|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| California Senate Votes to Allow GPS on Windshield California lawmakers vote to stop police from ticketing motorists for using windshield-mounted GPS units.
The
California state Senate voted 38-1 last Thursday to legalize the use of
portable GPS navigation units in automobiles. Under current law, police
can pull over and ticket motorists who have anything mounted on the
windshield not authorized by the state. GPS-using motorists stung by
expensive "obstructed view" citations are often unaware that using a
device specifically designed for in-car use could be illegal. To date,
California has only carved out exemptions for the use of window tint,
toll road transponders and stickers used to remind motorists of an
upcoming oil change.
Senate Bill 1567 would add an exemption
for the use of a seven-inch GPS screen mounted on in the lower corner
of the passenger-side windshield or a five-inch screen on the driver's
side. According to the bill, the device may be installed, "if the
system is used only for door-to-door navigation while the motor vehicle
is being operated and outside of an airbag deployment zone." | | |
| Forecast: Big quake likely in Calif.
LOS ANGELES - California
faces an almost certain risk of being rocked by a strong earthquake by
2037, scientists said Monday in the first statewide temblor forecast. New
calculations reveal there is a 99.7 percent chance a magnitude 6.7
quake or larger will strike in the next 30 years. The odds of such an
event are higher in Southern California than Northern California, 97
percent versus 93 percent.
"It basically guarantees it's going to happen," said Ned Field, a geophysicist with the U.S. Geological Survey in Pasadena and lead author of the report.
The 1994 Northridge earthquake under Los Angeles'
San Fernando Valley was magnitude 6.7. It killed 72 people, injured
more than 9,000 and caused $25 billion in damage in the metropolitan
area.
The damage created by an earthquake depends greatly on where it hits. A 7.1 quake — much stronger than Northridge — hit the Mojave Desert in 1999 but caused only a few injuries and no deaths.
California is one of the world's most seismically active regions.
More than 300 faults crisscross the state, which sits atop two of
Earth's major tectonic plates, the Pacific and North American plates.
About 10,000 quakes each year rattle Southern California alone,
although most of them are too small to be felt.
The analysis is the first comprehensive effort by the USGS, Southern California Earthquake Center and California Geological Survey
to calculate earthquake probabilities for the entire state using newly
available data. Previous quake probabilities focused on specific
regions and used various methodologies that made it difficult to
compare.
For example, a 2003 report found the San Francisco Bay Area
faced a 62 percent chance of being struck by a magnitude 6.7 quake by
2032. The new study increased the likelihood slightly to 63 percent by
2037. For the Los Angeles Basin, the probability is higher at 67
percent. There is no past comparison for the Los Angeles area.
Scientists still cannot predict exactly where in the state such a
quake will occur or when. But they say the analysis should be a wake-up
call for residents to prepare for a natural disaster in earthquake
country.
Knowing the likelihood of a strong earthquake is the first step in
allowing scientists to draw up hazard maps that show the potential
severity of ground shaking in an area. The information can also help
with updating building codes and emergency plans and setting earthquake insurance rates.
"A big earthquake can happen tomorrow or it can happen 10 years from
now," said Tom Jordan, director of the earthquake center, which is
headquartered at the University of Southern California.
Researchers also calculated the statewide probabilities for larger
temblors over the same time period. Among their findings: There is a 94
percent chance of a magnitude 7 shock or larger; a 46 percent chance of
a magnitude 7.5 and a 4.5 percent chance of a magnitude 8.
The odds are higher that a magnitude 7.5 quake will hit Southern California than Northern California — 37 percent versus 15 percent.
Of all the faults in the state, the southern San Andreas, which runs from Parkfield in central California southeast to the Salton Sea,
appears most primed to break, scientists found. There is a 59 percent
chance in the next three decades that a Northridge-size quake will
occur on the fault compared to 21 percent for the northern section.
The northern San Andreas produced the 1906 San Francisco earthquake, but the southernmost segment has not popped in more than three centuries.
Scientists are also concerned about the Hayward and San Jacinto
faults, which have a 31 percent chance of producing a Northridge-size
temblor in the next 30 years. The Hayward fault runs through densely
populated cities in the San Francisco Bay Area. The San Jacinto fault bisects the fast-growing city of San Bernardino east of Los Angeles. | | |
| Why Beautiful Women Marry Less Attractive Men? Women seeking a lifelong mate might do well to choose the guy a
notch below them in the looks category. New research reveals couples in
which the wife is better looking than her husband are more positive and
supportive than other match-ups. The reason, researchers suspect, is that men place great value on beauty, whereas women are more interested in having a supportive husband.
Researchers admit that looks are subjective, but studies show there
are some universal standards, including large eyes, "baby face"
features, symmetric faces, so-called average faces, and specific waist-hip ratios in men versus women.
Past research has shown that individuals with comparable stunning
looks are attracted to each other and once they hook up they report
greater relationship satisfaction. These studies, however, are mainly
based on new couples, showing that absolute beauty is important in the
earliest stages of couple-hood, said lead researcher James McNulty of
the University of Tennessee. But the role of physical attractiveness in well-established partnerships, such as marriage, is somewhat of a mystery.
The new study, published in the February issue of the Journal of
Family Psychology, reveals looks continue to matter beyond that initial
attraction, though in a different way.
Supportive spouses
McNulty's team assessed 82 couples who had married within the
previous six months and had been together for nearly three years prior
to tying the knot. Participants were on average in their early to mid-20s.
Researchers videotaped as each spouse discussed with their partner a
personal problem for 10 minutes. The tapes were analyzed for whether
partners were supportive of spouses' issues, which included goals to
eat healthier, to land a new job and to exercise more often.
"A negative husband would've said, 'This is your problem, you deal
with it,'" McNulty said, "versus 'Hey, I'm here for you; what do you
want me to do?; how can I help you?'"
A group of trained "coders" rated the facial attractiveness
of each spouse on a scale from 1 to 10, with the perfect 10
representing the ultimate babe. About a third of the couples had a more
attractive wife, a third a more attractive husband and the remaining
partners showed matching looks.
Trophy wives
Overall, wives and husbands behaved more positively when the woman was better looking.
The finding "seems very reasonable," said Dan Ariely, a professor of
behavioral economics at MIT's Program in Media Arts and Sciences and
Sloan School of Management. "Men are very sensitive to women's
attractiveness. Women seem to be sensitive to men's height and salary,"
said Ariely, who was not involved in the recent study.
In couples with more attractive husbands, both partners were less supportive of one another. McNulty suggests wives mirror, in some ways, the level of support they get from husbands.
"The husband who's less physically attractive than his wife is
getting something more than maybe he can expect to get," McNulty told LiveScience. "He's getting something better than he's providing at that level. So he's going to work hard to maintain that relationship."
Men who are more attractive than their partners would theoretically
have access to partners who are more attractive than their current
spouses, McNulty said. The "grass could be greener" mentality could
make these men less satisfied and less committed to maintain the
marriage.
Physical attractiveness of husbands is not as important to women,
the researchers suggest. Rather, wives are looking for supportive
husbands, they say.
So it seems the mismatch in looks is actually a perfect match.
"Equitable is unlikely to mean the same on every dimension," Ariely
said during a telephone interview. "It just means that overall two
people make sense together." | | |
| C.V. Starr East Asian Library to open March 17
From
its vantage point on the north side of Memorial Glade, the new C.V.
Starr East Asian Library echoes UC Berkeley's classical architecture
while also expressing the building's Asian sensibility. (Steve McConnell/UC Berkeley photos)
C.V. Starr East Asian Library to open March 17
By Kathleen Maclay, Media Relations | 14 March 2008
BERKELEY
– The University of California, Berkeley's new C.V. Starr East Asian
Library - the first freestanding structure at a United States
university erected solely for East Asian collections - will open its
stately bronze doors to the public on Monday, March 17. The
building brings together under one roof the vast collections assembled
by UC Berkeley over the past century that have been housed at several
locations on and off campus. Now, students and other scholars will have
easier and faster access to one of the top East Asian library
collections in the United States.The UC Berkeley collections contain
more than 900,000 volumes, primarily in Chinese, Japanese and Korean.
The library also houses thousands of manuscripts, rubbings of stone and
bronze objects and of inscriptions, and the largest, most comprehensive
and most valuable collection of historic Japanese maps outside of
Japan. It also incorporates UC Berkeley's Center for Chinese Studies
Library, previously located in the Center for Chinese Studies on Fulton
Street and the world's largest academic repository in the United States
of materials on the People's Republic of China. The new library
is named for the late Cornelius Vander Starr, an American International
Group Inc. (AIG) insurance pioneer with a deep interest in Asia who
studied at UC Berkeley as an undergraduate. An $8 million gift from the
C. V. Starr Foundation was pivotal in the library's fundraising
success. More than 1,200 individuals also contributed to the $46.4
million library, which was funded entirely by private donations. Many
donors gave in the honor of the late Chang-Lin Tien, UC Berkeley's
seventh chancellor, the first Asian American to head a major U.S.
research university and an internationally renowned engineering scholar. "The
opening of this spectacular, state-of-the-art facility with our
extensive collections dramatically enhances UC Berkeley's position as
an international leader in East Asian studies," said Peter Zhou,
director of the Starr Library. "We're looking forward to
assisting an ever-increasing number of students and scholars exploring
the rich histories and cultures of East Asia," said Zhou. He noted that
approximately 700 visiting faculty members and other scholars studying
Asia are hosted by UC Berkeley throughout the year and that UC
Berkeley's programs in East Asian studies have been ranked first in the
nation by the U.S. Department of Education.

Light
filtering through the bronze screens forms a shadow pattern on the
floor, while providing a pixellated view of Haviland Hall to the west. |

The
central staircase seems to both float in air and slice through the core
of the building, while an angled skylight brings natural light deep
into the heart of the four-story structure. |

Badges imprinted with the library's chop, or seal, fill a bowl on the main circulation desk. |
| | |
| UC police fail to nab tree sitter
UC Berkeley police tried to remove a man living in an oak tree near the
main entrance to campus on Monday, but they came away empty-handed.
The man, who goes by the name Fresh, is living in the tree to protest
various school policies. Police brought out two ladders and a cherry
picker to try to convince him to come out, but he evaded them by
climbing higher, according to police and the man's supporters on the
ground.
Fresh has been living in the tree just north of Sather Gate with a
hammock, water jugs and a bucket for human waste since Feb. 29.
Police removed a banner that read ``Our Third World College Begins
Here. Save the Oaks'' along with his hammock. But they left the bucket,
a backpack and water jugs.
On Sunday, two of his supporters were arrested and cited for
trespassing, resisting arrest and refusing to leave, police said. They
have been released.
Police have surrounded the tree with metal barricades. About eight
police remained on the scene Monday afternoon. ``He's has his backpack
and a couple of jugs of water, so we're hoping he gets uncomfortable
enough to come down,'' UC Berkeley Assistant Police Chief Mitch Celaya
said. ``We're still not prepared to get in a confrontation to get him
out of the tree -- it's just a misdemeanor. And I'm not prepared to put
my officers at risk.''
This new tree sit is linked to the long-term tree sit to the west of
Memorial Stadium. Since December 2006, a group has been living in trees near the football
stadium to protest UC Berkeley's plan to raze them to build a $125
million sports training center at the grove.
Eight to 10 people
continue to live and sleep in those trees, a tree-sit spokesman said. A
court injunction is preventing any construction on the grove site.
Plans are tied up by lawsuits.
Fresh is living in the new oak tree to bring attention to broader issues at the school.
``He's trying to raise awareness about the fact that the regents are
undemocratic and are making bad decisions, including UC's continuing
involvement in nuclear weapons manufacturing, the (research) deal with
British Petroleum, and cutting down the trees at the oak grove next to
the stadium,'' said Jessica Schley, a UC Berkeley undergraduate student
who is supporting Fresh on the ground. Schley said she was arrested a
week ago for trying to bring Fresh food.
Celaya said the school has Fresh under 24-hour surveillance, and wants
him to come down because he is trespassing. There also are liability
issues, he said.
``People have freedom of speech, but at the same time he doesn't have
freedom to trespass,'' Celaya said. ``There are consequences to
actions.''
Some students who watched Monday's extrication effort wondered why UC
Berkeley is using so much manpower on a guy sitting in a tree.
``There are $2,400 laptops being stolen on campus, and they have this
guy on 24-hour surveillance?'' said Martha Markosyn, who stood under
the tree Monday debating UC police officers. ``There's so many better
things for them to be concerned about.''
Chris Wallis, a graduate student, said he's not sure he agrees with Fresh but supports his right to be there.
``I think this is a form of social protest, and the school accepts
other forms of protest, so I'm not sure why they are making such a big
deal out of this,'' Wallis said. ``I would have to ask the
administration why this form of protest is threatening to them.''
| | |
|