|
yeungx
|
read my profile
sign my guestbook
Country: Canada
State: British Columbia
Metro: Vancouver
Gender: Male
Interests: badminton, acting, math, debating,
Expertise: n/a
Occupation: Student
Industry: Education/Research
Message: message me
Member Since:
2/13/2005
|
|
SubscriptionsSites I Read
|
|
|
|
| I was rushed by the end of the last post so I did not really get the point of the post. now that I read it I also messed up the punch line.(not that it's a joke)
The point of yesterday's post is: You can tell the Gender of the writer by figureing out who is more agreesive in a relationship. if it is the guy that is making all the move, the writer is a girl, if the girl makes the first move, or is more agreesive than normal, the writer is a guy. This have not failed me yet. (wanna hear an exeption)
Now lets think about this for a second. And you will see where I am going with this. we all know writing is an a place we the writer is god and decide what happens. So my argument is that, everyone want the other person in a relationship to make the moves.
I don't think anyone is going to argue with that, now that I write it out.
so why is that? What is it about making the first move that make every scaried? and why do we men get stuck doing it.
| | |
| I am going to reveal a dark and deep secret. I read romantic novals. but my sexuallity is not in question right now. The topic today is, do writer have a hard time take on the point of view of the other sex when writing romanic novals.
for everyone who read more than 5 of these things. A pattern will quickly appear. I mean common, they are preety much the same. What ever the background plot is, guy meets ngirl they fall in love... you know the story. however reasently I found that I could peredict what gender the auther is (as in know what it is before I read the biography). How ???? there is usally one fail free indicator. I will give you two guess...
...
...
...
Who make more aggrisive in the relationship.
that is it. this post will continue
but I want to hear from all the romantic books readers out there.
I am right??
No post about my sexallity please
| | |
| Ever notice?
some people's blog are always dark, always depressing. They seem so down all the time. which make me wounder are they really like this or are they just trying to give people what they want to read.
I have to admit that I too, want to read intimate work. as if looking for someone who shear my pain. And in my first blog, I felt this pressure to do somthing dark intimate. This the what is ironic about this unique media. it is so private and yet very public. It's suppose to be letting out this inner voice and yet everyone is judging your inner voice. How is the different from screeming out "I am a depressed child and the world is meaning less" out in the middle of the street. (yet it feels very different)
The question is does all this depressing "self pitty" type of writing make one feel better, or does it merely reinforce the "woe is me" type of thinking. In other words is the blog culture contributing to teenage depression.
ok. May be that is going a little to far, but bare with me here. If the media encurage people to only think and write down depressing thoughts (and don't try to tell me it's not, because it is), which inturn encourage one to be depressed. Which causes people to write down more depressing things. The cycle goes on.
Eventually a person can gain a reputation online for being dark. Which only means that it will actually be harder for that person to shear happier moments.
it's like Quantum physics "by observing you are changing the observed"
ironic huh, privete and yet so public.
Love to hear what you think, please comment
but only if you have something to add to the topic
or you have reasons to disagree
in other words not stupid posts | | |
|
