Friday, July 18, 2008

Monday, July 14, 2008

  • Ambiguity of tougher sentencing

    Keeping more criminals behind bars leads to more crimes?

     

     

     

    Just a few months ago I’ve managed to experience the frustration dealing with polices, when my mobile was stolen at work almost under broad daylight. With help from my colleagues I was able to find out who did it and forwarded the info to the police. The police did not fail me: after a few brief conversations over the phone and they seem to have vanished into thin air #1, precisely what I’ve been expecting. While the chance of recovering it would be slim regardless of police involvement, one could not help wondering what would be like if there are tougher sentencing in place?

     

    Most of us would agree tough sentencing would deter common crimes and are willing to push it as far as to lock up anyone behind bars #2 for the most trivial crime. However we’re also confronted with the long term consequences by incarcerating a good proportion of the population.

     

    Provided tougher sentencing leads to a heavier financial burden in terms of new facilities and increased overhead costs for staffs, the correctional institutions will actively seek to alleviate the burden by taking more jobs into the prison, which will then end up eroding manual jobs on the labour market and pushing more people into criminal activities.

     

    The prison itself also serves as an institution to further “educate” criminals (so much for life-long education), therefore by locking up shoplifters behind bars we could very well be providing the skills to prepare them for bank robbery.

     

    The essence in crime fighting lies in preventing it before the actual crime takes place, instead of tougher punishment to deter criminals. We should devote more focus on correction rather then punishment, more resource should have been poured into social work, counseling and communities. While crime being one of the main debate grounds in the upcoming New Zealand General election, votes should consider the fact that seemingly straight-forward approach may carry sequences that may have not been informed by those who propose it. It would be a shame for us to commit the same mistake as the ones we considered wrong – by miscalculating the consequences of our own misdeeds.

     

     

    Keyword - Prison Industrial Complex, Differential Association

     

    #1 - Who would actually consider speeding and drunk driving more serious then lost of property? or drivers are simply easier to pick on?

    #2 - Or even more extreme as to advocate for the return of capital punishment, chop guillotine chop! 

     

     

    p.s. anyone selling first-gen iphone? leave me a message.

     

    Trackback : http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/story.cfm?c_id=280&objectid=10521414

Saturday, May 24, 2008

  • it's all in the air

    iPhone Air
    - Reports are suggesting that a queue has formed outside the Manhattan Apple store which appreantly waiting to buy the non-existance UMTS iPhone [
    link]. While this could be a publicity stunt or prank, it nevertheless recieved very negative opinion and the act itself was considered by many as stupid. In turn the view could translate into strerotyping and harms iPhone's sale just like the fat Zune tattoo guy [link] harming Zune's sales by attaching an "un-cool" factor with the product.

    Note: this is not an actual product, wise up.

    Adobe Air
    - Have been playing around with a few applications made by Adobe Air (by which I mean Flex or Flash), I have to say Air could be far superior as a platform to deploy small RIAs (Rich Internet Applications) then the Mircosoft .net framework. Not only it has a smaller memory footprint, the apps are so much more aethestically pleasing, and of course, justifying why RIAs is more then just having your gmail on your desktop. 

    snackr  

Monday, May 12, 2008

Sunday, May 11, 2008

  • Quote of the week month year century eon

    學生 : 胡爺爺, 你為什麼想當主席?
    胡錦濤 : 我告訴你,我本人沒有想當主席. 是全國人民選了我, 讓我當主席, 我不應該辜負全國人民的期望. 對不對? 

     

     

Thursday, May 01, 2008

  • Kiwi ingenuity

    While Mr.Sarkozy, the French president, is busy patching up his relationship with China (whose people vowed to boycott France and French enterprises - namely some of the most beloved brands in China such as Carrefour and Louis Vuitton, provoked by Mr.Sarkozy’s threat to boycott the Chinese Olympics and the alleged sponsorship to Tiebt’s government-in-exile by Louis Vuitton #), here in New Zealand the Olympic committee decided to take the subtle approach to the boycott campaign, by dressing its athlete in the worse conceivable way ever possible, quoting the New Zealand Herald:

    “The black, clog-like footwear [Corcs] were unveiled tonight as part of the New Zealand Olympic team uniform……The uniform, designed by Levin-based company Kapinua, includes a track suit, short and long sleeved T-shirts, casual shorts, a polo shirt, a blazer with either trousers or a skirt, sports tops, sports cap and sports socks….. Many of the garments, which all come in either black or white, have three Chinese characters on them which mean "New Zealand". (NZ Hearald, Sport story, Alanah Eriksen)

    The result is more then terrifying, in fact it’s so terrifying, the Herald, in the desperate attempt to overturn this decision, decided to make considerable emphasis on the footwear itself. In my opinion, this is ingenious; it’s like attending your ex-boy/girl friends’ wedding and dressed like a hobo (homeless), just to show the newly-weds how mad you are.

    Now they’ve screwed the uniform, all I could hope is they got the three Chinese characters* right.

    NI6W3862 link to an enlarged picture - Warning, viewers discrtion advised

    # Interestingly, even though it’s widely rumored that Louis Vuitton (LVMH) owns part of Carrefour, which is not in the first place, Louis Vuitton actually sued Carrefour’s China branch for selling counterfeit Louis Vuitton bags.

    * On a side note, there are two versions of translation to the name "New Zealand" in Chinese, one being the complete transliteration ("Niu-Zeelan"), the other being half literal, half transliteration ("Shin-Zeelan"). Provided that the "old zealand" (the Dutch province Zeeland) is less known then the newer one (hurray), there really isn't much point making distinction by calling it "Shin-Zeelan".