| | 5. My weakest point - I find fantasy pro football to be too arbitrary. I mean why should I care about how players from different teams do? I mean why should I care about Ocho Cinco and the Bears Defense at the same time? On top of that, what about the intangibles? I mean would a fantasy league champ really do well as a GM in the NFL? I don't think so! Most leagues don't care about the salary cap, and no league cares about your GM skills in terms of landing players. There's more to being a GM than just selecting players. Just because you want a player in real life, doesn't mean you will land him. If a GM comes off as a total jerk, do you think he'll want to sign with him? GMs for the most part need to be somewhat charismatic. The worse part is that there is no way to credit the OL with points. The OL is the most crucial unit on the field. Without the OL, the QB doesn't get time to throw to the WRs. Without the OL, the RB doesn't have holes to run through. How can you credit the OL with points for stats? I mean do you give an OL points for each pancake? It seems to me that you would have to credit the OL points based on how others do? For example, the OL gets credit for how well the QB and RBs do and for what they limit the DL line to (in terms of sacks/TFLs).
4. Why would I care about a sport where I can only watch half the games, if that (church)
3. If I can't have Colt Brennan as my fantasy QB, where's the fun? (I know CBS-Sportsline has Fantasy College Football, but I couldn't get it to work)
2. College Football > NFL; if you don't know why or don't agree, go away!
1. Real men know what ATS and O/U stand for. Most fantasy fans play for free, while real men gamble with real money. And no, I don't advocate betting with your local bookies, unless your local bookie is named Caesar's Palace or the like.
|
| | Posted 9/6/2007 10:58 PM - 31 views - 0 comments
- recommend
  - recs0
- give stars
- votes0
- share
- email
 - sent0
|
