moviereviews4you
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Message: message me


Member Since: 6/19/2006

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Thursday, July 17, 2008

Wanted

I just got back from seeing the movie "Wanted."  To be honest, I'm feeling very conflicted about this particular movie.

This movie was based on the original concept for a comic book series.  As the writer of the comics was writing the story he took it in a slightly different direction, but the studio bought the rights to the original concept, which is what became the movie.  I've briefly skimmed through the trade paper back of the comic, also known as a graphic novel, and I found myself very unimpressed with the brief segments that I looked at.  I was actually looking forward to the movie when I first heard about it, but then looked through the graphic novel and changed my mind.  That should have been my first clue that this movie would not be great.

Visually speaking, the film is stunning.  The action sequences involving trains, jumping cars, and curving bullets are all amazing to watch.  The set design was pretty impressive, and it takes place in Chicago which definitely earns points with me.

However, there is more to a movie than just the production values.  The story is far from great.  The basic story is about a young man who is manipulated by a league of assassins to kill the man that is killing members of this league.  It is not apparent from the beginning that the guy is being manipulated, but as the story proceedes you learn that the leagues has been extremely deceptive about their motives for everything that happens in the story.  What is originally thought to be a league of assassins executing fate becomes a group of pawns for one man's greed and lust for power. 

Deception. Lust. Greed.  The three major motivators in this story, and there's not a positive characteristic among them.  Combine this with the gratuitous amounts of violence and swearing, throw in a few brief sex scenes that do not drive the story any where other than to demonstrate the hatred this man has for his best friend and his girlfriend, and you have a winning combination for a losing movie.

If a movie was nothing more than a bunch of neat action scenes strung together to look cool, then I would be able to feel better about having seen this movie.  Unfortunately, a movie is more than that and has a story.  In this case, the cool production features of the movie do not make up for the story and and I find myself wishing I had spent my time more wisely.  There are any number of things I could have spent time with my roommates doing, but we chose to waste almost 2 hours watching a film that ultimately was not beneficial for any of us.


Tuesday, July 08, 2008

New movie reviews coming soon...hopefully.


Thursday, March 27, 2008

21

This movie is very loosely (so I've been told) based on true events of an actual MIT student that made (and lost) lots of money counting cards in Vegas.

With Kevin Spacey and Lawrence Fishburn, you know the acting should be pretty good.  Add in Jim Sturgess, fresh from the hit Across the Universe, and you get a great group of actors.

I found myself really caught up in the story.  I really started to feel for Ben (Sturgess) and his situation, and I wanted things to work out for him.  A few clever twists were thrown in to keep things fun and interesting.

There were a few scenes in a strip club, so you might want to look at something decidedly away from the screen.  Other than that, I would highly recommend this film.


Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Snore Country for Bored Men

AKA No Country for Old Men.  Javier Bartem was amazing in this.  And that's about the only good thing I have to say.  Here are a few words that I would use to describe the film: long, drawn out, boring, pointless.  There's no real resolution to the film, it just sort of ends with a few scenes pretty much unrelated to anything else that happened in the film.  Lots of build up with no pay off.

Just proves to me that Academy Awards do not necessarily hold any merit.

I'm definitely glad I didn't waste my money on this.  I honestly wouldn't recommend it at all, except for Javier Bartem's performance.


Monday, March 10, 2008

George A. Romero's Diary of the Dead

This is an interesting approach to a zombie film.  This is the fifth title in the Living Dead series of movies that began back in 1968 (that's not counting the remake of Dawn of the Dead).  Documenting the rise of the dead is not a new concept (World War Z is a fictional book documenting the Zombie War), but I don't believe it's ever been done in a movie.  It's a bit predictable, but what zombie flick isn't?  It's filmed with hand held cameras, but it is in no way as shaky as Cloverfield.  It also has an interesting message about media, and how everybody puts their own spin on events.

It's still  a very limited release, so don't expect to find it at just any theatre, but if you do happen to find it and you're in the mood for some zombie gore then go ahead.



Next 5 >>