history in the life of Timothy as described in Scripture naturally leads us to consider a more up close and personal view of our own legacy of faith. Of course, our personal legacy of faith will never replace the legacy described in Scripture, but for true believers they will be fully complimentary of each other.


As one grows older, one is likely drawn to one’s own heritage because one has had an ever growing span of life experiences upon which to reflect and certain of them begin to bubble to the top as much more significant than the others. Additionally, significant earthly relationships are severed in increasing numbers, as those that we consider close and valuable to our lives break free from the ever-increasing restrictions of human life to go to the life beyond the grave. This is when the heritage of faith often glows most brightly. Our “roots” are exactly that – roots. Spiritual roots give us an anchor of hope that we can follow in the footsteps of those who have gone before us. Many may no longer be here to take us by the hand, but the footsteps of their lives have left clear and indelible imprints that continue to help guide us onward in our continuing journey of faith. This is the true benefit of a legacy of faith. It comes from peole who in many cases have exited the scene of this earthly life, but it continues to give encouragement and guidance for today. The Proverb often quoted about child rearing says:


“Train a child in the way he should go, and when he is old he will not turn from it.” (Proverbs 22:6 NIV)


The contrast in this verse is between young (“a child”) and old. The training of yesterday helps guide today. It was not done merely in the present. Perhaps if a longer-term view of child training were taken, it would be done differently. It is not just to keep the peace today – although it can contribute significantly to that, but it is to give guidance for tomorrow. And that tomorrow will likely include the years after parents are gone. The past really is for today.


As I have pondered this historical characteristic of faith, I have reflected on those who have been added to the faith history since the writing of Hebrews. I have specifically been drawn to those in my own immediate spiritual heritage who are a part of my history of faith. Commencing with my own father’s death a few years ago and most recently with the passing of my father-in-law, my own spiritual roots have been given emphasis by their passing. No two men have had a greater influence on my life than those two men. In these two men is represented the man who gave me my first taste of faith and the man gave me my wife of faith. I have been richly blessed in that they were both men of faith.


Beyond these two men, I often think of a host of other people who have nurtured my faith. The legacy of faith given to me is indeed rich. The events even as a child still stand out in mind – the summer vacation Bible schools, the church camps, the revival meetings, the youth rallies, etc. There were also those people who nurtured my faith as a young adult when my faith was in its most precarious position. The list is quite lengthy of the names of people who have had an influence on my life. The legacy of faith is there. It has been there all along – even when I could not see it -- or perhaps more accurately, I failed to notice it. I suspect the same is true for many others.


As persons of faith, we owe a debt of gratitude to the carriers of faith that have brought it to us. God had indeed worked through history down to this present hour in which we occupy the stage of this earthly life. Legacy is a gift. We could not have earned it because we were not even around when much of it was being made, and even for the portion of it for which we were present generally had little to do with any active participation on our part. However, that has all changed now.


We are the recipients of a legacy of faith from those who have preceded us, but it is now our high privilege to become an integral part of this legacy for those who will succeed us on the timeline of history. The legacy of faith demonstrates its vitality as it marches onward into the future.


The Hebrew writer spoke poignantly of the living nature of a legacy of faith when he said of Abel (a man who had lived thousands of years before he wrote):


“And by faith he (Abel) still speaks, even though he is dead.” (Hebrews 11:4 NIV)


Think of it! A person dead for thousands of years, and he is still speaking! In fact, it is clear that the speaking after death may be more emphatic and influential than the sum of all the words spoken in a lifetime. To this point, the Scripture does not record a single word that Abel spoke, but the Scripture says, “He still speaks.” The voice of a life of faith lived in glory to God cannot be silenced by death for it speaks with a voice that does not need human organs of speech to speak. Our most significant speaking may also be done after our human lips cease to emit sounds. This ever-living characteristic is the special nature of a legacy of faith. Cherish it. Celebrate it. Pass it on.


Thursday, October 07, 2004

Church – Both Singular and Plural

I have several blogs about the church.If you have not already done so, I hope that you will read the earlier installments also, but I especially hope that you will read the first installment, “The Church – Connecting the Dots” and use it as the background material for the others.

I wrote earlier about using the visible/invisible terminology in reference to the church. One should not get the notion that the use of the visible/invisible terminology means that there are two different churches. There really are not. However, there are two perspectives, human and divine, of who composes the church as I discussed in an earlier article. Let me emphasize that from the perspective of Scripture, church is singular – there is only one. However, in Scriptures, church is also referred to in the plural. On the face of it, this may seem contradictory, but in fact, it is not. Again, the matter of perspective must be taken into account. The perspective involved here is similar to the one about the visible/invisible church that I referred to in an earlier writing, but it is not exactly the same. Both concepts, visible/invisible and singular/plural, are useful because they recognize primarily human limitations. There is nothing wrong with that. God created us, and He knows our limitations, so it would be understandable that Scripture would sometimes focus on subjects using our human vantage point. However, it is also true that at a conceptual level, we can ascertain things that are beyond the five physical senses of sight, sound, smell, taste, and touch. So, it would also make sense that grand concepts would be explained in Scripture where our imagination must be exercised to grasp them. I believe the church is one such concept. Scripture speaks of a “glorious church” (Ephesians 5:27 KJV),so it should not come as a surprise that our imaginations would be placed in high gear as we learn about it from Scripture. So, get ready to put your imaginations in high gear! But let’s start slow and work our way up to that. J

In Scripture, church is sometimes used in the plural form. In those cases, it generally reflects a perspective that recognizes a human limitation.

Limitations of Space (Geography)

Perhaps the most obvious distinctive mentioned in Scripture about the church is that of place. In fact, in the majority of cases where we see the word “churches” (plural) in Scripture, it is referring to groupings of individual churches or congregations. A typical example of this usage is:
"The churches in the province of Asia send you greetings. Aquila and Priscilla greet you warmly in the Lord, and so does the church that meets at their house.” (1 Corinthians 16:19 NIV)

Notice also that the same verse contains a reference in the singular to “the church that meets at their house.” Even when the word is used in the singular, it often is referring to a church in a specific place.

Undoubtedly, this terminology is common in the New Testament because most of the history that we know of the church in the New Testament relates to the evangelistic or missionary journeys of one known as the Apostle Paul. The Book of Acts is a book of history that records those journeys in which he established and nurtured the churches that he was instrumental in establishing. A large portion of the New Testament comes under a grouping called “epistles.” These were documents composed by the Apostle Paul that were sent to these churches. The concept of church is central to these New Testament books. In the limitations of space, there has been significant blood, sweat, and tears expended to place churches in many places.

These churches also were by no means monolithic. They had different strengths and weaknesses. They were composed of different people. Different letters contains different topics because they were tailored for a specific audience. The point to note here is that much diversity, both good and not so good, exists across the churches. It was so in New Testament times. It is so in our day. This is evident in the writing of the Apostle John in recording the letters to “the seven churches” in the book of Revelation. (Revelation 1:4, 11, 20) He then proceeds to issue letters to each of the seven churches beginning his writing, “to the angel of the church in Ephesus.” (Revelation 2:1) He continues writing to each of the seven churches -- not one is left out in his writing. Each one is different. There are things commendable and things not commendable in these churches, but the characteristics described are different for every single one of them. Their diversity is seen in that a different letter with different contents was written for each church. So as we view the churches of our day, we should not expect them to be the same. If anything, we should expect them to be different. These churches were different and distinct, but they also were collectively a part of the church in its singularity. There is really only one church, but there is also a perspective in which it is plural.

Limitations of Time (History)

The limitation of time is not nearly as pronounced in Scripture since the history recorded in Scripture of the church covers relatively few years. There is an entire field of study now that is devoted to the study of the history of the church. We are rapidly approaching the 2,000-year mark since the beginning of the Christian church recorded in the Bible. The church now exists through the world (wide space), but it now has existed throughout many years (long time).

Those who have lived for several decades perhaps have a better sense of this. We do a disservice to the global concept of church if we assume that all churches are like the one we attend. It is obviously easier for us to comprehend that there is geographical diversity. I sense that it is not so easy to grasp the chronological diversity of the church. With the benefit of modern transportation, I can board an airplane and be in a church meeting on the other side of the world in a matter of a few hours. However, it is not so easy to transport myself back in time to what church life must have been like in the first century during New Testament times. It is difficult to imagine attending church in the time of Martin Luther. For that matter, it is somewhat difficult to imagine attending a church in early colonial America. If the truth were known, it is somewhat difficult for our children to imagine attending a church like the small one that we attended in a rural community when we were children.

While recognizing the singularity of the church, we miss much of the grandeur of the church if we miss the plurality of the church. We often think that everyone thinks and behaves like us – or at least, they should. However, this is unrealistic and obviously not true. In the great oneness of the church, there is also vast diversity. If we are not careful, we can miss the beauty of this aspect of church plurality of space and time. Please understand that I am not attempting to sanctify every custom or practice that has ever been done in the church, but I hope that my readers will not attempt to condemn or put down every custom or practice that has ever been done in the church that does not exactly match the ones with which they are most familiar. I am amazed how tradition often takes on almost the level of Biblical doctrine. For example, church as I knew it as a child consisted of two hours on Sunday morning, an hour and a half on Sunday night, and about an hour and a half on Wednesday night. The structure of those meetings was quite monolithic in our groups of churches. For example, Wednesday night was primarily a “prayer meeting.” There was usually some singing and a Bible study time, but it always included a time when everyone was encouraged to offer audible prayers to God. We never did that on Sunday morning or Sunday night. No one ever questioned the basic structure of our church meetings, and for certain, no one questioned the origin of the tri-weekly meetings; but the methodology that I have just described was elevated to a very high plane. Oh sure, there was minor tweaking of the structure of the meetings, but nothing substantial was ever done to permanently change it. It was important that we attend all three of the weekly meetings. It was also important when traveling to arrange our travels to be certain that we still attended at least three weekly meetings of the church. To miss any of the three weekly meetings was considered a major offense, and if done with any regularity, could elicit visits from the church leaders to strongly urge a greater level of faithfulness. Where did this form of carrying out the ministry of the church come from? I really don’t know, and I have never been able to obtain a good answer to the question. In fact, to ask the question is to invite some strange looks and to potentially have your Christian commitment called into question in churches where the tri-weekly meeting model has been the norm for many years. I see no benefit in knocking the model, and that is not my intention here, but the point is that it was an invention at a point in the history of the church. It is evidence of the chronological diversity of the church.

Church music has evolved a great deal in my lifetime. The church where I now attend talks about having a “blended service,” which means that there is an intermingling of some of the old hymns of the church along with the new worship choruses. I have witnessed chronic complaints about changes in music in the modern church. In most cases, my sense is that the arguments about church music are driven primarily by preferential desires of music styles rather than substantive doctrinal points. Again, I believe it is primarily evidence of the chronological diversity of the church. If history tells us anything, it is that the church has a very diverse history. While all diversity is not good, there is obviously the truth that God has woven a real patchwork quilt together throughout time and space that demonstrates the plurality of the singular church.

There is a grand beauty in viewing the plurality of the singular church. We also fail to appreciate the real singularity of the church if we do not grab hold of the principle of the wide expanse of God’s church with respect to both space and time. It is without a doubt the most dramatic demonstration of “E Pluribus Unum” (out of many, one) slogan that we have on our coinage in America. America may indeed be an amazing melting pot of people who have immigrated to it from all over the earth, but that is nothing like the melting pot of God’s church. Think of it. There are no limitations. It includes all the saints of every kindred, tribe, and nation of all the ages!

With regard to chronological plurality or diversity of the church, consider the grandness of this Biblical description:

“Now to him who is able to do immeasurably more than all we ask or imagine, according to his power that is at work within us, to him be glory in the church and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations, for ever and ever! Amen.”(Ephesians 3:20-21 NIV)

With regard to the special plurality or diversity of the church, consider the grandness of this Biblical description that is taken from John’s picture of the throne room of God where the following words are being sung:

“…you purchased men for God from every tribe and language and people and nation.” (Revelation 5:9b NIV)

One church composed of those from “every tribe and language and people and nation” from “all generations.” Think of it – by being a part of God’s church in the church in your city of your country, you become a part of the global church of all of the ages of time. That is an amazing case of a plurality in singularity. That is indeed the “glorious church” spoken of in Scripture in which God has given us an opportunity to participate.


Friday, August 13, 2004

The Church – What We Can See Versus What We Cannot See

I have several blogs about the church.If you have not already done so, I hope that you will read the earlier installments also, but I especially hope that you will read the first installment, “The Church – Connecting the Dots” and use it as the background material for the others.

In my last writing, I pointed out that it is helpful for all of us to remember that the church on earth that we see is a mix of divine elements that are perfect and human elements that are imperfect. Another element that can be helpful in understanding the church and accepting it for what it is, is to recognize that there is a “visible church” that we see with our eyes and experience with our other human faculties, but that there is also an “invisible church” in the sense that we cannot determine fully with our limited human abilities.

I did not originate the terminology of the “visible church” and “invisible church,” but I think it can be helpful to distinguish between what we are able to see and distinguish with our own perception, and what we are unable to see and distinguish. I also want to be clear that I am not conveying this visible/invisible distinction as a principle of Scripture. Please know that this distinction is not an explicit Bible doctrine. However, concepts are not necessarily anti-Biblical because they are non-Biblical. I believe that is the case here. The concept conveys a truth about perspectives. It recognizes the limitations of human perspectives. It also honors God’s perspective. After all, the divine perspective is the perspective that really matters. However, for now, we live with the limitations of our human perspectives. We deny reality if we deny that these two perspectives exist. We also deny reality if we do not realize that these perspectives may be different. In fact, it should be expected that they will be different, considering the significant differences that exist between our limited understanding and God’s full understanding. In some cases, these different perspectives may be caused by evil intent by those who may choose to ignore what can be known from Scripture, but often, the differences are caused by no evil intent. They are the natural consequence of our human understanding being limited from knowing everything that there is to know. I want to elaborate on the visible/invisible church concept as another way of understanding the church.

The Nature of the Boundaries

It is vital that we understand the nature of the boundaries of the church. By boundaries, I mean the determination of the church’s constituency. This involves determining who is a member of it and who is not. Understanding the nature of the boundaries can be more critical to having a proper understanding and appreciation for the church than the knowing of the exact boundaries themselves. Any human that professes to know the exact boundaries is assuming far too much about their own knowledge and abilities. There is One Who knows with utmost precision the boundaries. That knowledge resides with the One Who is building the church, Jesus Christ Himself. These boundaries are nonetheless real. Simply because we cannot see them or determine them with complete accuracy does not mean that they do no exist. Hence, the term “the invisible church” has been coined to refer to the church as it is determined by the Founder and Builder Himself, Jesus Christ. Again, we are talking a matter of perspective. The term “the visible church” has been coined to refer to the church as we see it to be through the eyes of our limited understanding. This difference in perspective is gigantic.

It Is Wise to Recognize Limitations

We are wisest when we realize our limitations and His limitlessness. “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.” (Proverbs 1:7) Did you get that? What’s God got to do with being wise? Well, not a whole lot unless there are dramatic differences between Him and us. Our youngest son when he was about seven years old was seeking to emphasize the enormity of something, and he invented the word “hugantic.” As he began to use the word, his friends began using the word also. As he began to use the word with greater frequency, my wife decided that the she needed to explain to him that it was really not a word. He explained that it must surely be a word because all of his friends were using it! Well, I recently checked again, and it is still not in the dictionary; but if it were, this would be a good place to use it. The difference between our perspective and God’s perspective is dramatic. It is huge and gigantic -- yes, “hugantic!”

God is the Ultimate Boundary Determiner

Several years ago a friend of mine produced a list of preachers with names and addresses of those in our small group of churches. He was careful to point out in the front of the book that his book was not to be confused with the Lamb’s book of life mentioned in Scripture. Why did he choose to do that? It was because any such book of lists necessarily makes a tacit judgment of who is in the church and who is not, and he wanted to make perfectly clear that his purpose in creating the book was utilitarian only to provide contact information of church leaders and not a statement – at least not in any final sense – of who were true preachers in God’s church. The ultimate determination about church’s constituency is God’s. However, His final determination is not fully known to any of us. Hence, the term “invisible church” is used to refer to the constituency of the church as it will be finally and completely determined by none other than God Himself.

Human Determinations of the Boundaries of the Church

There are numerous ways that human determinations are made about who is in the church and who is not. This process can take several forms from the simple presumption that someone is a church member by activities that they are observed doing (e.g., going to church meetings every Sunday) to a person’s name being listed in an official membership roll of a specific church in a particular place. So whether a very informal assessment of a person’s church membership or a formal verification of a person’s church membership or any process in between, there is something visible whereby a determination is made about church membership. At least that is true when a human being is making the determination.

So, when I speak of the visible church, I am speaking of some process that is understood and observable by a human being whereby a conclusion is reached about a person’s involvement in the church. Now for the purists who are reading this, hold your guns about the accuracy of such a conclusion. I am not arguing for the infallibility of such a conclusion, I am only illustrating that these conclusions are reached on a regular basis and visible church life proceeds based on these conclusions. Some are very formal processes; some are quite informal, but they exist nevertheless and are utilized to determine who is in the various manifestations of the visible church. These processes are also quite varied. In observing these processes, we can know that the decision of who is a member of a local visible church is not done directly by God. It is a human judgment based on church policies and procedures that have been established by humans. From a human perspective, people can be -- and sometimes are -- included or excluded from the church based on a willful disregard for truths that we do know from Scripture. However, it is also possible that errors could be made that are not based on a willful disregard for truth, but simply on our inability to know completely. The secrets of the human heart and the ways of God are not things that we can know fully. Now it would be much easier if the ones that God determines are in the church would be exactly matched by the group that we see granted church membership in all the visible churches, but this would require all makers and implementers of church membership policies to be like God. Since no one is like God, it is impossibility. If there is anything that is proven by the wide variations in church membership policies and procedures, it is that no man or group of men is like God. Human perceptions are by their intrinsic nature limited. We are not only limited in our moral perfection, we are also limited in our abilities. We are not like God in either the moral department or in the ability-to-know department. However, for the Christian, we do not need to know all in order to know that there is One Who does know all.

Normal and Right for Visible Boundaries to be Made

At this point, someone may be tempted to say, “Well then, let’s forget about making any visible boundaries and ignore any that church leaders make since they are flawed anyway.” However, while recognizing the limitations of the visible boundaries of the church, we must also realize their value. In other words, there is some significance to the boundaries men draw in defining the church. The process of making boundaries is vital to any organization with a need for membership definition. This process is also in evidence in Scripture when the process of excluding someone from the fellowship of the church is mentioned. (See 1 Corinthians 5:1-12) Church leaders make the visible boundaries that we can observe, and in so doing, they are fulfilling a leadership role typical of any organization, and they are specifically following Biblical guidelines that indicate such a function should be performed. In fact, when membership boundaries are wisely set according to principles of Scripture, God is honored by the diligent effort, in that it recognizes that there are boundaries that have ultimately been made by God Himself.

The Relationship Between the Visible and Invisible Church

Even though the visible and invisible boundaries of the church are not identical, they are nonetheless related. At least, they should be related to each other if those responsible for making the boundaries are focused on guiding the church based upon the wealth of information that has been given to us by God in Scripture. It is not as though we are left totally in the dark about how to be in God’s church. We can know enough to place ourselves within the boundaries of the invisible church. In so doing, that will place us inside of a visible church somewhere. The concept of a Christian without an attachment to visible church is foreign to Scripture and common sense. This means that there is a significant amount of overlap between the visible and invisible church, but they are not exactly the same thing. It should be apparent to most that simply having your name on the roll of some visible church does not necessarily equate to being a part of the church in God’s eyes. However, there is -- or at least ought to be – a close relationship between the visible and invisible church, but they are not exactly the same.

The Lamb’s Book of Life – the Ultimate List

Above all, we must constantly be cognizant of Who ultimately determines who is in and who is out. It is no accident that the existence of earthly church membership listings is nowhere mentioned in Scripture. It is of considerable note that there is a list mentioned in Scripture, but it is not a listing that any human has initiated or maintains. In a picture of heaven given in Scripture by the Apostle John, he indicates that there is a listing of those who are part of the “in group.” This “in group” is composed of “only those whose names are written in the Lamb’s book of life.” (Revelation 21:27 NIV) This “book of life” terminology used in Scripture is interesting. The term is used a number of times in Scripture, and the words “in” and “out” are typically used with it. Great blessings go to those whose names are in it, and great curses go to those whose names are not in it. So, it is a very important book. With regard to this book, there is a gospel song that queries, “Is my name written there?” That is an important question to ask considering the importance given to this book in the record of Scripture. So, the evidence is pretty clear that there is a heavenly listing of who is part of the “in group.” The evidence is also common that individual churches maintain lists of their members. Larger churches in recent years have produced “pictorial directories” of their “church members” to aid in being able to identify people. We need to understand the relationship between these visible church membership listings and the Lamb’s book of life. The membership listings created by man in an organizational structure have a purpose and place, but they are based on generalities and developed using limited and varying criteria. The listing in the Lamb’s book of life is the one that is based on the knowledge of God Himself, and it is the one that ultimately counts. There is ultimately only One Judge of all mankind, and none of us are He.

We do know enough from Scripture to be a part of God’s church. That knowledge from Scripture has universally led people across the ages of history and in widely varied cultures to be part of a visible manifestation of the church somewhere on the face of the earth. We are not unique in that we may sometimes struggle to make sense of the visible church in its varied forms on this earth, but don’t loose heart, there is a church that is determined ultimately by God Himself. It is His church, His body, His bride. Know that He has determined to use it as His instrument to make Himself known to the peoples of the earth and bring glory to Himself. Don’t miss the opportunity to be a part of the invisible church by your involvement in a visible church as we all await the final revelation of His church.

“To him be glory in the church
and in Christ Jesus throughout all generations,
for ever and ever!
Amen.
(Ephesians 3:21 NIV)



Next 5 >>