|
nammom
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Name: Mary Beth Gender: Female
Interests: homeschooling, following the Lord Jesus, being a mom I am "interested" in my husband G, my 8yo son J, my 4yo daughter A, and my 2yo daughter, K. Occupation: Stay at home, homeschooling mo
Message: message me
Member Since:
8/22/2005
|
|
| Runaway Pork Chops -- My Sweet, Funny Little Girl
They say that the first
thing you are supposed to do when you cook is verify that you have all
necessary ingredients.
You would think, by now, I
would know I need to do that; I’ve run into that kind of trouble before. But why do you really need to verify when you
remember, personally, going to the store and buying the required
ingredients? I knew that the key
ingredients, for my dish, were boneless pork chops, apples, and a stuffing mix
package. Each item, I knew I had made
certain to buy when I went to the store.
I distinctly remembered putting them in the cart. Checking would have been a waste of my time,
wouldn’t it?
The first thing I did was
prepare the stuffing mix. I boiled the
water and butter, added the mix, turned off the heat, covered it and moved
on. When I was ready to add it to the
skillet at the end, it would be waiting for me.
Next, I cut up, cored, and
peeled four apples. I’m not really fast
at cutting vegetables, but it didn’t take too awful long. No need to worry about them turning brown,
since I would add them to the skillet to cook along with the pork chops. Apples don’t start turning color as quickly
as something like potatoes do, anyway.
Next, I got out the
skillet and started some butter melting.
It was time to brown the pork chops before adding the other things that
cooked along with them.
I opened the refrigerator
to get out the pork chops.
I guess you know, by now,
what happened. I turned the refrigerator
upside down. I must have opened that
door and checked inside it for the missing pork chops ten times in the next
half hour. Then I checked the
freezer. I called J in, whose job it is
to put away the refrigerated items when we get home from the store. He so often finds things I can’t see. He came up empty. As a matter of fact, he never remembered
seeing them, either. I went out the
freezer in the garage. Sorry. They weren’t there, either.
I know I bought them. I actually pulled out the receipt and checked
it, twice. At first I didn’t see it, but
then I did find them listed. Pork
chops. We paid for them! They had
to be here! So I looked, all over again.
I finally concluded that
somewhere between the check-out counter and the kitchen, the Pork chops were
mislaid.
All that time I had spent
preparing dinner. G was still at work in
our only car. It was too late to start
cooking something else. G wasn’t going
to be able to stop at the store tonight, either. The skillet was dirty with nothing but
butter. The apples sat waiting to be
added to ingredients that weren’t going to show up, as did the stuffing.
I froze the stuffing and
apples for another time. Thawing them
won’t be convenient, but that’s better than letting them go to waste.
Does this sort of thing
happen to anybody other than me?
* * * * *
* * * *
This afternoon, K and I
had some fun together, just the two of us.
The bigger kids were playing outside in the snow. I changed her diaper and we danced together
to one of her CDs, played together on the bed, looking at ourselves in the
mirror. Then I got up to leave the
room. “No, don’t go, mom!” K begged.
She had enjoyed our one on one time.
“Mommy’s hungee,” I said,
repeating the way she talks. (Most two
consonant syllables are shortened to just one the way she talks. For example, play, pray, spray, and pay all
sound like pay when she says them. But
that is another topic. Maybe I’ll
document them here another day.) “You
ate earlier, but I haven’t yet, and I’m hungee.” Seeing that she was still disappointed, I
promised her I would fix my food and bring it back in to spend some more time
with her.
When I returned, she said
to me, “Hungee sounds funny when you say it.”
I guess you had to be there. I
thought that was really funny. I was
just talking the way I learned to talk from her!
As I have discussed here
before, I nurse my toddlers. (Several
times recently she has told me, “I wike your milk, mommy!”) At the end of our time together in the
bedroom, I nursed K. While I did so, I
told her, “You’re my little nursling.”
She patted me back. “You’re my big nursing,” she agreed.
Kids can be so funny
without ever meaning to be!
| | |
| His Love Endures Forever
I have been really
struggling with something the last few days.
I was dealing with something very difficult. The details are not important, but I felt
very hurt. I was crying, praying about
it. “I don’t understand why you
permitted this, Lord? Why do I have to
face this struggle? If I didn’t I wouldn’t
have to . . .” Then it dawned on
me. God had permitted this to force me
to grow, to do the hard thing.
Sometimes, the struggles
we deal with are overcome in a moment.
We make the decision to do what is right, and there is no turning
back. We are convinced that we have done
right, glad to have made the choice to do right, and are now ready to move on
to other things. Other times, the
decision to do right is a daily, hourly, moment by moment thing. Just because I made the choice yesterday, or
even an hour ago, doesn’t mean I’m inclined to do it this minute. I think many, many such struggles are this
variety. An addict overcoming his
addiction. My precious little boy
choosing not to read after bedtime.
Choosing to forgive someone who has wronged you. Choosing not to give in to a temptation that
you’ve fallen prey to so many times before.
This was one of those things. As I have mentioned before, I’ve been reading
in this book about worry. Linda Dillow
was talking about 1 Peter 5:6-7. I’ll
offer its text here:
Humble yourselves, therefore, under God's mighty hand, that he may
lift you up in due time. Cast all your anxiety on him because he cares for
you. (NIV)
She
said that the word for “cast” means literally, to hurl, or to throw (Calm my
Anxious Heart, pg. 124). Because my
struggle involves some worry, I did that, threw the problem to the Lord for Him
to handle, humbled myself to trust in His sovereignty. Then I read some more from my Bible, which
happened today to be Psalm 136.
This Psalm is one that has
been hard for me to understand in the past.
It has a repeated refrain, in every single verse, sometimes after no
more than a phrase, “His love endures forever.” I found the interruption to the train of
thought distracting. It made it hard to
appreciate either God’s Love or the point of the phrases and sentences interspersed
throughout. It came across to me, before
tonight, like nothing more than a constant interruption.
Tonight, I finally got
it. It was a recitation, a review of Israel’s history.
Here is how it begins, in verses 1-5:
Give thanks to the LORD, for He is good. His love endures
forever. Give thanks to the God of gods. His love endures
forever. Give thanks to the Lord of lords: His love endures
forever. to Him who alone does great wonders, His love endures
forever. Who by His understanding made the heavens, His love endures
forever. (NIV)
I guess it actually begins
with a declaration of God’s supremacy and goodness, then spends a little time
on the early history of the world, then transitions to Israel’s history.
With each aspect of history, it repeats the refrain, “His love endures
forever.” The point is this: Everything that happens to God’s people is
evidence of God’s enduring love.
Remember my question of
why God had permitted this struggle?
Yes, even in this, “His love endures forever.” What a great encouragement that was. I
hope it is encouraging to you. | | |
| My Impossible Home -- A Refiner's Fire
I was looking at this book
again recently, hoping to find something to get me on the right track spiritually
again. I hope I turn the book back
up. In the meantime, I will recall what
stood out to me just the other day. She
was talking about Psalm 139. Here, let’s
look at some of the particular verses right now, verses 13-16:
For You created my inmost being; You knit me together in my mother's womb. I praise You because I am fearfully and wonderfully made; Your works are wonderful, I know that full well. My frame was not hidden from You when I was made in the secret place. When I was woven together in the depths of the earth, Your eyes saw my unformed body. All the days ordained for me were written in Your book before one of them came to be.
She said the words, “inmost
being” had something to do with our personalities, what we are really
like. I am certainly not defined by my
weaknesses (at least, I hope not!) but I remembered my poor organizational
skills. God knew, before I was ever
born, that I would struggle with figuring out how to store things. He also “ordained” the fact that I would find
myself in a home of about 1,000 square feet, housing a family of five. This was no cosmic joke, no classic bad luck
to come my way. This was a plan, a
design.
My attempts at dealing
with this have ebbed and flowed.
Sometimes, I really do work at it.
I tackle an area, am delighted by the progress I make. I might even start getting the whole house semi-passable. Then I relax a bit, maybe just for a day or
two, and it looks horrible all over
again. Sometimes I will think about the
impossible situation this is – there is no way to find a place for everything
in a house designed for two or three people at most, when there are five of
us. Why try? I can’t succeed, after all! Then I realize that I am expected to do my
best. This is the job God called me to. So I start again.
Anyway, I had just gotten
to one of those days just after the good phase, and was feeling defeated again,
when I read that. It occurred to me that
God intended this situation for a purpose.
I live here for some reason. This
is intended to be my crucible. I have
been put in the refining fire. What am I doing giving up? I’m supposed to be learning something by struggling with this, not by sitting back in
defeat!
If I can remember that for
more than a few weeks, I’ll be doing well.
I think it is high time I learned whatever I am supposed to learn
here. Then, maybe, God will provide a
bigger house! | | |
| Where's the Memo When Insulin Needs Change?
Diabetes is simply a fact
of my life. I’ve had insulin dependent
diabetes since I was almost fourteen years old.
This isn’t the kind you get when you carry a few extra pounds and need
to mind diet and exercise. This is where
the body does not make insulin at all.
The diabetic, without insulin, starves to death in a sea of food. But, of course, there is no need for that
today, with insulin.
I am so accustomed to life
with diabetes that it is sometimes hard for me to imagine not having it. Counting
carbs and taking insulin for it is just life.
I forget everybody doesn’t do it.
Even insulin reactions don’t faze me much. That is, until I have a few days like the
last few.
My insulin needs, in
recent months, have gotten extreme. I needed
way more insulin than was normal for a person of my height and weight. I didn’t understand it, but neither did I
question it. I had to take what I needed
to survive. My doses were adjusted on
the basis of need. When I took less
insulin for the carbs than one unit for every five grams of carbohydrate, my sugars
went high. Last time I adjusted my
doses, I was running blood sugars of 250 after meals regularly. (Normal is between 70 and 120, though two hours after a
meal, with insulin still working to bring it back down, 150 would be perfectly
acceptable.)
J got sick about a week
ago, and Thursday, I followed suit. I
ate nothing on Thursday because I wasn’t hungry. Friday, I followed the BRAT diet. All day long, my blood sugar went low a
couple of hours later, which I attributed to the lack of protein and minimal
fat in that diet to keep the carbs in my system as long as the insulin was
active. Saturday, I had a horrible,
horrible low.
Lows, or insulin
reactions, typically cause shakiness, confusion, irritability, sometimes even
cold sweats. Reactions like these, I can
handle. It is the other kind that I really
can’t. Diabetics can be arrested for DUI
for an insulin reaction. While I’ve
never been drunk, I think I know something of how it feels.
I can go unconscious while
low, or have periods that I was awake but have no memory of afterwards. But the reaction that I hate more than any
other is the kind where I lose muscle control.
I cannot walk. Simple tasks like
bringing my hand to my mouth (or my bloody finger to the test strip) are almost
impossible. I will my body to cooperate,
but the result is jerky, sloppy motions that miss the mark. Instead of walking, I crawl, and the crawling
usually involves wildly flailing limbs.
I feel really horrible, and when it happens, it seems to last until my
sugar is well into the normal range. It
seems to happen, too, with lows that don’t want to respond to the sugar that I
am given to offset them.
Such was the low I had
Saturday afternoon. G and I battled this
reaction for a couple of hours. He
brought me juice that I spilled all over myself. He squirted a glucose gel in my cheek before
that, which I instinctively spit out. (Every
time I’ve been given this stuff, always when I was too incapacitated to eat or drink,
I’ve spit it out. I don’t know why.) I had just showered before, but now I had
glucose all over my face and in my hair.
My clean clothes were soaked in orange juice. G dealt with the mess on the carpet.
After a reaction like
that, I don’t want another, not for a long time. I called the on-call endocrinologist, who “just
happened” (thank you, Lord) to be my regular diabetes doctor. She suggested cutting my basal rates (that
is, the amount I get automatically throughout the day via my insulin pump) by
twenty-five percent. This I did. There they remain.
Sunday evening, after a
normal meal, it happened again. This
time, I was fully conscience and I think coherent the entire time, but I did
experience the awful loss of muscle control.
G brought me my kit and various sources of glucose, and my muscle
problem was not so extreme that I couldn’t manage those tasks of checking my
sugar and eating/drinking the necessary carb sources. I still couldn’t walk, and we both went to
bed much later than normal, after we knew my blood sugars were finally back
where they should be.
Today, I called my
doctor. She recommended that I cut my insulin
to carb ratio from 1 unit for every five grams of carb to one unit for every
ten. Remembering my last experience of
250-300 blood sugars with a much lower insulin to carb ratio, I expected to
have to adjust it in between the two.
While I’ve not had lows since then, my sugars two hours after eating are
lower than they should be. I may have to
adjust to more carbs per unit of insulin before this is through!
I really wish my body
could make gradual changes in insulin needs, rather than dramatic ones. And I wish I could get some sort of warning
when it was about to happen.
I usually don’t even think
about what having diabetes means to me.
At times like this, I wish I’d never heard the word, but once again, I
am grateful G was there to deal with them both times. What if it had happened when he wasn’t at
home? J has certainly had my diabetes
explained to him, but he’s never had the responsibility of dealing with it
alone. I pray he never does. While G dealt with the Saturday reaction, he sent the kids to the back yard. He usually prefers to have them out of the room, at least.
I am grateful for God’s
provision for me when I need someone else there to help me. In twenty-two insulin dependent years, I’ve
never been alone or even alone with my children when I was unable to care for
myself. That is God’s provision. I’m grateful for it, even though, for the
moment, I wish I’d never heard the word “diabetes.” | | |
| A Noncommittal Reaction to the Courtship Movement
Today, I want to share my
latest thoughts on the matter of courtship.
I realize that there are all kinds of people who may come across my
blog, and this word has unfortunately become a catch all word to describe all
sorts of things. I’ll talk about the
different interpretations about it, and what I think about each one.
Probably the most common
use of the term is simply another name for dating, albeit an “old fashioned”
one. This was how I knew it for much of
my life. I was unfamiliar with the new
applications of this term prior to my own marriage. I consider myself fortunate to have come
through the “dating” scene unscathed, for a couple of important reasons. One, my parents taught me well. They didn’t make rules that I had to wonder
the purpose of. They talked to me about
the why’s. As a result, the other reason
is that I was encouraged to develop, and did, very conservative dating
standards. I knew that if I wasn’t
careful, I would be strongly tempted to do some things I didn’t intend to
do. In the end, my experience was much
like an early courtship one, in spite of the fact that I didn’t know the term
and didn’t aspire to do “courtship.”
The problem is that my
experience isn’t the common one. Too
many people out there have sad stories of bad experiences in the dating
scene. It isn’t just easy to get involved physically with the
person you are dating, it is presumed and even expected. It seems as though
literally everyone is “doing it,” thinks it is great, and many Christian young
people find it all too easy to join in.
Then things go wrong, and they greatly regret it. Even if a person only gets involved with the
person s/he later marries, Christians can really come to regret taking too soon
what didn’t belong to them. It wasn’t
pleasing to God; thus, for someone desiring to please Him, it ultimately doesn’t
please them, either (even if it did in the heat of the moment).
How can we reverse this
trend? How can we end up with fewer casualties
of morality in the dating scene? That is
what caused the buzz about courtship. It
began as an alternative to dating. You
wait until you are ready to get married to begin a relationship, and you enter
into it for the purpose of finding a life partner. This isn’t casual or “just for fun.” This is only to find a marriage partner. Most courting couples would also seek the
oversight of their parents, keeping them accountable for purity, if nothing
else. Many times, the time they spend
together is spent with their
families. One of the earliest proponents
of this was Joshua Harris, author of the book noted above.
Harris’ book came out
after I was already married, but curiosity led me to read it, and I found a lot
there that I agreed with. I was pleased
that, though I didn’t set out to do “courtship,” my end result was much like
what Harris encouraged striving for. I
thought the idea was wise; this was something any Christian young person should
strive for.
Unfortunately, courtship
has continued to develop. People kept
trying to improve on Harris’ ideas. And,
unfortunately, not every couple that starts “courting” discovers that the other
person is what s/he thought that person was.
Rather than finding marriage material, even one committed to courtship
could end up with a broken heart.
It seems that many,
perhaps even the majority of contemporary courtship proponents think that a
broken heart is the ultimate tragedy that must, at all cost, be avoided. Many of the current courtship advocates seem
to almost be proposing a return to arranged marriages. Some actually discourage the development of
any romantic feelings at all!
A significant number of
courtship advocates are homeschoolers.
Some of these people have adopted some very rigidly defined roles for
men and women that must never be crossed.
These people look at the cultural habits in New Testament times as the
model for how we should behave in the present times. Women should not pursue a higher education;
in fact, they should continue living under their father’s roof until a suitable
husband enters the scene. Only once she
is married is she allowed to move out of her father’s home, and into the care
of her husband. She and her husband must
never even entertain the thought of her working outside the home.
Joshua Harris, I think,
had some great ideas. But these more
extreme versions of courtship are bad news, in my assessment, and blind to the
realities of contemporary life in the United States – or even elsewhere. Some of these can get so extreme it is
scary. I’ve actually heard the idea
suggested that parents should not help their daughters get drivers
licences. Instead, they should wait and
let her future husband make the decision about whether she needs one!
There is actually a new
movement out there, too. For those who
think that courtship is too risky, you can always go the route of a
betrothal!
I suppose having a more Biblical term
makes it a more Godly choice. The couple
goes from being friends to being engaged, and this engagement involves a
commitment. It is supposed to be as
binding as marriage. This is very, very
much like a genuine arranged marriage.
It is really too bad that
a nice term like courtship has been ruined by some very rigid people out
there. And it is downright scary to
think of returning to arranged marriages.
I would have to wonder if some of the extreme courtship and betrothal
advocates are major control freaks who desire to control their children’s
entire futures. Our children are people –
people with the freedom, especially given the culture in which we live – to make
choices of their own. What happens if a
girl who has a thirst for knowledge and ambition to serve God as a missionary
nurse ends up with parents who think she should not have any education beyond
high school, and that she must stay under their roof until Mr. Right
arrives? What if God’s plan is to use
her as she is – unmarried? A girl who loves the Lord in such a rigid
environment may end up rebelling against everything. Is that really what they want to drive their
children into? It is scary stuff.
So those are my thoughts on
courtship. I don’t know if you could say
I am for it or against it. It all
depends on what the term means to you.
Tell me that, and then I’ll decide whether or not I actually like it.
Well, there's my opinion, whether you wanted it, or not. I have lots of them, and give them out freely. I like to think it is worth more than what you paid for it, but there are no guarantees.
| | |
|