letters from kamp krustyThey take their funnel cakes a lot more seriously in Knoxville.
branthansen
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit branthansen's Xanga Site!

Name: Brant
State: Florida


Expertise: Matters cultural, plus toast.


Message: message meEmail: email me


Member Since: 7/20/2003

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
ROFTERS
previous - random - next

* * ! RELEVANT ! * *
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site

Thursday, July 13, 2006

Moving to a New Blog Site

 

I just moved to a new blog site. 

http://branthansen.typepad.com/

Please bookmark it or something.  I'm stil learning it, and I posted a few post-things.

Something freaky about blogging, just so you know:   I was thinking I had -- literally -- 10, maybe 15 readers.  I have a lot more.  Freaked me out.  Xanga recently started letting blog-owners look at stats and stuff.  

I do radio for a living, so I'm actually not interested in having another medium wherein people can vote on whether they like me.  But it's still nice to make friends and learn stuff.

In radio, they tell you that less than 1% of your listenership will call the show.  That's certainly true.  I think the ratio's higher for blog readers-to-commenters, but not much. 

Anyway, now that I know I have more readers than I thought, let me make you a solemn promise: 

I promise I will still have no point for this blog.  I promise to continue to bring you the very same level of lack-of-excellence that I have provided right here.  But I'll be here, instead of at this page, not providing incisive commentary, and not providing lively writing that just makes you smile.

For the latest insight on the Israeli/Hezbollah conflict, be sure to not go to my new blogsite.  For amusing observational humor, just don't swing on by to my new blogsite.  And for theological commentary that leaves you enriched, make sure to avoid my new blogsite.  I'm just a click away!  It's all not right there.

Thank you.


Monday, July 10, 2006

I'm Not Totally Comfortable With This Yet

I'm kinda scared to go to France.

I'm just not...comfortable...with some things, culturally.  I don't know.  I just feel like, sometimes, I don't understand.

I'm not going to judge a culture, or push my morality off on anyone, certainly.  I'm just saying I was watching this soccer game, and...I don't know.  Like I say, I can't judge.  I wasn't raised in France, and I haven't walked a kilometre in their cleats.

Granted, I don't, generally, tend to attack people's sterna with my skull.  But, before we accuse and condemn, think about it:  Who among us, really, hasn't head-butted someone in the sternum during a World Cup final?  So let's hold our fire.

It's a classic case of a clash of cultures.  But I will grow.  I will seek to understand, to learn.


Pursuing Truth About Nature -- But Only So Far

A warning about this interview right here: 

If you want to persist in the idea that Intelligent Design is just warmed-over creationism, or that its adherents are dolts, or that "real science" makes a mockery of it,  or that it doesn't pose a fascinating scientific question -- don't listen to it with an open mind.

I've had a chance to talk with William Dembski a few times, and I've also, on several occasions, debated/interviewed reps with the people behind this magazine, which represents the opposing view.  I'm sympathetic to both, strangely, because I think Dembski is brilliant, and I'm every bit as skeptical -- moreso, actually -- than the people behind Skeptic.

(I should note that personally, I am -- putting it gently -- not a fan of the creationist leaders whom Dembski mentions here who are attacking his views.  I think they've done, and continue to do, much damage.  That's another post.)

Whatever you think of the debate, I.D. is hardly the argument of yokels, despite op-ed writers' attempts to press I.D. into their usual self-affirming narratives.  And Sherer himself says I.D. has a place in science classroom discussion.

The debate may not change your mind.  After all, if you've defined science to include design that might be from aliens from outer space, but to exclude design by a Designer -- well, the question is certainly decided, then and there.  Case closed.

By this definition, of course, you've also effectively said, "If the truth about nature is otherwise -- outside my definition of science -- then I will not scientifically learn from this truth about nature, however beneficial it might be to our understanding."  -- an unseemly sort of thing, I would think, for one with an open mind. 

Dembski rightly notes that I.D. principles are already widely-used in pursuits like forensics, archaeology, and the SETI program.  His worthy opponent, Michael Sherer, notes that he, Shermer, would entertain the idea -- and scientists do, frustrated to account for design, here -- that aliens from outer space may have designed life on earth.  But, he says, we cannot consider the possibility of this different kind of extra-terrestrial intelligence. 

And we mustn't allow that possibility -- in the interest of an open mind, you understand.

Again, Chesterton:  Odd that one is said to be closed-minded for allowing that miracles are possible, while the "free-thinker" has decided, without proof, that they are not.


Saturday, July 08, 2006

Wide World of Shorts

So my flag football team made a good play in the last game!  We picked up about fifteen yards!  Something worked! We exclaimed from the sideline!  Our play was a success!  High-five with my assistant coach!  Yesssss!

Wait -- a flag on the field.

Penalty on us.  Illegal Shorts.  Loss of down.

Of course.  Illegal Shorts.  I'd told everyone at the beginning of the year, no pockets.  You can't have pocket-shorts in flag football.  But our receiver on the play had pocket-shorts.

Wait.  It's not just him.  It's our other receiver, too.  And our quarterback.  And our cornerbacks.  Half the team had Illegal Shorts.  They'd all bought new black shorts to match our black uniforms.  We looked sharp, marching back to our own goal-line.

So I called timeout and -- I'm sure Lombardi did this, too -- went through the crowd, asking individuals for their shorts.  "Can I have your shorts?"  "Hey, can I see your shorts? -- can I have those?"  "Can you swap shorts with my backfield?"

We found some shorts, turned others inside out, and cobbled together a team, just in time to be beaten 20 to nothing.

I'm now 1 -17 lifetime as a coach.  Pray for us.


Thursday, July 06, 2006

A Man Named Knofel

A man named "Knofel" says he's been wrong, all these years, about a divisive issue in the church:  women in leadership.

Whatever you think of his conclusion, please allow these remarkable things to sink in:

1)  This guy's name is "Knofel", and

2)  He's in his 70's, and has made teaching doctrine -- while taking the Bible very seriously -- his life.  And he's not only willing change his mind, he's allowing a much-younger woman (!) to inform his thinking, even mentor him in this area. 

Like I say:  Right or wrong, that's impressive, and possibly costly, one presumes, in his circle.

Below is my friend Don's column from the Champaign-Urbana News-Gazette, a fine paper I used to write for as well.  I post without permission, in hopes that an ensuing lawsuit will allow me to spend more time with Don.

Don Follis 7/7/06 "Conservative scholar changes mind about women in church leadership"

When I 20 years old, I encountered a young scholar named Knofel Staton.   Staton came to speak at the little Christian college where I was studying.   Staton was raised in the Independent Christian church/Church of Christ denomination just like I was.   The Bible was highly respected in my denomination, and Staton could make the Bible come alive as no one I had ever heard. I once drove 200 hundred miles to hear him speak at a conference.

A few years later I came to Illinois and Staton moved from where he was teaching in Missouri to California , where he has been a New Testament professor for 25 years.   I have read many of Staton's 35 books, but I encountered his name a couple of years ago in a different vein.  

Reading Sarah Sumner's "Men and Women in the Church," (InterVarsity Press, 2003), I discovered that she thanks Staton in the acknowledgments for reading her manuscript in its early versions.

Sumner, a Ph.D. in systematic theology from Trinity Evangelical Divinity School near Chicago, argues that women should be released to use whatever gift God gives them, including preaching, teaching and leading in churches.   Properly understood, Sumner believes the Bible allows this.

Like Sumner and like Staton, I grew up in a church where women did not take leading roles.   They did not preach, serve as key church leaders, or usher guests to their seats.   However, women did serve as my Sunday School teachers and Virginia Beamer was the best teacher I ever had.   She brought life to the Bible stories.

A few weeks ago I discovered that Knofel Staton, now in his mid-70s, has written a book on women in leadership in the church.   In 2003 Wipf and Stock Publishers published Staton's "The Biblical Liberation of Women for Leadership in the church."

Turns out, Staton's book is a revised edition of his doctoral dissertation from Haggard School of Theology at Azusa Pacific University, which is just down the road from Hope International University where Staton teaches.

At about 70 years old, Staton went back to school.  That's impressive.  But then he decided to write his dissertation on women leadership in the church.   That's noteworthy, given Staton's high respect and influential voice within the Christian Church/Church of Christ denomination.   In the acknowledgements of his book, Staton thanks Dr. Sarah Sumner, 30 years his junior but now his doctoral mentor.   He praises her for her holistic understanding of the women in leadership, saying that she has been consistently and significantly helpful.  

Staton held a traditional view on women in church leadership for more than 40 years.   Based on his views of Scripture, he did not believe that women could be principal preachers, teachers or leaders in the church.   But after seriously studying the matter, Staton changed his mind.   The thesis of his book is that although women are restricted from leadership roles in many churches, it is God's intention for them to be included along with men.

While his careful study of Scripture is the main reason he changed his mind, Staton says there were other contributing factors.   For one, he saw an increasing number of inconsistencies that prohibited women leaders in congregations while allowing them other significant leadership roles, such as writing Biblical commentaries used by men.

Moreover, Staton regularly had occasion to see gifted women in teaching and preaching roles, and he began developing a "growing perspective that the Bible does not prohibit women from teaching/preaching or holding other leadership roles."

The liberation of women is demonstrated by God's intention in creation, Staton writes.   He argues that God put His Spirit in the first created persons.   The first male and female were given the same initial service responsibilities on earth without gender differentiation.

Throughout Jesus' life, Staton believes He modeled how it was God's intention for women to be liberated from what was often a second-class citizenship.   Furthermore, the early church includes both male and female leaders.  Most impressive, perhaps, is Staton's challenge to the reader to understand in proper context the meaning of headship and the two biblical passages (I Corinthians 14:34-35 and I Timothy 2:9-15) most often used to prohibit women from leading in the church.

When you look at the whole of Scripture, Staton says you find the Bible siding equally with men and women as leaders in the church.   Staton's church, Crossroads Christian Church in Covina, California, is a leading church in the Christian Church/Church of Christ association.  Crossroads includes women pastors and women elders in their leadership structure.

When a denomination's respected scholar and prolific writer changes his mind on an issue, it is worthy of note.   When a man of 70 continues to study and change his mind, it is an example to follow.

Don Follis is a pastor at the Vineyard Church in Urbana.  His column appears on Fridays.  Copyright 2006 by the Champaign-Urbana News-Gazette, Champaign, Ill.



Next 5 >>