the twoberry patchwhy, howdy, brer monkey!
twoberry
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit twoberry's Xanga Site!

Name: Bob
Country: United States
State: Florida
Metro: Vero Beach
Birthday: 2/17/1940
Gender: Male


Interests: No time for hobbies. I take them too seriously. Everything becomes an avocation or I drop it after about five years. Usually.
Expertise: Pretty good to very good at a lot of things: world-class in Scrabble, used to be w-c in bridge, former classical music DJ (particularly big fan of Amy Beach, but nobody comes close to Beethoven, tho Shostakovich and Dvorak are not to be snubbed, and Bartok's great, and of course, a day without Mozart is like a day without sunshine), proud former owner of the world's most awesome dog, Sabrina, who was put to sleep at the ripe old age of 16 and who was a golden retriever/German Shepherd/Sonoran wolf mixture and the winner of four blue ribbons in obedience but they didn't really count because the American Kennel Club, snobs that they are, only allow mutts to compete at practice matches, and ask me if I care, and what else am I good at? Well, I was a croupier in Las Vegas for 20 years, had the same job for 16 yrs in a line of work where the average longevity was one year and I survived three outright purges ("fire everybody" but let Lipton stay), which I'm very proud of.
Occupation: Security Guard
Industry: Hospital


Message: message meEmail: email me


Member Since: 1/14/2003
True Lifetime

SubscriptionsSites I Read
coujeaux
RedHairedCelt
TheFlowerDoctor
eadie
harmony0stars
hilton156
mama_jess
bayouboy1026
Eccentrique
JustMeAndy
soul_survivor
RnBoW_SPOT
paison_de_moot
Book_of_Ruth
DonnaLou
thereluctantsinger
The_Queen_Bea
Carol_1
syntaxian
vexations
BoureeMusique
brendaclews
jerjonji
momofjenmatt
Drakonskyr
lionne
quiltnmomi
robbie_caudle

Blogrings
Poetic Challenge
previous - random - next

~*~Old People, Platinum Treasures Of Society~*~
previous - random - next

ellen degeneres’ fans from planet xanga.
previous - random - next

*Lethal_Words*
previous - random - next

OPOX
previous - random - next

Flying Spaghetti Monsterism
previous - random - next

Grown-ups with Content WORTH being Featured
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Friday, May 16, 2008

At Last!  The Uniter Unites!

(alternative title:  Will the United States ever be United?)

President Bush has accused Barack Obama of being an "appeaser," which has been a dirty word ever since Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain appeased Hitler by not challenging his occupation of Czechoslovakia in 1938.  (Apologies if I got any facts wrong.  Time is short, as usual.)

And Candidate McCain agrees with Bush.  And the Dems are fast uniting behind Obama.  Even Hillary termed Bush's accusation "offensive" and "outrageous."

I'll just say it once in my own words:  there is nothing wrong with TALKING with leaders we don't like.  In fact, it's crucial that we do.  This is not appeasement.  This is not, as our unesteemed president has said, hoping that we can come up with some magical argument that will convince Ahmadinejad that he's wrong, wrong, wrong.  We need to keep lines of communication open because that is the only hope for survival.  Blowing each other off the face of the earth is not going to work.  Duh.  Bush's foreign policy of "killing all the terrorists" is creating terrorists faster than we can kill them off.  The way to win the war on terror is to get terrorists to stop terrorizing.  Not by appeasing.  But by reaching an understanding that it is for their own good, and the good of their people, as well as for us and our people, that we choose diplomacy over violence.  We choose talking over locking ourselves in our private sanctuaries and plotting how to kill each other.  It is that simple.  The HARD part is reaching an understanding.  The Bushies say it's more than hard, it's impossible.  I say it's impossible only if we don't try.  There is nothing wrong with trying.

 

 


Monday, May 05, 2008

(A republication -- from Jan. 12-14, 2007)

 

Tractors and Dead Emus

tractor                                         emu

 

 

 

 

 

It was a light and stormy night.  (Shut up, this is MY short story, and not every stormy night is "dark."  How could they be?  Is there no such thing as lightning?  Wouldn't that keep the dark away?  How did that cliche get started anyway?)

So it was a light and stormy night, and I was at my usual barstool perch helping the barkeep reduce his vodka stock.  I'm a serial Bloody Mary drinker, dontcha know.

The lightning was indeed brightening the night sky, and it flashed again just at the same moment as a tall leggy blonde came in through the door.  The ensuing crack of thunder caused me to turn my head in that direction, and I could see the silhouetted curvature of her legs through the diaphanous white skirt she was wearing.

Imagine my surprised delight when this stranger headed straight toward the empty barstool to my immediate left, and introduced herself as May Eisenglass.  "Yes, you may have a glass of whatever you're drinking," I offered, trying to conceal my excitement over this glamorous hunk of pulchritude that seemed to want to get to know ME, Gus Nosir, private eye.  (Guy Noir's my cousin; I learned the trade from him, added some esses to the name because that's how I am, then shortened Gussy to Gus because what private dick calls himself Gussy?)

**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************
**********************************************************************

She leaned over and whispered something in my ear, grazing not only that delighted organ but the other organ stirred as well, as her hand "accidentally" brushed against the inside of my thigh.

"Barkeep?" I called out, trying to ignore the slight catch in my throat.

"Yessir, Mr. Nosir?" replied the bartender.

"A vodka martini for the lady, please."

"Coming right up."

Unaccustomed as I am to being cozied up to by ravishing long-stemmed blondes, I was jolted back to reality by what May said next.

"I need your professional services," she blurted out, as she was sipping her drink.

Resisting the urge to tell her I needed her professional services, I asked for the specifics.

"The emu rancher down the street from my house is accusing one of my chings of killing his precious birds," she said.

"Your I-chings?" I replied incredulously.  "Is that like some of that Feng Shui bullshit?  And how would that kill an emo kid?  And what difference does it make if another emo gets killed?  Happens all the time."

"Either you've had too many Bloody Marys or there's a wax buildup in your ears.  I didn't say 'I ching,' I said 'my chings.'  A ching is a cross between a chow and a bulldog and I breed them.  We have two adults and six puppies at home.  And I didn't say 'emo,' I said 'emu.'  You know.  The bird?"

"I didn't even know there WAS an emu ranch in this town.  You say emus are getting killed, and your chings are thought to be responsible?"

"Exactly.  And if you met my dogs, you'd see how gentle they are.  Can I interest you in solving the case of what's killing the emus?"

Well, I was more interested in meeting her dogs than finding emu-killers, especially if it meant being invited to her place.  So I quickly answered yes when she suggested that I come to her house that night and see her eight chings.

*****************************************************************
*****************************************************************
*****************************************************************

On our way to May's house, we drove by the emu ranch.  The rain had stopped, and it was kind of dark even though the power hadn't gone out and the street lamps were lit.  I could just make out a large clump of something.  Feathers?  In the corner of the fenced-in block.

If emus are like us, they'd be asleep this time of morning, but there were about 20 of them, chittering around and all agitated.  It was just then that I saw a black object -- a dog? -- squeezing through a hole in the fence about halfway between street intersections.   My car nearly collided with the thing as it reached the street.  No, not a dog.  It was ... a tractor.  A remote-controlled tractor.  It skittered away.

At the next corner we came to, thanks to a nearby street lamp, I could make out the bodies of two emus, their necks criss-crossing each other.  That first clump I saw was what?  Same thing?

On we went, arriving at May's house moments later.  The chings greeted us as we entered, and the lady was right.  Gentle, affectionate animals all.  They weren't the emu killers.

"I'll have a talk with the emu owner," I told her, "and get him to understand he must have mistaken that 18-inch-high remote-controlled tractor for one of these dogs in the dark.  I normally charge $200 a day, plus expenses, but maybe we can work something else out ..."

Before May could answer, a male voice made itself heard.  "You won't be working 'something else' out, buddy.  That happens to be my wife you're thinking of screwing."

I hadn't known there was anyone else in the house, but there he was, getting up from the couch in the living room, beer can in hand.  "Whoa," I said.  "Nothing has happened, and nothing will."

He calmed down.  But I noticed something peculiar.  In one hand was a beer can, and in the other was what looked like a TV remote.

But funny thing.  There was no TV set in the living room.

The End

Back in the day, I was an Alfred Hitchcock junkie, and he often finished his stories verbally after the teleplay had ended.  So this is Twoberry, in his best Alfred Hitchcock imitation, telling you that ...

You readers will be pleased to know that Gus reported the beer-guzzling tractor owner to the Animal Cruelty Officer of the local Humane Society, he was duly arrested and put in jail for cruelty to emus and Gus enjoyed a liaison with May after all, though the relationship didn't last as long as he'd have hoped.  He never warmed up to the dogs, and received his mar-ching orders.

*************************************************

Afterword

And now, as Twoberry, I'll confess that while the foregoing is wholly fictional, it was inspired by real facts and events.  But be not alarmed.  No emus were harmed in the writing of this story, and while there really is an emu ranch in Vero Beach (which I hadn't known about until a few days ago), and while there really is a remote-controlled 18-inch-high tractor toy being manipulated through a hole in their fence and driving the emus slightly nuts as the tractor owner gets his jollies from the comfort of his porch, please be assured the emus are all alive and healthy.

Unfortunately, there ARE some dead animals in this town, and the two clumps of emu bodies in the story are similar to what Barbara and I saw on the corners of our block the other night as we were taking Yoo-Hoo out for her evening constitutional.  Not just two street corners.  On all FOUR corners of our block, were pairs of dead chickens -- a white chicken and a red chicken at each corner -- their mangled bodies partially visible as they were sticking out of paper bags.  Their necks criss-crossed each other, just like in the story.

We're thinking they're some kind of ritual killing, some kind of crazy cult, something.  And the sightings HAVE been reported to the Animal Cruelty Officer of the local Humane Society, and if I learn anything more about this bizarre incident, I will let you know.

Oh, and the thing about tractors and an emu ranch.  I got into a conversation last week with some folks who told me about those two little items, and I said it might be fun to write a story that included those two elements.  Just for kicks.

***********************************

A year and a half later -- in case you're curious, no word was ever received by me, about the chickens.  The emus are still thriving.  The guy with the toy tractor has gone on to bigger things.

 


Sunday, May 04, 2008

A Totally Nonpolitical Entry

www.makeadifference.com

This is nonpolitical, and the next blog entry as well.

Please watch at least one of these videos.   "Blue Ribbon Movie" and "The Teddy Stallard Story" and the "You Are Love Movie."  Yes, they're sentimental and manipulative.  In that respect, they're kinda like that Will Smith movie a few years ago that I can't remember the title of, or the "Paying It Forward" movie that I DO remember the title of.

Anyway, click on one, two, or three of these movies, or maybe find some more that I haven't linked.  I promise that you'll find them inspiring.

I admit.  They're designed to suck you into paying big bucks to sign Mary Robinson Reynolds for a high-priced seminar to inspire your work force.  Well, if you're not a CEO someplace, then there's no problem, right?  If you ain't got the bucks, you can't be tempted.  And if you do have the bucks, haven't you ever heard of sales resistance?

Me, I don't have the bucks.  But I do love to share.  So enjoy the videos, and say thanks for the fact that I'm not talking about Barack Obama until at least Tuesday.

Tomorrow, I'll be republishing the short story I wrote a year and a half ago.  I don't expect as many comments now as I got back then -- average was about 40 -- but however sick you are of the ongoing political campaign, I always keep my promises.  Nothing about Obama (or politics) until at least Tuesday.


Friday, May 02, 2008

The Issues, Please

The Issues

So now they're hammering Michelle Obama for selfishly wanting every voter in America to find ways to help Malia and Sasha Obama (her two young daughters).  At least that's the way Michelle Malkin is making it sound.

Anyone reading this who even remotely has any respect for Malkin, please stop reading and have the courtesy to let me know (privately, of course) that you have unsubscribed.

Malkin is worse than Bill O'Reilly and Sean Hannity and Rush Limbaugh combined, because most of the intelligent public is already aware of their biases, and is on guard.  Malkin's not quite as famous, and hence more dangerous, because some folks might unwittingly read her garbage and be influenced by it.  She even pretends to be a journalist.  At least Limbaugh is unabashedly a comedian doing a schtick, not that he admits it in those words.  But I wouldn't say he pretends to be a pundit, noting that his tongue MUST be in his cheek.  Mustn't it?

I shouldn't worry so much.  Anyone who would be influenced by Malkin is solidly in the other camp, anyway.  I am happy and anxious to welcome uncommitted and Republican-leaning citizens into the Obama movement, if they're of a mind to join.  But for the ones whose minds are made up to never vote for Obama, well, I will generously hold good thoughts for their financial and physical well-being, but if they don't want to think about joining us, then all I can ask is for them to please get out of our way.

We ARE going to talk about issues, folks.  We are NOT going to talk about Jeremiah Wright.

Which was EXACTLY Michelle Obama's point, in her interview with Meredith Vieira, as any intelligent person listening could plainly hear.  After one or two opening questions that also had to do with Rev. Wright, here's how it went:

MEREDITH VIEIRA: Michelle, do you feel that the Reverend Wright betrayed your husband?

MICHELLE OBAMA: I think Barack has spoken so clearly and eloquently about this.

MEREDITH VIEIRA: But do you personally feel that the Reverend Wright…

MICHELLE OBAMA: You know what I think Meredith? I think we gotta move forward. You know, this conversation doesn’t help my kids. You know, it doesn’t help kids out there who are looking for us to make decisions and choices about how we’re going to better fund education.

In other words, practically in the same breath the Senator's wife correctly switched her focus to the importance of ALL kids, not just her own.  Not that there was anything terribly wrong in personalizing the answer, conveying quite appropriately that she is a parent who is concerned for her kids just as any parent would be.

But of course the other Michelle -- Malkin -- has learned her lesson well from the garbagey likes of O'Reilly and Hannity.  Find the crucial sound bite, and twist the meaning and then bombard the reader/listener with constant repetition.

She's right about one thing, this Malkin person is.  Mrs. Obama was tired of answering variations of the same old Wright questions, and wanted to talk about the issues.

*****************************

From now on, every single question about Rev. Wright should be answered in approximately the following vein:

I think Rev. Wright might agree (or might disagree; it doesn't matter) with our plan to launch a Children’s First Agenda that provides care, learning and support to families with children from birth up to five years old.  Barack believes that the goal of No Child Left Behind was the right one, but that it was written and implemented poorly and it has demoralized our educators and broken its promise to our children. Barack will fund No Child Left Behind and improve its assessments and accountability systems.  

Our schools will be improved by recruiting well-qualified teachers to every classroom in America, by rewarding expert, accomplished teachers for taking on challenging assignments and helping teachers succeed, and by reducing the high school dropout rate and closing the achievement gap by investing in proven intervention strategies in the middle grades and in summer learning and afterschool opportunities.

Barack will create a new American Opportunity Tax Credit that will make tuition at the nation’s community colleges completely free and will cover up to two-thirds the cost of tuition at the nation’s public colleges and universities. This $4,000 tax credit will be fully refundable and available at the time of enrollment in college – when families need the money.

(My suggested answer is just one of several possibilities and is taken mostly verbatim from www.barackobama.com.) 

*********************

Yes, we do need to stop talking about Wright.  But I suffer from the same malady as many folks -- whether we're on the transmitting or receiving side of this tiresome issue.  The malady is, I can't stop talking about it and I can't stop reading about it and I can't stop listening when the subject comes up.

And I can't quite stop writing about it.  For others who suffer from the same illness I have, my latest essay -- where I commend Barack Obama on the timing of his distancing himself from Rev. Wright -- appears immediately below this entry.  (Just give me two seconds to make it "public.")

*********************

[Saturday edit] I've been looking for a video of Barack's March 18 speech -- the link I published on March 19 was to www.barackobama.com, but the now-famous speech on race is difficult to find there -- and so I wanted to publish a different link here .  I don't know how much longer it will be viable.  Had to scroll down to April; hopefully there is a calendar at that website where you can plug in a date and get there at any time in the future.  To hear the speech full-length, click on "menu" and the rest is easy.

Tomorrow I expect to post a blog with the working title of "A Break From Politics."  Some of you, I'm sure, will look forward to that.

[Later]  Ah, nuts.  I can't get find a way to hear past the first 9 minutes or so.

[Sunday edit]  Ah, success.  TRY THIS LINK.  Read the speech, or scroll down to where you can hear it.

Now I think I'll go looking for Michelle's speech that she gave in Wisconsin the night before the primary there.  The one where she said, "For the first time in my adult lifetime, I am really proud of my country."

You know what?  I just accidentally found a link to her remarks that contained only an excerpt, and in that excerpt the word "really" was deliberately excised from the audio.  But you can clearly read her lips, and she said what I heard her say at the time.  Is there nothing that the right-wing media will not stoop to?  Or was it a Hillary supporter?  John Keitel is the name of the author of the fake piece.  Anybody know who he is?


Using Good Judgment

Writing about Barack Obama's seeming lack of good judgment and character, Susan Estrich of Fox News asked:

"Did he really believe [Jeremiah Wright] to be a better, more decent, more honorable man than he was? Or was he afraid that black voters would be offended by his denunciation of someone who, at least initially, was advertised as a respected figure in the black church?

"Barack Obama doesn’t have to convince anyone that he disagrees with what Wright has to say and what he stands for. That’s easy. You can’t have heard a single speech that Obama has given in the last year and make that mistake.

"What he has to do, if he is to effectively put this bad chapter to rest, is provide some explanation for why it took him so long and why he seemed to find it so difficult to do to this guy what most of us wanted to do to him the first time we saw a single clip of his hateful rants"

The explanation she's asking for is contained in the first paragraph of the quoted material. And I'm not talking about "political expediency," which to me is what she implies by citing afraidness that black voters might take offense. But that very prospect does contain the clue to the answer.

I've said many times that I admire Wright and I still do. The incendiary snippets were taken out of the context of legitimate sermons that drew parallels between Biblical stories and episodes in our nation's history that depict the worst side of our government's policies.

It is not unpatriotic to talk about your government's past mistakes in hopes of encouraging better policies in the future.

Before this week, all Wright was ever guilty of was using incendiary and controversial language in that kind of context. Had Obama acted any sooner to disassociate himself from his pastor, it would have been an act of disloyalty that, to me at least, and I presume to Obama as well, might have been regarded as condemnatory in itself. In other words, Obama would have been regarded by Wright sympathizers as disloyal.

The excesses perpetrated by Wright this past week, especially including the accusation that Obama had not meant what he said when he repudiated those earlier offensive proclamations, carried the whole business far enough that not only did Obama HAVE to act as he did, but he was ABLE to act as he did without incurring any significant loss of black support. That's because Wright's extremely bad behavior was offensive to ALL Americans, not just the right-wing extremists who had tried to make political hay with 30-second sound bites.



Next 5 >>


<bgsound src="http://www.eclassical.com/eclassic/eclassical?&composer_id=2&genre_id=8&last_page=small%" loop="infinite">