FUNNY GAMES: A first impressionTake everything you know and understand about humans and their
relationship with violence in entertainment. Take it and look at it.
Take it and step away from it. Take everything you know about movies.
Take it and look at it and try and step as far away from it as
possible.
This movie was made to be seen with large groups of people…like in a
theater. The idiots along with the geniuses are supposed to share the
same experience in the same theater. It’s a film that goes beyond the
screen. It’s a film that does what it’s supposed to do. Before you
enter the theater you need to pay attention. You have to see how people
respond during the film and you have to pay attention to how they
respond after it’s over while everyone is walking out the door.
When I went to see this film, people got up and left. Some people
laughed. Some people sighed and whispered to their friend. And almost
everyone was squirming in their seats.
Funny Games is there to assault its audience. It exists to
fuck you in your presumptuous face. It breaks the 4th wall in the
traditional ways and it does it in a way that I’ve never seen before.
You’ll be let down and let down and let down and you deserve every
second of that disappointment.
In one scene, we’re forced to watch a NASCAR race on a television
with a fresh coat of blood splatter for an ungodly amount of time and I
loved every minute of it. And other scenes are static for minutes upon
minutes with no cuts. The film tortures us with our own preconceived
ideas of how violence should be played out on the big screen. The pace,
the composition, presentation of tits and ass, the killer’s motivation,
the lack of swelling orchestra to let the audience know what’s about to
happen…all of those things have been twisted and/or thrown out
completely.
The violence is carried out off screen. This is not a gory film. You
make the gore. Are you pissed that you don’t see people being murdered
or tortured? Great! That’s perfect! You’ve said so much about yourself.
The director has proven his point.
There are so many layers to this film that it requires re-watching.
There are so many things that can be looked at and put together to make
this a truly great American film…
Which it wasn’t the first time around. It was an Austrian film. Funny Games
2008 is a shot by shot remake of the 1997 version only now the film is
in English with a new cast. Why would a director want to do this?
Ask him. But I think it has something to do with the fact that his
first attempt in 1997 didn’t quite reach everyone. More importantly, it
didn’t quite reach America with full force. I think, in my opinion, the
director, Michael Hanek, thought it was crucial that he get an American
response; what with all that’s been happening in the past 10 years or
more. Funny Games addresses so many important American assumptions in violence and filmmaking. It’s in the same place as Blue Velvet.
It’s very American. Oh, and by the way, if a director wants to remake
his own fucking movie, don’t give him shit. It’s his movie. Fuck you.
This movie will thrive on both positive and negative reviews because
from both sides of reception we’ll learn something; whether about the
reviewer/critic, the art of filmmaking, or ourselves. That’s what a
movie is supposed to do. If you don’t want to fight about a movie’s
integrity or meaning then go watch fucking Witless Protection.
P.S. Always remember to suspend your disbelief.
P.P.S. Always remember movies are pretentious by nature.
|
Don't watch Witless Protection.
Watch Shoot 'Em Up! With Clive Owen!
Trust me, even those who hate violent movies should give that one at least a decent shot.
<TR UNSELECTABLE="on" hb_tag="1"> <TD style="FONT-SIZE: 1pt" height=1 UNSELECTABLE="on">